<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New New Nintendo DS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/07/the_new_new_nintendo_ds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/07/the_new_new_nintendo_ds/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: basit</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/07/the_new_new_nintendo_ds/comment-page-1/#comment-40719</link>
		<dc:creator>basit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=596#comment-40719</guid>
		<description>is this the new DS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this the new DS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arielle</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/07/the_new_new_nintendo_ds/comment-page-1/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Arielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=596#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>I think the DS&#039; new look is great! I never thought the DS looked bad in the first place, but this is still exciting for me because everywhere I go, those biased Sony fans rave about how &quot;sexy&quot; the PSP is, and then they comment on the DS being &quot;bulky&quot;. Do you know how disgusting it is to say an inanimate object is sexually appealing? Sleek, maybe. But SEXY?! That&#039;s a disturbing way of thinking of it. The DS always looked better than the PSP in my eyes, even with its older design. You have to look beneath the hardware. And no, I don&#039;t mean specs. I mean INNOVATIVENSS. The PSP may have &quot;the specs&quot; but the DS has THE INNOVATIVENSS. Sure, the &quot;touch screen&quot; has been used before, but on a gaming system? No. Off-topic, I know. Either way, the new DS looks great, and I already reserved mine, so I&#039;ll be awaiting its arrival in November.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the DS&#8217; new look is great! I never thought the DS looked bad in the first place, but this is still exciting for me because everywhere I go, those biased Sony fans rave about how &#8220;sexy&#8221; the PSP is, and then they comment on the DS being &#8220;bulky&#8221;. Do you know how disgusting it is to say an inanimate object is sexually appealing? Sleek, maybe. But SEXY?! That&#8217;s a disturbing way of thinking of it. The DS always looked better than the PSP in my eyes, even with its older design. You have to look beneath the hardware. And no, I don&#8217;t mean specs. I mean INNOVATIVENSS. The PSP may have &#8220;the specs&#8221; but the DS has THE INNOVATIVENSS. Sure, the &#8220;touch screen&#8221; has been used before, but on a gaming system? No. Off-topic, I know. Either way, the new DS looks great, and I already reserved mine, so I&#8217;ll be awaiting its arrival in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
