<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text editors for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jackblack</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8890</link>
		<dc:creator>jackblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8890</guid>
		<description>notepad #2 is the best.
no registry modification necessary.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notepad #2 is the best.<br />
no registry modification necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8889</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8889</guid>
		<description>Dear Friend here is the answer to your fustrations. &quot;e&quot; is a new recently released text editor, which gives you all the things, which you need. The editor are similar to TexMate but runs on Window, has the BUNDLE features and an unique undo facility as well. It has been reviewed by &quot;X-Factor and &quot;DIGG&quot; with a promissing future. I can only recommend you to TRY it !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Friend here is the answer to your fustrations. &#8220;e&#8221; is a new recently released text editor, which gives you all the things, which you need. The editor are similar to TexMate but runs on Window, has the BUNDLE features and an unique undo facility as well. It has been reviewed by &#8220;X-Factor and &#8220;DIGG&#8221; with a promissing future. I can only recommend you to TRY it !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich F.</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8888</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8888</guid>
		<description>I use SciTE and love it, does everything I need it to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use SciTE and love it, does everything I need it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard S.</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8887</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8887</guid>
		<description>I like Homesite myself, I&#039;ve used it for years even before I got involved with CF. But unfortunately, we&#039;re having to give it up in favor of Dreamweaver or Eclipse because of it&#039;s lack of UTF-8 Encoding support. I wish Adobe would have the foresight to, at the very least, create a Homesite patch that would fix this issue. From what I see, there are a lot of developers out there that still like and use Homesite. I hope Adobe is listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Homesite myself, I&#8217;ve used it for years even before I got involved with CF. But unfortunately, we&#8217;re having to give it up in favor of Dreamweaver or Eclipse because of it&#8217;s lack of UTF-8 Encoding support. I wish Adobe would have the foresight to, at the very least, create a Homesite patch that would fix this issue. From what I see, there are a lot of developers out there that still like and use Homesite. I hope Adobe is listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hakan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8886</link>
		<dc:creator>Hakan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8886</guid>
		<description>I think NotePad2 is wonderful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think NotePad2 is wonderful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8885</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8885</guid>
		<description>I used to be a religious EditPlus 2 user until I wanted to edit Unicode files -- it doesn&#039;t support Unicode or UTF8 (little surprised that Ian didn&#039;t mention that in his otherwise comprehensive comparison). I now use Ultra Edit, which is not bad, but not the nicest UI. Can&#039;t understand why anyone would want to use TextPad -- I am forced to use it at work, and it is unfeasibly slow to load and as for scrolling with the mouse wheel -- don&#039;t even think about it. It&#039;s possible I&#039;m using an old version though. Of course, I don&#039;t have the rights to upgrade my software at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a religious EditPlus 2 user until I wanted to edit Unicode files &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t support Unicode or UTF8 (little surprised that Ian didn&#8217;t mention that in his otherwise comprehensive comparison). I now use Ultra Edit, which is not bad, but not the nicest UI. Can&#8217;t understand why anyone would want to use TextPad &#8212; I am forced to use it at work, and it is unfeasibly slow to load and as for scrolling with the mouse wheel &#8212; don&#8217;t even think about it. It&#8217;s possible I&#8217;m using an old version though. Of course, I don&#8217;t have the rights to upgrade my software at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Horning</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8884</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Horning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8884</guid>
		<description>I second the XEmacs comment. My entire work day is rarely spent outside the app, and even although powerful, it&#039;s still fast. There&#039;s a web-browser, IRC client, practically an .el(emacs lisp) addon for everything in it. :) Great package, simplicity, I&#039;m not so sure about, the tutorial it comes with does an excellent job of introducing, and there&#039;s plent of docs and even more packages for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the XEmacs comment. My entire work day is rarely spent outside the app, and even although powerful, it&#8217;s still fast. There&#8217;s a web-browser, IRC client, practically an .el(emacs lisp) addon for everything in it. :) Great package, simplicity, I&#8217;m not so sure about, the tutorial it comes with does an excellent job of introducing, and there&#8217;s plent of docs and even more packages for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>Metapad is a nice little NP replacement with developers and every day users in mind. http://www.liquidninja.com/metapad -- oh and I typically use it for my first drafts for creative writing projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metapad is a nice little NP replacement with developers and every day users in mind. <a href="http://www.liquidninja.com/metapad" rel="nofollow">http://www.liquidninja.com/metapad</a> &#8212; oh and I typically use it for my first drafts for creative writing projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8882</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8882</guid>
		<description>notetab is nice, but cluttered, and no real utf-8 support that i can find :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notetab is nice, but cluttered, and no real utf-8 support that i can find :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8881</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8881</guid>
		<description>I have recently started using the e text editor (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-texteditor.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.e-texteditor.com&lt;/a&gt;) which has a very simple interface but is really fast, even with large files. It&#039;s interface is very similar to firefox with tabs and incremental search, but what really impressed me about it was its visual undo. I have never seen anything like that in another text editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently started using the e text editor (<a href="http://www.e-texteditor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.e-texteditor.com</a>) which has a very simple interface but is really fast, even with large files. It&#8217;s interface is very similar to firefox with tabs and incremental search, but what really impressed me about it was its visual undo. I have never seen anything like that in another text editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace Macleod</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace Macleod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe none of you have used XEmacs...Yes it was initially a Unix program, but it&#039;s marvelous on Windows... and is fast and accurate...I code everything in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe none of you have used XEmacs&#8230;Yes it was initially a Unix program, but it&#8217;s marvelous on Windows&#8230; and is fast and accurate&#8230;I code everything in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>sorry: addendum â JEdit does support PCRE type regexâŠ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry: addendum â JEdit does support PCRE type regexâŠ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8877</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8877</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, here goes (I&#039;ve demoed a bunch). OK my requirements for a good editor are: solid handling of UTF-8; fold coding if possible; RegEx search and PCRE RegEx if possible; ideally FTP built-in (with the ability to have FTP view docked in an explorer type pane if possible); customisable code completion; &lt;strong&gt;important: solid font rendering!&lt;/strong&gt;, the editor MUST allow display using all available fonts - monospace fonts are not sufficient for editing plain text and rendering must make use of proper hinting/smoothing to maximise legibility.

