<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP SP2 vs. SP1 performance comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: subi</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-50440</link>
		<dc:creator>subi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-50440</guid>
		<description>hurry up!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hurry up!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subi</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-50439</link>
		<dc:creator>subi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-50439</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve asked to many persons but nobody give correct answer for my question is that &#039;difference between windows xp sp1 and sp2. if anybody know exact answer for this question kindly send me following mail id.  supi7821@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked to many persons but nobody give correct answer for my question is that &#8216;difference between windows xp sp1 and sp2. if anybody know exact answer for this question kindly send me following mail id.  <a href="mailto:supi7821@gmail.com">supi7821@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4809</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4809</guid>
		<description>what is the difference bewteen windos xp sp1 and windows xp sp2 in terms of its installation in mac computer using boot camp because boot camp recommonds  sp2 version of windows only.
I have windows xp sp1 cd how to convert it into sp2
 regards
kamal
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the difference bewteen windos xp sp1 and windows xp sp2 in terms of its installation in mac computer using boot camp because boot camp recommonds  sp2 version of windows only.<br />
I have windows xp sp1 cd how to convert it into sp2<br />
 regards<br />
kamal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4807</link>
		<dc:creator>athan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4807</guid>
		<description>sp1 sucks.... its prone to all the BUGS we all hate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sp1 sucks&#8230;. its prone to all the BUGS we all hate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft.Sucks unrelated</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft.Sucks unrelated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>I just ordered the sp2 cd and am going to install it because all I want is to upgrade from IE6 sp1 to IE7 or at least ADD IE7, by the way cody an operating system will never die before the people do... :) it just gets ignored and thrown into the closed and locked away for years, and years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered the sp2 cd and am going to install it because all I want is to upgrade from IE6 sp1 to IE7 or at least ADD IE7, by the way cody an operating system will never die before the people do&#8230; :) it just gets ignored and thrown into the closed and locked away for years, and years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>Iv been running windowss xp without service packs and found the performance high and for an AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ @1.6GHz that is good but starting to admit it that if i want my computers opperating system to last i need to install xp sp2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iv been running windowss xp without service packs and found the performance high and for an AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ @1.6GHz that is good but starting to admit it that if i want my computers opperating system to last i need to install xp sp2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft.Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4804</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft.Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4804</guid>
		<description>I hate to admit it but I installed Windows XP SP2 instead of SP1. I never had any problems with viruses, spyware, or any other privacy/security threat on SP1. But, with Microsoft discontinuing support for SP1 I was, kind of, forced into it. I don&#039;t care about security updates I manage and keep my system secure myself. The support for IE7 and WMP11 is what got me to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to admit it but I installed Windows XP SP2 instead of SP1. I never had any problems with viruses, spyware, or any other privacy/security threat on SP1. But, with Microsoft discontinuing support for SP1 I was, kind of, forced into it. I don&#8217;t care about security updates I manage and keep my system secure myself. The support for IE7 and WMP11 is what got me to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dankman</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>dankman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>high speed usb???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high speed usb???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muthu</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4802</link>
		<dc:creator>muthu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4802</guid>
		<description>this is very useful site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is very useful site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4801</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 05:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4801</guid>
		<description>I upgraded Windows XP sp1 to sp2 and now my audio doesn&#039;t work!  Any suggestions on how to fix this problem?  Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded Windows XP sp1 to sp2 and now my audio doesn&#8217;t work!  Any suggestions on how to fix this problem?  Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolly</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4800</link>
		<dc:creator>jolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4800</guid>
		<description>Ya, I kinda agree with the point of installing premiere 2 with presence of sp2, it&#039;s rediculous... any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, I kinda agree with the point of installing premiere 2 with presence of sp2, it&#8217;s rediculous&#8230; any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>is there a way to install premiere 2 without installing sp2?...I&#039;m working with audio software which has NUMEROUS issues with sp2 and i want to avoid installing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a way to install premiere 2 without installing sp2?&#8230;I&#8217;m working with audio software which has NUMEROUS issues with sp2 and i want to avoid installing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>The only reason I upgraded to SP2 is because you cannot install Adobe Premiere 2.0 unless you have been upgraded to SP2.  I don&#039;t like SP2 but I had no choice in the matter and I think it&#039;s rediculous you need it for that program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I upgraded to SP2 is because you cannot install Adobe Premiere 2.0 unless you have been upgraded to SP2.  I don&#8217;t like SP2 but I had no choice in the matter and I think it&#8217;s rediculous you need it for that program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HELP</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>HELP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,
I installed windows xp sp2 few dAYS ago, but now my play speed music is high for all software (win. media player, real playerâŠ). HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,<br />
I installed windows xp sp2 few dAYS ago, but now my play speed music is high for all software (win. media player, real playerâŠ). HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: help</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>HI guys,
I installed windows xp sp2 few dyas ago, but now my play speed music is high for all softwares. HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI guys,<br />
I installed windows xp sp2 few dyas ago, but now my play speed music is high for all softwares. HELP, if someone can tell me how to solve the pbm or decrease the play speed.</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4795</guid>
		<description>30Dec2005
The original test has vanished from the ether. (ie the link doesn&#039;t work:P).

