Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
An article in InfoWorld discusses whether Longhorn will have enough compelling features to convince users of Windows systems to upgrade. The article goes into details about why it is difficult for Microsoft to create a best of breed anything and it seems that the answer is they are just too big.
In my non-expert opinion, Microsoft would be best served broken up into pieces and let the individual pieces go along and innovate. Once you create this huge monster that just continues to grow and grow it has to move slower and slower while the little competition can more readily move around and adjust to the market’s habits.
Longhorn will be good, because Microsoft has gotten increasingly better with each iteration of Windows (with the exception of ME) and having this one fail would be no less than a total disaster. However, they are still safe (yes, you can be safe from a total disaster) because many firms are still not convinced of moving to Linux. If that ever occurs and Linux reaches the tipping point in IT conversion then we can again begin to have fun and ridicule the new open source monopoly.
Defining the Game
Microsoft to Release 20 Versions of Windows Vista
Apple’s Latest, Good For Linux, Bad For Microsoft
How Microsoft Can Embrace Linux
What Microsoft Should Do With All That Cash
Forever Geek is a resource for all things geek. You can stay tuned by having the latest FG news delivered to you for free via RSS.
Category: Uncategorized
Tags:
Five concept watch designs that make you calculate the time
Steam: Diplomacy of Digital Downloads over Retail Boxes
Best of CES 2010 (Part One): 3DTV, Audio, Display, Processors, Gadgets
A Decade of Zombies IV: Epidemic Rooted in Society
2 Responses for "Why Microsoft Should Break Up"
March 21st, 2005 at 15:46
1I respectfully disagree with MS breaking up. This large “monster” needs to be large to keep gaining the market. If MS was to break-up into several smaller companies, then a unified support structure would collapse. MS strongest asset right now is the support function. JMHO…
March 21st, 2005 at 18:09
2What Microsoft needs to do is chop it’s tail. I’m sure Longhorn will still support programs that run on Windows 3.1. They need to take one leap forward or continue to patch their current OS. Cut it off at Windows 2k and above, and although people might be reluctant to move, it will get rid of some of the bloat, memory leaks and other crap that keeps it dragging.
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply