Comments on: Pentium 630: Early Review http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/02/pentium_630_early_review/ Nerds are for Dorks Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:15:36 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: MacGeek http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/02/pentium_630_early_review/comment-page-1/#comment-9257 MacGeek Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:10:11 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1185#comment-9257 It's been corrected. It’s been corrected.

]]> By: ScottyWH http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/02/pentium_630_early_review/comment-page-1/#comment-9256 ScottyWH Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:41:13 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1185#comment-9256 LOL, Tim, I was just popping in to point out that very same thing... pre = before :+) LOL, Tim, I was just popping in to point out that very same thing…

pre = before

:+)

]]> By: Tim G http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/02/pentium_630_early_review/comment-page-1/#comment-9255 Tim G Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:41:55 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1185#comment-9255 Er.. I think you mean "successor," not "predecessor." :) Er.. I think you mean “successor,” not “predecessor.”

:)

]]>