<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP SP2 vs. SP1 performance comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-46360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 09:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-46360</guid>
		<description>There are lots of differences. Firstly, when installing SP2 microsoft&#039;s own java virtual machine gets uninstalled. This is a fisadvantage of upgrading. However, when you upgrade, you get LOTS of benefits, such as a *very* improved security, a better firewall, the microsoft security center, the access to latest updates, IE8, WMP11 (I prefer 10), improved WiFi management, etc. Almost everything relates to security improvements. On the other hand, if your computer is running slow or it isn&#039;t fast, I&#039;d recommend you to stick with SP1 (as I have seen computers with 128 mb RAM running ok with SP1 and 512mb RAM running slow with SP2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of differences. Firstly, when installing SP2 microsoft&#8217;s own java virtual machine gets uninstalled. This is a fisadvantage of upgrading. However, when you upgrade, you get LOTS of benefits, such as a *very* improved security, a better firewall, the microsoft security center, the access to latest updates, IE8, WMP11 (I prefer 10), improved WiFi management, etc. Almost everything relates to security improvements. On the other hand, if your computer is running slow or it isn&#8217;t fast, I&#8217;d recommend you to stick with SP1 (as I have seen computers with 128 mb RAM running ok with SP1 and 512mb RAM running slow with SP2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMR-PWND-U</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-41960</link>
		<dc:creator>PMR-PWND-U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-41960</guid>
		<description>FF does NOT use more memory than IE. Where have you been, dude? FF is the second fastest, second least bloatware browser there is! IE TOPS the list for Bloatware! Anything made by MicroSoft is going to be BLOATWARE! 

I would advise you people to do some research, and be involved in the field you are posting about (unless asking questions) before you post. It does NOT make you look good, it only makes you look like a bunch of..... Mis Informed SHEEPLE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FF does NOT use more memory than IE. Where have you been, dude? FF is the second fastest, second least bloatware browser there is! IE TOPS the list for Bloatware! Anything made by MicroSoft is going to be BLOATWARE! </p>
<p>I would advise you people to do some research, and be involved in the field you are posting about (unless asking questions) before you post. It does NOT make you look good, it only makes you look like a bunch of&#8230;.. Mis Informed SHEEPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMR-PWND-U</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-41959</link>
		<dc:creator>PMR-PWND-U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-41959</guid>
		<description>It is obvious that you &quot;Average&quot; and &quot;Non-Average :-)&quot; users have not discovered the 3 tools you really NEED to keep your PC not only Virus and Malware free, but also port blocked!
#1.) Get the newest Norton Internet Security Suite or 360. It provides you with the most protection you will get out of any software. Microsoft is NOT concerned with your personal information safety, rather only what it HAS to do to keep &quot;Uncle Sam&quot; happy.
 
#2.) Spybot Search &amp; Destroy. This tool will find and clean anything the prior and latter do not, plus has a registry protection program you can opt to use (I use, and it is wonderful) called TeaTimer. Don&#039;t worry, you can still add/delete registry key&#039;s manually with no issue, just click the accept button when TeaTimer prompts you.

