<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP 5: A Sign That PHP Could Soon Be Owned By Sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/08/php_5_a_sign_that_php_could_soon_be_owned_by_sun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/08/php_5_a_sign_that_php_could_soon_be_owned_by_sun/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/08/php_5_a_sign_that_php_could_soon_be_owned_by_sun/#comment-19541</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=616#comment-19541</guid>
		<description>Man, this guy is doomsday-ist.  Sheesh.  I was lost on the extrapolation from making PHP integrate with Java to PHP being too expensive to develop in in five years.  WTF is right.

&lt;blockquote&gt;While this version of PHP does provide a much better object model and added features, is this the beginning of the end of PHP as the choice of web scripting language for the open-source community and developers not under the employ of corporations? Will the average developer still be using PHP five years from now, or will the usefulness of PHP be limited to companies who can afford to shell out thousands of dollars for all of the necessary software that may be required to make PHP a viable option for development (along with the purchase of products from Sun, Macromedia, Oracle, Borland and others)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The author switches between completely non-connected ideas faster than I can snap my fingers.  I would think if he&#039;s going to make such a strong statement, his arguments should at least be coherent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this guy is doomsday-ist.  Sheesh.  I was lost on the extrapolation from making PHP integrate with Java to PHP being too expensive to develop in in five years.  WTF is right.</p>
<blockquote><p>While this version of PHP does provide a much better object model and added features, is this the beginning of the end of PHP as the choice of web scripting language for the open-source community and developers not under the employ of corporations? Will the average developer still be using PHP five years from now, or will the usefulness of PHP be limited to companies who can afford to shell out thousands of dollars for all of the necessary software that may be required to make PHP a viable option for development (along with the purchase of products from Sun, Macromedia, Oracle, Borland and others)?</p></blockquote>
<p>The author switches between completely non-connected ideas faster than I can snap my fingers.  I would think if he&#8217;s going to make such a strong statement, his arguments should at least be coherent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