Here we go:

1. UltraEdit: Very solid editor, just added folding. I don&#039;t like the way to manage syntax highlighting. Fonts don&#039;t get hinted, and FTP can&#039;t be viewed in a pane. Otherwise good (though a bit ugly visually!)

2. PSPad: Wonderful interface, very good feature set. BUT rendered useless by awful font rendering (only monospace fonts with occasional glyph errors) and problems with editing UTF-8 and non UTF-8 encodings together. A real shame it is not the dev&#039;s fault but he uses an editor component which has these limitations.

3. SciTE / Notepad2 (both based on scintilla): The BEST looking syntax highlighting, great code completion, folding; a brilliant editor component. I love SciTE as it is fast and powerful. But neither one has FTP.

4. EditPlus 2: solid editor, syntax highlighting can be flaky sometimes, FTP support good though it is not multi-threaded. Font display is superb - allows 5 fonts to be setup and switched. Everything is solid, but nothing is exceptional.

5. Crimson Editor: basically a clone of EditPlus2, though a good clone at that. My only problem is that FTP is not viewable in a pane. Great feature is line-spacing; there is good evidence to show that bigger line-spacing improves legibility and reading comprehension, yet ALL editors only ever set 100% line-spacing - in crimson editor it is adjustable - kudos to the dev on that!

6. Topstyle 3: Amazing for CSS, good for XHTML, but not a workhorse editor, none of the solid encoding support etc I need.

7. Homesite: I have a registered version from a Dreamweaver install. I just don&#039;t understand what is so amazing. Must have been great when it first came out though...

8. JEdit: Very powerful and solid. FTP handling superb. Lots of raw editing power and extensible close to the point of self-sentience! Only gripes are font-smoothing is not as good as native methods, and slow to start.