#3.) Malwarebytes. This will find and remove most internet threats out there today. They are constantly updating (I had 3 different, separate updates on 1/23/2011 alone and still counting) and ARE committed to yours and my internet safety. 
All of the software options I provided to you are the BEST OF THE BEST. 
Spybot Search and Destroy is FREE. MalwareBytes is FREE. Neither one are harmful. Norton Internet Security 2010 you can find 30/60/90 day free trials all day long, but I do prefer to pay for mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious that you &#8220;Average&#8221; and &#8220;Non-Average :-)&#8221; users have not discovered the 3 tools you really NEED to keep your PC not only Virus and Malware free, but also port blocked!<br />
#1.) Get the newest Norton Internet Security Suite or 360. It provides you with the most protection you will get out of any software. Microsoft is NOT concerned with your personal information safety, rather only what it HAS to do to keep &#8220;Uncle Sam&#8221; happy.</p>
<p>#2.) Spybot Search &amp; Destroy. This tool will find and clean anything the prior and latter do not, plus has a registry protection program you can opt to use (I use, and it is wonderful) called TeaTimer. Don&#8217;t worry, you can still add/delete registry key&#8217;s manually with no issue, just click the accept button when TeaTimer prompts you.</p>
<p>#3.) Malwarebytes. This will find and remove most internet threats out there today. They are constantly updating (I had 3 different, separate updates on 1/23/2011 alone and still counting) and ARE committed to yours and my internet safety.<br />
All of the software options I provided to you are the BEST OF THE BEST.<br />
Spybot Search and Destroy is FREE. MalwareBytes is FREE. Neither one are harmful. Norton Internet Security 2010 you can find 30/60/90 day free trials all day long, but I do prefer to pay for mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subi</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>subi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>hurry up!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hurry up!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subi</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>subi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve asked to many persons but nobody give correct answer for my question is that &#039;difference between windows xp sp1 and sp2. if anybody know exact answer for this question kindly send me following mail id.  supi7821@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked to many persons but nobody give correct answer for my question is that &#8216;difference between windows xp sp1 and sp2. if anybody know exact answer for this question kindly send me following mail id.  <a href="mailto:supi7821@gmail.com">supi7821@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>what is the difference bewteen windos xp sp1 and windows xp sp2 in terms of its installation in mac computer using boot camp because boot camp recommonds  sp2 version of windows only.
I have windows xp sp1 cd how to convert it into sp2
 regards
kamal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the difference bewteen windos xp sp1 and windows xp sp2 in terms of its installation in mac computer using boot camp because boot camp recommonds  sp2 version of windows only.<br />
I have windows xp sp1 cd how to convert it into sp2<br />
 regards<br />
kamal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>athan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>sp1 sucks.... its prone to all the BUGS we all hate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sp1 sucks&#8230;. its prone to all the BUGS we all hate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft.Sucks unrelated</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft.Sucks unrelated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>I just ordered the sp2 cd and am going to install it because all I want is to upgrade from IE6 sp1 to IE7 or at least ADD IE7, by the way cody an operating system will never die before the people do... :) it just gets ignored and thrown into the closed and locked away for years, and years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered the sp2 cd and am going to install it because all I want is to upgrade from IE6 sp1 to IE7 or at least ADD IE7, by the way cody an operating system will never die before the people do&#8230; :) it just gets ignored and thrown into the closed and locked away for years, and years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>Iv been running windowss xp without service packs and found the performance high and for an AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ @1.6GHz that is good but starting to admit it that if i want my computers opperating system to last i need to install xp sp2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iv been running windowss xp without service packs and found the performance high and for an AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ @1.6GHz that is good but starting to admit it that if i want my computers opperating system to last i need to install xp sp2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft.Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft.Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>I hate to admit it but I installed Windows XP SP2 instead of SP1. I never had any problems with viruses, spyware, or any other privacy/security threat on SP1. But, with Microsoft discontinuing support for SP1 I was, kind of, forced into it. I don&#039;t care about security updates I manage and keep my system secure myself. The support for IE7 and WMP11 is what got me to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to admit it but I installed Windows XP SP2 instead of SP1. I never had any problems with viruses, spyware, or any other privacy/security threat on SP1. But, with Microsoft discontinuing support for SP1 I was, kind of, forced into it. I don&#8217;t care about security updates I manage and keep my system secure myself. The support for IE7 and WMP11 is what got me to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dankman</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>dankman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>high speed usb???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high speed usb???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muthu</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>muthu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>this is very useful site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is very useful site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 05:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>I upgraded Windows XP sp1 to sp2 and now my audio doesn&#039;t work!  Any suggestions on how to fix this problem?  Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded Windows XP sp1 to sp2 and now my audio doesn&#8217;t work!  Any suggestions on how to fix this problem?  Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolly</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>jolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>Ya, I kinda agree with the point of installing premiere 2 with presence of sp2, it&#039;s rediculous... any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, I kinda agree with the point of installing premiere 2 with presence of sp2, it&#8217;s rediculous&#8230; any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>is there a way to install premiere 2 without installing sp2?...I&#039;m working with audio software which has NUMEROUS issues with sp2 and i want to avoid installing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a way to install premiere 2 without installing sp2?&#8230;I&#8217;m working with audio software which has NUMEROUS issues with sp2 and i want to avoid installing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>The only reason I upgraded to SP2 is because you cannot install Adobe Premiere 2.0 unless you have been upgraded to SP2.  I don&#039;t like SP2 but I had no choice in the matter and I think it&#039;s rediculous you need it for that program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I upgraded to SP2 is because you cannot install Adobe Premiere 2.0 unless you have been upgraded to SP2.  I don&#8217;t like SP2 but I had no choice in the matter and I think it&#8217;s rediculous you need it for that program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HELP</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>HELP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,
I installed windows xp sp2 few dAYS ago, but now my play speed music is high for all software (win. media player, real playerâŠ). HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,<br />
I installed windows xp sp2 few dAYS ago, but now my play speed music is high for all software (win. media player, real playerâŠ). HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: help</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator>help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2284</guid>
		<description>HI guys,
I installed windows xp sp2 few dyas ago, but now my play speed music is high for all softwares. HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI guys,<br />
I installed windows xp sp2 few dyas ago, but now my play speed music is high for all softwares. HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>30Dec2005
The original test has vanished from the ether. (ie the link doesn&#039;t work:P).

