<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird Not As Successful As Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: penpal</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10568</link>
		<dc:creator>penpal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10568</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird is slow in both receiving and sending. The spell checker stinks and I agree they need to improve the address book features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird is slow in both receiving and sending. The spell checker stinks and I agree they need to improve the address book features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coos</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10567</link>
		<dc:creator>Coos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 01:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10567</guid>
		<description>I was using Outlook with no bother at all and have been for a few years now. I love the easy-to-use, feature-rich styles that M$ so often present us with.

That said, I have (over the last year) begun looking into e-mail marketing and full and professionally designed html emails only to be horrified by the code Outlook (via Word) creates. It&#039;s good for absolutely nowt!

The thing that brings me here today is that I was recently required to make use of Exchange Server&#039;s shared tasks and contacts (because M$&#039;s Web Access is WELL POO and doesn&#039;t support most of their own features, like CATEGORIES!).

I had to remove ALL of my POP email accounts (as a web master for many sites this was NOT cool), install the Exchange account and then re-install the POP accounts and reload the emails from an archive.

This created duplicate emails EVERYWHERE, meant that I HAD to be connected to the Exchange server over VPN to get ANY mail (POP or MX) to arrive, I had to re-do ALL my signatures AND just to top it all off my rules and alerts stopped working!!!!

Needless to say I saw this as a great time to move across.

As I was with Firefox when I first started using it, all I wanted to do was run back to the arms of Outlook to what I was familiar with, but NO!

I am already starting to feel more comfortable with Thunderbird and am convinced it&#039;s the right move in the long run.

Linux OS next? :S

*****     *****
&lt;strong&gt;I AM, however getting Word generated &#039;html&#039; emails (I use the term lightly) that are displaying the full page of code from the HTML tag to the closing HTML (or whatever M$ prints...)&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;This is ONLY happening with Word generated mail. Anyone know how to stop this?&lt;/strong&gt;
*****     *****

Thumbs up Mozilla! ;)

&quot;In a World with no doors or walls, why do we need Windows and Gates?&quot; &lt;em&gt;Anon.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using Outlook with no bother at all and have been for a few years now. I love the easy-to-use, feature-rich styles that M$ so often present us with.</p>
<p>That said, I have (over the last year) begun looking into e-mail marketing and full and professionally designed html emails only to be horrified by the code Outlook (via Word) creates. It&#8217;s good for absolutely nowt!</p>
<p>The thing that brings me here today is that I was recently required to make use of Exchange Server&#8217;s shared tasks and contacts (because M$&#8217;s Web Access is WELL POO and doesn&#8217;t support most of their own features, like CATEGORIES!).</p>
<p>I had to remove ALL of my POP email accounts (as a web master for many sites this was NOT cool), install the Exchange account and then re-install the POP accounts and reload the emails from an archive.</p>
<p>This created duplicate emails EVERYWHERE, meant that I HAD to be connected to the Exchange server over VPN to get ANY mail (POP or MX) to arrive, I had to re-do ALL my signatures AND just to top it all off my rules and alerts stopped working!!!!</p>
<p>Needless to say I saw this as a great time to move across.</p>
<p>As I was with Firefox when I first started using it, all I wanted to do was run back to the arms of Outlook to what I was familiar with, but NO!</p>
<p>I am already starting to feel more comfortable with Thunderbird and am convinced it&#8217;s the right move in the long run.</p>
<p>Linux OS next? :S</p>
<p>*****     *****<br />
<strong>I AM, however getting Word generated &#8216;html&#8217; emails (I use the term lightly) that are displaying the full page of code from the HTML tag to the closing HTML (or whatever M$ prints&#8230;)</strong></p>
<p><strong>This is ONLY happening with Word generated mail. Anyone know how to stop this?</strong><br />
*****     *****</p>
<p>Thumbs up Mozilla! ;)</p>
<p>&#8220;In a World with no doors or walls, why do we need Windows and Gates?&#8221; <em>Anon.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outlook express errors</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10566</link>
		<dc:creator>outlook express errors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 12:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10566</guid>
		<description>I have been using Outlook Express errors repair tool  for the past few months and LOVE it.
I&#039;ve even recommended it to all my friends. Outlook Express more stable and secure than other programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Outlook Express errors repair tool  for the past few months and LOVE it.<br />
I&#8217;ve even recommended it to all my friends. Outlook Express more stable and secure than other programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10565</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10565</guid>
		<description>There are Extensions for Firebird as well as Firefox.
A useable Calendar as well as a Contacts Sidebar F4 turns it off and on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are Extensions for Firebird as well as Firefox.<br />
A useable Calendar as well as a Contacts Sidebar F4 turns it off and on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linopus</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10564</link>
		<dc:creator>Linopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10564</guid>
		<description>I started to use TB since version 0.9. Before that the conversion OE -&gt; TB didn&#039;t work properly, especially with date formating. So since dec 04 I switched completly to TB 0.9 on my W2K laptop. I love the prg for autocleaning the spams (the most come from the US,everone knows that they are the number 1 of spammakers) and for the extentions. I configured even the addressbook like OE in the sidebar. This week I did a test to upgrade to the latest version and  to migrate to pc with XP and it worked from the first shot. The purpose of learning to change profiles and moving TB to another pc/OS version is that I want to migrate to linux. So far I succeeded for openoffice and firefox, my favorite prgs. But I have a struggle with migrating TB. I have been reading docs on sharing win and linux TB mail folder or migrating from win to mac but couldn&#039;t find usefull info for migrating TB to linux. Does anyone have experience or tips on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started to use TB since version 0.9. Before that the conversion OE -> TB didn&#8217;t work properly, especially with date formating. So since dec 04 I switched completly to TB 0.9 on my W2K laptop. I love the prg for autocleaning the spams (the most come from the US,everone knows that they are the number 1 of spammakers) and for the extentions. I configured even the addressbook like OE in the sidebar. This week I did a test to upgrade to the latest version and  to migrate to pc with XP and it worked from the first shot. The purpose of learning to change profiles and moving TB to another pc/OS version is that I want to migrate to linux. So far I succeeded for openoffice and firefox, my favorite prgs. But I have a struggle with migrating TB. I have been reading docs on sharing win and linux TB mail folder or migrating from win to mac but couldn&#8217;t find usefull info for migrating TB to linux. Does anyone have experience or tips on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10563</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really noticed any difference in speed of mail downloads. I would assume it depends on the type of server/service you are connecting to (pop3, imap, etc.) and the speed of your connection.