Would be interesting to know if the situation has changed over the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30Dec2005<br />
The original test has vanished from the ether. (ie the link doesn&#8217;t work:P).</p>
<p>Would be interesting to know if the situation has changed over the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpyderCanopus</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>SpyderCanopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>I sure as heck notice a huge difference in SP1 &amp; SP2 when starting up Windows.  You know you can still get security updates without SP2 so whats the point except to let it hold your hand while your on the PC.  If you&#039;re a IT whiz in your family, you can do without it.  I haven&#039;t done any comparison directly with SP1 vs SP2, but everyone knows SP2 WAY more than 0.5% slower than SP2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure as heck notice a huge difference in SP1 &#038; SP2 when starting up Windows.  You know you can still get security updates without SP2 so whats the point except to let it hold your hand while your on the PC.  If you&#8217;re a IT whiz in your family, you can do without it.  I haven&#8217;t done any comparison directly with SP1 vs SP2, but everyone knows SP2 WAY more than 0.5% slower than SP2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>you guys suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kshitij Prasai</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Kshitij Prasai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>Does SP2 support USB 2.0 like SP1 does?? I have a hight speed USB 2.0 PCMCI card hooked up to my pentium III 700Mhz laptop, and when I plugin a USB 2.0 Drive in the Card it still gives me the &quot;HI-SPEED USB device and will function at reduced speed when plugged into a non-HI-SPEED port&quot; error message</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does SP2 support USB 2.0 like SP1 does?? I have a hight speed USB 2.0 PCMCI card hooked up to my pentium III 700Mhz laptop, and when I plugin a USB 2.0 Drive in the Card it still gives me the &#8220;HI-SPEED USB device and will function at reduced speed when plugged into a non-HI-SPEED port&#8221; error message</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>in sisoft sandra I got a slight decrease in performance with sp2 installed over sp1.

I formatted, installed SP1, formatted and installed SP2. That was my method for testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in sisoft sandra I got a slight decrease in performance with sp2 installed over sp1.</p>
<p>I formatted, installed SP1, formatted and installed SP2. That was my method for testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4790</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4790</guid>
		<description>I have a P4 3.06Ghz on a P4PE ASUS with 1Gb RAM. I installed a new version WXP SP1. I tested it with a banchmarking program (Sandra Lite 2005 and PCBench) and it&#039;s ranked correclty. I intalled SP2 (no others pgm) and the PC has been downgraded as a PIII 700Hz in term of MIPS and FLOAT.  I thing that with SP2 some pgm have prolblem in using the virtual CPU.  Any help ? by</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a P4 3.06Ghz on a P4PE ASUS with 1Gb RAM. I installed a new version WXP SP1. I tested it with a banchmarking program (Sandra Lite 2005 and PCBench) and it&#8217;s ranked correclty. I intalled SP2 (no others pgm) and the PC has been downgraded as a PIII 700Hz in term of MIPS and FLOAT.  I thing that with SP2 some pgm have prolblem in using the virtual CPU.  Any help ? by</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbutti</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;lol&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If only I didn&#039;t love her... =) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
<p>If only I didn&#8217;t love her&#8230; =) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>How about upgrading the girlfriend instead?!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about upgrading the girlfriend instead?!  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbutti</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>She started using Firefox a little while ago. The problem is that her PC is kinda old and FF requires more memory than IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She started using Firefox a little while ago. The problem is that her PC is kinda old and FF requires more memory than IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netaku</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4786</link>
		<dc:creator>Netaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4786</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not bothereing with SP2 for a while. Never really had problems with SP1, and I&#039;m not really in an adventurous mood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not bothereing with SP2 for a while. Never really had problems with SP1, and I&#8217;m not really in an adventurous mood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minghong</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>minghong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>Do your girl friend a flavour and install Firefox. It is not a geek browser. 1.0 final will be out soon so you may like to keep attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do your girl friend a flavour and install Firefox. It is not a geek browser. 1.0 final will be out soon so you may like to keep attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbutti</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4784</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been using Windows XP with no service pack for 3 years and never had a problem with spyware or anything else, but that&#039;s just because I&#039;m not an average user.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I encourage average users that I know on upgrading to Service Pack 2, although that might not save them from all the harmful things that internet offer. My girlfriend is a completely average user and I have to reformat her PC and reinstall Windows every 2 months because of all the spyware, virus and slowness. I always install the newsest service pack and security updates but somehow that just doesn&#039;t seem to work for her. Maybe it is impossible for Windows to be a completely safe operating system for the average user... ( or maybe my girlfriend is the problem :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Windows XP with no service pack for 3 years and never had a problem with spyware or anything else, but that&#8217;s just because I&#8217;m not an average user.</p>
<p>I encourage average users that I know on upgrading to Service Pack 2, although that might not save them from all the harmful things that internet offer. My girlfriend is a completely average user and I have to reformat her PC and reinstall Windows every 2 months because of all the spyware, virus and slowness. I always install the newsest service pack and security updates but somehow that just doesn&#8217;t seem to work for her. Maybe it is impossible for Windows to be a completely safe operating system for the average user&#8230; ( or maybe my girlfriend is the problem :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2004/10/windows_xp_sp2_vs_sp1_performance_comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4783</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=864#comment-4783</guid>
		<description>Hmm... how about they do it again, after an average user has used each PC for 3 months... see what the difference is once 3 months worth of spyware has accumulated on the SP1 box, that the SP2 box blocked... I have a suspicion the performance numbers might just tilt in the opposite direction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; how about they do it again, after an average user has used each PC for 3 months&#8230; see what the difference is once 3 months worth of spyware has accumulated on the SP1 box, that the SP2 box blocked&#8230; I have a suspicion the performance numbers might just tilt in the opposite direction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