Would be interesting to know if the situation has changed over the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30Dec2005<br />
The original test has vanished from the ether. (ie the link doesn&#8217;t work:P).</p>
<p>Would be interesting to know if the situation has changed over the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpyderCanopus</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>SpyderCanopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>I sure as heck notice a huge difference in SP1 &amp; SP2 when starting up Windows.  You know you can still get security updates without SP2 so whats the point except to let it hold your hand while your on the PC.  If you&#039;re a IT whiz in your family, you can do without it.  I haven&#039;t done any comparison directly with SP1 vs SP2, but everyone knows SP2 WAY more than 0.5% slower than SP2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure as heck notice a huge difference in SP1 &#038; SP2 when starting up Windows.  You know you can still get security updates without SP2 so whats the point except to let it hold your hand while your on the PC.  If you&#8217;re a IT whiz in your family, you can do without it.  I haven&#8217;t done any comparison directly with SP1 vs SP2, but everyone knows SP2 WAY more than 0.5% slower than SP2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>you guys suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kshitij Prasai</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Kshitij Prasai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>Does SP2 support USB 2.0 like SP1 does?? I have a hight speed USB 2.0 PCMCI card hooked up to my pentium III 700Mhz laptop, and when I plugin a USB 2.0 Drive in the Card it still gives me the &quot;HI-SPEED USB device and will function at reduced speed when plugged into a non-HI-SPEED port&quot; error message</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does SP2 support USB 2.0 like SP1 does?? I have a hight speed USB 2.0 PCMCI card hooked up to my pentium III 700Mhz laptop, and when I plugin a USB 2.0 Drive in the Card it still gives me the &#8220;HI-SPEED USB device and will function at reduced speed when plugged into a non-HI-SPEED port&#8221; error message</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>in sisoft sandra I got a slight decrease in performance with sp2 installed over sp1.

I formatted, installed SP1, formatted and installed SP2. That was my method for testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in sisoft sandra I got a slight decrease in performance with sp2 installed over sp1.</p>
<p>I formatted, installed SP1, formatted and installed SP2. That was my method for testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>I have a P4 3.06Ghz on a P4PE ASUS with 1Gb RAM. I installed a new version WXP SP1. I tested it with a banchmarking program (Sandra Lite 2005 and PCBench) and it&#039;s ranked correclty. I intalled SP2 (no others pgm) and the PC has been downgraded as a PIII 700Hz in term of MIPS and FLOAT.  I thing that with SP2 some pgm have prolblem in using the virtual CPU.  Any help ? by</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a P4 3.06Ghz on a P4PE ASUS with 1Gb RAM. I installed a new version WXP SP1. I tested it with a banchmarking program (Sandra Lite 2005 and PCBench) and it&#8217;s ranked correclty. I intalled SP2 (no others pgm) and the PC has been downgraded as a PIII 700Hz in term of MIPS and FLOAT.  I thing that with SP2 some pgm have prolblem in using the virtual CPU.  Any help ? by</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbutti</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;lol&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If only I didn&#039;t love her... =) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
<p>If only I didn&#8217;t love her&#8230; =) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