Conclusions: No editor has yet to satisfy my needs! I&#039;ll stick with CrimsonEditor (faster) and JEdit (power) - though FTP explorer of editplus may draw me to the &quot;original&quot;! No editor seems to support PCRE regex which is really annoying, they all use different variations :grrr:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, here goes (I&#8217;ve demoed a bunch). OK my requirements for a good editor are: solid handling of UTF-8; fold coding if possible; RegEx search and PCRE RegEx if possible; ideally FTP built-in (with the ability to have FTP view docked in an explorer type pane if possible); customisable code completion; <strong>important: solid font rendering!</strong>, the editor MUST allow display using all available fonts &#8211; monospace fonts are not sufficient for editing plain text and rendering must make use of proper hinting/smoothing to maximise legibility.</p>
<p>Here we go:</p>
<p>1. UltraEdit: Very solid editor, just added folding. I don&#8217;t like the way to manage syntax highlighting. Fonts don&#8217;t get hinted, and FTP can&#8217;t be viewed in a pane. Otherwise good (though a bit ugly visually!)</p>
<p>2. PSPad: Wonderful interface, very good feature set. BUT rendered useless by awful font rendering (only monospace fonts with occasional glyph errors) and problems with editing UTF-8 and non UTF-8 encodings together. A real shame it is not the dev&#8217;s fault but he uses an editor component which has these limitations.</p>
<p>3. SciTE / Notepad2 (both based on scintilla): The BEST looking syntax highlighting, great code completion, folding; a brilliant editor component. I love SciTE as it is fast and powerful. But neither one has FTP.</p>
<p>4. EditPlus 2: solid editor, syntax highlighting can be flaky sometimes, FTP support good though it is not multi-threaded. Font display is superb &#8211; allows 5 fonts to be setup and switched. Everything is solid, but nothing is exceptional.</p>
<p>5. Crimson Editor: basically a clone of EditPlus2, though a good clone at that. My only problem is that FTP is not viewable in a pane. Great feature is line-spacing; there is good evidence to show that bigger line-spacing improves legibility and reading comprehension, yet ALL editors only ever set 100% line-spacing &#8211; in crimson editor it is adjustable &#8211; kudos to the dev on that!</p>
<p>6. Topstyle 3: Amazing for CSS, good for XHTML, but not a workhorse editor, none of the solid encoding support etc I need.</p>
<p>7. Homesite: I have a registered version from a Dreamweaver install. I just don&#8217;t understand what is so amazing. Must have been great when it first came out though&#8230;</p>
<p>8. JEdit: Very powerful and solid. FTP handling superb. Lots of raw editing power and extensible close to the point of self-sentience! Only gripes are font-smoothing is not as good as native methods, and slow to start.</p>
<p>Conclusions: No editor has yet to satisfy my needs! I&#8217;ll stick with CrimsonEditor (faster) and JEdit (power) &#8211; though FTP explorer of editplus may draw me to the &#8220;original&#8221;! No editor seems to support PCRE regex which is really annoying, they all use different variations :grrr:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamal</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8876</guid>
		<description>Notetab is great.  Lite version is free, Std. &amp; Pro have more features at a very low price.

http://www.notetab.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notetab is great.  Lite version is free, Std. &#038; Pro have more features at a very low price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.notetab.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.notetab.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8875</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8875</guid>
		<description>I second redredkroovy&#039;s vote.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editpadlite.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EditPad Lite&lt;/a&gt; does the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second redredkroovy&#8217;s vote.  <a href="http://www.editpadlite.com/" rel="nofollow">EditPad Lite</a> does the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Kyburz</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Kyburz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8874</guid>
		<description>Crimson Editor for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crimson Editor for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matizha</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8873</link>
		<dc:creator>Matizha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8873</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve been using textpad (textpad.com) for couple years now. i haven&#039;t tried anything else ever since. it just does anything i want. lines merging, search in multiple files or in a folder, text highlighting for every single language there is and, it&#039;s the fastest program i&#039;ve seen.

ps: i used to work with jEdit cause it had a nice UI but it was just too slow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been using textpad (textpad.com) for couple years now. i haven&#8217;t tried anything else ever since. it just does anything i want. lines merging, search in multiple files or in a folder, text highlighting for every single language there is and, it&#8217;s the fastest program i&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>ps: i used to work with jEdit cause it had a nice UI but it was just too slow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyroneking</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8872</link>
		<dc:creator>tyroneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8872</guid>
		<description>I have to have Unicode support, so Notepad is OK (Wordpad is not) but I much prefer Textpad which does have Unicode support. That said, Textpad could do with a major revision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to have Unicode support, so Notepad is OK (Wordpad is not) but I much prefer Textpad which does have Unicode support. That said, Textpad could do with a major revision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8871</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Notepad2.  It has syntax highlighting, which is essential for web editing and starts no slower than notepad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Notepad2.  It has syntax highlighting, which is essential for web editing and starts no slower than notepad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>Crimson Editor looks pretty good. I&#039;ll try it out over the next few weeks. Blog templates on my site use straight XSL, so that&#039;s my current modus operandi as I create new templates for users to play with. That and CSS. I&#039;d love to find a totally free replacement to EditPlus. I&#039;m glad to see there are a jillion syntax files for CE, just as EditPlus has. While XSL and CSS are what I&#039;m doing most right now, I use EditPlus for many file types and I don&#039;t think I&#039;d be able to switch without that flexibility.

