<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bare Feats: Intel vs. AMD vs. Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:15:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/comment-page-1/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=812#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>Go ahead and spend your hard earned money on intel and mac. you&#039;ll spend more money and get less for the bang. AMD is the way to go all others are losers in the fight. Real sad to see intel pairing up with mac because they can&#039;t compete with AMD!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead and spend your hard earned money on intel and mac. you&#8217;ll spend more money and get less for the bang. AMD is the way to go all others are losers in the fight. Real sad to see intel pairing up with mac because they can&#8217;t compete with AMD!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/comment-page-1/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 10:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=812#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>dunno about u boys but no matter what tests come out i think its still personal choice hehehe, resuslts dont seem to change ppls mind, ive spent big $$ proving ot my friend and there still jubious so no matter the top[ic u can only host ur oppinion  its a waste of time arguing it in my eyes.
i built a amd x2 3000 on vapochill cooling overclocked to 3gighz ( dual core so 6gighz procession power)
2 gig xms paired 522mhz ram on a asus a8n with a 6800gt ( agp board) 2 raptor 74 gig drives and 160 gig hitachi for logical storage  hence on a outdated vid card clocking over 200 fps in doom 3 video stress test, and rendering video much faster than mates p4 running at 4000 mhz with as much bling bling as mine.  in the end its all shits n giggles and dollars ehhehe  just enjoy what u got as next week its outdated hahhaah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno about u boys but no matter what tests come out i think its still personal choice hehehe, resuslts dont seem to change ppls mind, ive spent big $$ proving ot my friend and there still jubious so no matter the top[ic u can only host ur oppinion  its a waste of time arguing it in my eyes.<br />
i built a amd x2 3000 on vapochill cooling overclocked to 3gighz ( dual core so 6gighz procession power)<br />
2 gig xms paired 522mhz ram on a asus a8n with a 6800gt ( agp board) 2 raptor 74 gig drives and 160 gig hitachi for logical storage  hence on a outdated vid card clocking over 200 fps in doom 3 video stress test, and rendering video much faster than mates p4 running at 4000 mhz with as much bling bling as mine.  in the end its all shits n giggles and dollars ehhehe  just enjoy what u got as next week its outdated hahhaah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/comment-page-1/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=812#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>LOL Joesph is right THO!!!...AMD EATS MACS FOR BREAKFAST...SOCKET AM2 IS COMING FOR YOU QUAD CORE IN YOUR FACE&gt;&gt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Joesph is right THO!!!&#8230;AMD EATS MACS FOR BREAKFAST&#8230;SOCKET AM2 IS COMING FOR YOU QUAD CORE IN YOUR FACE>>></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/comment-page-1/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=812#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>so far an article posted in october, you&#039;re taking issue with it not using processors that probably weren&#039;t out yet at the time? And even better, getting pissy with us as if we wrote the article you don&#039;t like? Get a little perspective, bucko.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so far an article posted in october, you&#8217;re taking issue with it not using processors that probably weren&#8217;t out yet at the time? And even better, getting pissy with us as if we wrote the article you don&#8217;t like? Get a little perspective, bucko.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph  f  c</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/bare_feats_intel_vs_amd_vs_apple/comment-page-1/#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph  f  c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=812#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>I would like to see you put the FX- processor from AMD that goes 2.6ghz against it.  Or even the fx that goes 2.4ghz.  You used a processor that is on top but yet not the top of it, and you used the highest G5 against it, isnt thta skewed?  I believe so, you skewed the results.  Not only that, the archectectures are differnet and on different hardware.  And IBM makes the processor in G5.  And guess what?  the SOI technology?  partnered by IBM and AMD.  Oh forgot, hypertransport, developed at AMD.  Apple needed help, so they asked their competition for help, ie. IBM indirectly AMD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see you put the FX- processor from AMD that goes 2.6ghz against it.  Or even the fx that goes 2.4ghz.  You used a processor that is on top but yet not the top of it, and you used the highest G5 against it, isnt thta skewed?  I believe so, you skewed the results.  Not only that, the archectectures are differnet and on different hardware.  And IBM makes the processor in G5.  And guess what?  the SOI technology?  partnered by IBM and AMD.  Oh forgot, hypertransport, developed at AMD.  Apple needed help, so they asked their competition for help, ie. IBM indirectly AMD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
