<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slow Ass Slashdot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/slow_ass_slashdot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/slow_ass_slashdot/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Minard</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/slow_ass_slashdot/#comment-19976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Minard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=881#comment-19976</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Slashdot has been slow for quite some time now. Thing reported here even, are showing up on /. 3, 4, even 5 days later. It&#039;s kinda...ho hum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Slashdot has been slow for quite some time now. Thing reported here even, are showing up on /. 3, 4, even 5 days later. It&#8217;s kinda&#8230;ho hum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/slow_ass_slashdot/#comment-19975</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=881#comment-19975</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you.  It&#039;s ironic because I had just made the same comment today to a colleague about the post &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/articles/04/10/25/2120222.shtml?tid=217&amp;tid=154&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google-branded Firefox&lt;/a&gt;&quot; (&lt;em&gt;news that&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kottke.org/04/09/more-google-browser&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;decomposingly  old&lt;/a&gt; by now&lt;/em&gt;).   I think the Slashdot Era is &lt;a href=&quot;http://compooter.org/article/70/slashdot-rss/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;coming to an end&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  It&#8217;s ironic because I had just made the same comment today to a colleague about the post &#8220;<a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/04/10/25/2120222.shtml?tid=217&#038;tid=154" rel="nofollow">Google-branded Firefox</a>&#8221; (<em>news that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.kottke.org/04/09/more-google-browser" rel="nofollow">decomposingly  old</a> by now</em>).   I think the Slashdot Era is <a href="http://compooter.org/article/70/slashdot-rss/" rel="nofollow">coming to an end</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/slow_ass_slashdot/#comment-19974</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=881#comment-19974</guid>
		<description>I submitted th story about the Google Desktop Proxy to Slashdot, and it took them three days to reject it. The worry is not the rejection but simply how long it took from submition to processed item. I&#039;ve seen it on a number of occasions lately, and it especially happens to sensitive items. I&#039;m tempted to think Slashdot is becoming somewhat more filtered and probed. Good thing Forever Geek is around, then, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I submitted th story about the Google Desktop Proxy to Slashdot, and it took them three days to reject it. The worry is not the rejection but simply how long it took from submition to processed item. I&#8217;ve seen it on a number of occasions lately, and it especially happens to sensitive items. I&#8217;m tempted to think Slashdot is becoming somewhat more filtered and probed. Good thing Forever Geek is around, then, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