I actually only started using EditPlus because HomeSite 4.1 was doing this really annoying thing where it would nuke the contents of a file /during a save/. I stopped using it for a bit until I could upgrade to version 5, but by that time I was hooked on EditPlus.

I especially like EditPlus&#039; backup feature. It&#039;s vital for me when working on remote FTP files. When you hit Ctrl-S, it first makes a local backup of what you are saving into a backup directory and /then/ tries to upload it. That has saved me so many times when the upload has either timed out, or failed mid-upload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crimson Editor looks pretty good. I&#8217;ll try it out over the next few weeks. Blog templates on my site use straight XSL, so that&#8217;s my current modus operandi as I create new templates for users to play with. That and CSS. I&#8217;d love to find a totally free replacement to EditPlus. I&#8217;m glad to see there are a jillion syntax files for CE, just as EditPlus has. While XSL and CSS are what I&#8217;m doing most right now, I use EditPlus for many file types and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be able to switch without that flexibility.</p>
<p>I actually only started using EditPlus because HomeSite 4.1 was doing this really annoying thing where it would nuke the contents of a file /during a save/. I stopped using it for a bit until I could upgrade to version 5, but by that time I was hooked on EditPlus.</p>
<p>I especially like EditPlus&#8217; backup feature. It&#8217;s vital for me when working on remote FTP files. When you hit Ctrl-S, it first makes a local backup of what you are saving into a backup directory and /then/ tries to upload it. That has saved me so many times when the upload has either timed out, or failed mid-upload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Minard</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Minard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8869</guid>
		<description>Right now I have become content with Crimson Editor.

I tried EditPlus, but it kept f*cking up the syntax highlighting on comments in PHP

I tried a few of the others, but they were a little slow and ackward.

I have the issue of wanting a program that can handle HTML, PHP, and CSS very nicely when it&#039;s all in a single file - which is aparently difficult to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now I have become content with Crimson Editor.</p>
<p>I tried EditPlus, but it kept f*cking up the syntax highlighting on comments in PHP</p>
<p>I tried a few of the others, but they were a little slow and ackward.</p>
<p>I have the issue of wanting a program that can handle HTML, PHP, and CSS very nicely when it&#8217;s all in a single file &#8211; which is aparently difficult to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Bord</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8868</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Bord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8868</guid>
		<description>One more for Editplus ( http://editplus.com/ ). The toolbar holds everything for HTML composing, and there are loads of very handy keyboard shortcuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more for Editplus ( <a href="http://editplus.com/" rel="nofollow">http://editplus.com/</a> ). The toolbar holds everything for HTML composing, and there are loads of very handy keyboard shortcuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minghong</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8867</link>
		<dc:creator>minghong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8867</guid>
		<description>Try Crimson Editor if you like EditPlus. It&#039;s almost a dupe of EditPlus, but more powerful and more importantly: free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Crimson Editor if you like EditPlus. It&#8217;s almost a dupe of EditPlus, but more powerful and more importantly: free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>EditPlus. Fast, simple, extensible, intuitive, and packed with functionality that&#039;s not in your face. There are syntax highlighting and auto-complete&#039;s for practical everything you can think of from DOS batch files to C# code to ASM to VRML. I could go on and on and on about the kinds of time it saves me and the really slick things about it. Suffice to say, your comparison won&#039;t be complete without giving this one a thorough look-see for yourself.

I can&#039;t say the UI is slick like SmartFTP or something right out of VS.Net 2005, but it&#039;s not Windows 3.1 for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EditPlus. Fast, simple, extensible, intuitive, and packed with functionality that&#8217;s not in your face. There are syntax highlighting and auto-complete&#8217;s for practical everything you can think of from DOS batch files to C# code to ASM to VRML. I could go on and on and on about the kinds of time it saves me and the really slick things about it. Suffice to say, your comparison won&#8217;t be complete without giving this one a thorough look-see for yourself.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say the UI is slick like SmartFTP or something right out of VS.Net 2005, but it&#8217;s not Windows 3.1 for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8865</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8865</guid>
		<description>You really need only one; TextPad http://www.textpad.com/
And stop whining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really need only one; TextPad <a href="http://www.textpad.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.textpad.com/</a><br />
And stop whining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Nutter</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8864</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Nutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8864</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/SciTEDownload.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SciTE - Scintilla Text Editor&lt;/a&gt; is my choice on Windows.


