As everyone knows Six Apart has released the 3.0 version of their Movable Type publishing software. With this release comes a new licensing model that has stirred up a lot of contempt amongst the community. Timothy Appnel offers a little more level-headed critique in his article Movable Type 3.0 and Eating.

Timothy voices his concern about the reaction that the new licensing model has garnered. However, he seems to miss the point of why many people are upset. In this case, the user community got dismissed while the developer community got what they wanted.

Movable Type was created by Ben and Mena Trott for their own personal reasons. They shared it to the world with two different licenses, Personal and Commerical. If you wished to use MT for commercial reasons you were to pay $150 for the licensing fee. Good deal. However, MT did not grow to prominence because of this business license, but because the user community so vehemently advertised the greatness of MT. Developers produced wonderful plugins that continued to extend the featureset of MT. Basically MT’s growth is a direct result of its community.

Along the way the idea of the mythical MT Pro started to spread and people got excited about it and rightly so because it was to offer many of the features that seemed to be lacking. When the beta for MT 3.0 started to rollout, Mena discussed how it was going to be a maintenance release instead of a feature release and that the mythical MT Pro was not to be. I figured maintenance release meant that they would just be doing updates like Microsoft does with its Service Packs. Some people in the community were disheartened by this news, but hey, we still got a great product for free that we could continue to contribute towards.

And now we have MT 3.0 and the new licensing scheme. There is one free version with one author and a cap of three weblogs. There are still two license models: Personal and Commercial. However, now even the Personal license users have to cough up some change. And what do the users who helped make MT popular get out of this? A maintenance release. Sure the developer community may have gotten some cool new features along with a contest, but what about the user community? What do they get?

This made me think what would happen if MySQL decided to charge for personal use of their database. Would some developers say that we have no reason to complain then? Probably, but we would have every right to. However, MySQL seems to be doing pretty well with a dual-licensing model, wonder why SixApart feels they couldn’t?

If it was still just Ben and Mena changing everything then maybe there wouldn’t be such a backlash. However, this is now SixApart The Company that has decided to change the licensing scheme. Another company after another dollar it seems.

The community has an attachment to MT. They are proud that it has opened up the doors to the independent publishing world for them. It has allowed them to connect to friends worldwide and to share a single site with a group of friends. There was no warning of this change. There was no real explanation. Should the community feel a little upset? Yeah, I think so.

  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Facebook

Related posts:

Movable Type 3.1 Launched
Movable Power Strips
New Linux Users Changing the Face of the Community
Upgraded Motherboard = New Windows Licence
A Splintering Linux Community

Hope you like that post!

Forever Geek is a resource for all things geek. You can stay tuned by having the latest FG news delivered to you for free via RSS.