<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Shuffle Comparison Pics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1071#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>ipods rock any kind but the video ones ROCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ipods rock any kind but the video ones ROCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anik</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/#comment-7155</link>
		<dc:creator>anik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1071#comment-7155</guid>
		<description>it looks sooo cute...if i get an offer for less than $100 i will definatly get it...
pity it has no screen....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks sooo cute&#8230;if i get an offer for less than $100 i will definatly get it&#8230;<br />
pity it has no screen&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/#comment-7154</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1071#comment-7154</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m much more likely to break one of the larger iPods than this little thing. At less than an ounce, you could easily drop it and have no ill effects, especially with no moving parts. The big iPods on the other hand, would never survive a drop, or even scratches for that matter. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m much more likely to break one of the larger iPods than this little thing. At less than an ounce, you could easily drop it and have no ill effects, especially with no moving parts. The big iPods on the other hand, would never survive a drop, or even scratches for that matter. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Dunn II</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/ipod_shuffle_comparison_pics/#comment-7153</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Dunn II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1071#comment-7153</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d break it, and I&#039;m too poor to gamble with such a small device. That&#039;s why I don&#039;t do jewelry.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d break it, and I&#8217;m too poor to gamble with such a small device. That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t do jewelry.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