It is simple to use but difficult to configure (i.e. configuration is done through a conf file with all the options being shown) however, out of the box it is very usable.

I use it to edit PHP, HTML, CSS, C++, Fortran, Text.

Of course it is free (gratis and libre).

I used the installer from &lt;a href=&quot;http://gnuwin.epfl.ch/apps/SciTE/en/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gnuwin.epfl.ch/apps/SciTE/en/index.html&lt;/a&gt; but it is not the most recent version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/SciTEDownload.html" rel="nofollow">SciTE &#8211; Scintilla Text Editor</a> is my choice on Windows.</p>
<p>It is simple to use but difficult to configure (i.e. configuration is done through a conf file with all the options being shown) however, out of the box it is very usable.</p>
<p>I use it to edit PHP, HTML, CSS, C++, Fortran, Text.</p>
<p>Of course it is free (gratis and libre).</p>
<p>I used the installer from <a href="http://gnuwin.epfl.ch/apps/SciTE/en/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://gnuwin.epfl.ch/apps/SciTE/en/index.html</a> but it is not the most recent version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8863</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8863</guid>
		<description>I have to throw another vote in there for jEdit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to throw another vote in there for jEdit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Cotton</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>I didcovered PSPad from http://www.pspad.com

It&#039;s the best I&#039;ve found so far.

It&#039;s freeware, is stable in my win98SE box, has all the features I need and then *MANY* more.

It also has built in FTP which I find myself using more and more. 

It word wraps correctly and will even display the edited file in a browser using a localhost server.

My 2 cents...  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didcovered PSPad from <a href="http://www.pspad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pspad.com</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best I&#8217;ve found so far.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s freeware, is stable in my win98SE box, has all the features I need and then *MANY* more.</p>
<p>It also has built in FTP which I find myself using more and more. </p>
<p>It word wraps correctly and will even display the edited file in a browser using a localhost server.</p>
<p>My 2 cents&#8230;  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used &lt;a href=&quot;http://textpad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TextPad&lt;/a&gt; for over a year and really like it.  Light footprint, customizable syntax highlighting, and optional tabbing of open documents -- among other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used <a href="http://textpad.com" rel="nofollow">TextPad</a> for over a year and really like it.  Light footprint, customizable syntax highlighting, and optional tabbing of open documents &#8212; among other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crano</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8859</link>
		<dc:creator>Crano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8859</guid>
		<description>I highly recomend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradsoft.com/topstyle/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TopStyle3&lt;/a&gt;! It is easy to use, and a dream for css!!!
There is also Textpad as well... but TopStyle is the BOMB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly recomend <a href="http://www.bradsoft.com/topstyle/" rel="nofollow">TopStyle3</a>! It is easy to use, and a dream for css!!!<br />
There is also Textpad as well&#8230; but TopStyle is the BOMB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Czepiel</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Czepiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>When i find myself stranded on a PC Context is my best friend. Very reminiscent in layout of old-school &quot;Homesite&quot;

http://www.context.cx/

You&#039;ll thank yourself for giving it a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i find myself stranded on a PC Context is my best friend. Very reminiscent in layout of old-school &#8220;Homesite&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.context.cx/" rel="nofollow">http://www.context.cx/</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll thank yourself for giving it a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redredkroovy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8857</link>
		<dc:creator>redredkroovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8857</guid>
		<description>How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editpadpro.com/editpadlite.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EditPad Lite&lt;/a&gt;?

Its got tabs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about <a href="http://www.editpadpro.com/editpadlite.html" rel="nofollow">EditPad Lite</a>?</p>
<p>Its got tabs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mubs</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8856</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using UltraEdit for years, and after trying many other pieces of software always end up back at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using UltraEdit for years, and after trying many other pieces of software always end up back at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>Nothing compares to EditPlus (http://editplus.com). Nothing. JEdit is a sick joke in comparison. EditPlus is fast and feature-packed. I&#039;ve been using it for about 7 years when I code in Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing compares to EditPlus (<a href="http://editplus.com)" rel="nofollow">http://editplus.com)</a>. Nothing. JEdit is a sick joke in comparison. EditPlus is fast and feature-packed. I&#8217;ve been using it for about 7 years when I code in Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: username</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/01/text_editors_for_windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8854</link>
		<dc:creator>username</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1159#comment-8854</guid>
		<description>PFE rocks use it everyday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PFE rocks use it everyday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