If you are using Outlook in a corporate setting with Exchange, you aren&#039;t going to get any faster than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really noticed any difference in speed of mail downloads. I would assume it depends on the type of server/service you are connecting to (pop3, imap, etc.) and the speed of your connection.</p>
<p>If you are using Outlook in a corporate setting with Exchange, you aren&#8217;t going to get any faster than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deon</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10562</link>
		<dc:creator>Deon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10562</guid>
		<description>Can you someone please advise how I can make my thunderbird faster to download emails. I first liked it because of its cool search function and its news and blogs features. However, because it&#039;s just damn slow, I switched back to Outlook (I lost several emails in the process )...

Help@!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you someone please advise how I can make my thunderbird faster to download emails. I first liked it because of its cool search function and its news and blogs features. However, because it&#8217;s just damn slow, I switched back to Outlook (I lost several emails in the process )&#8230;</p>
<p>Help@!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banks</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10561</link>
		<dc:creator>Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10561</guid>
		<description>I use Thunderbird at home, and think it&#039;s great! However, the only thing that keeps me from fully ditching Outlook is the calendaring and contact management. I use these daily. Keep hoping they will bundle this with Thunderbird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Thunderbird at home, and think it&#8217;s great! However, the only thing that keeps me from fully ditching Outlook is the calendaring and contact management. I use these daily. Keep hoping they will bundle this with Thunderbird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10560</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10560</guid>
		<description>Mike, if you haven&#039;t already, try compacting all folders after clearing out your trash. It speeded up my thunderbird a little-- especially when searching a folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, if you haven&#8217;t already, try compacting all folders after clearing out your trash. It speeded up my thunderbird a little&#8211; especially when searching a folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10559</guid>
		<description>Josh, were you using Outlook to connect to an Exchange server, or just using it as a POP client?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, were you using Outlook to connect to an Exchange server, or just using it as a POP client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10558</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10558</guid>
		<description>I switched from Outlook. I like Thunderbird much more. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched from Outlook. I like Thunderbird much more. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof Harries</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10557</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof Harries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10557</guid>
		<description>When Thunderbird 1.0 first came out on OS X, I ran it for about a month. After a while I missed the message rendering, address book integration and inline spell checking of Mail.app and went back.

Just the other day I downloaded 1.0.2 hoping that Mozilla had created some kind of Import function for Mac users on Mail.app. Nope - still not there. The thought of manually transferring 2500+ messages and 35+ mailboxes is not my idea of a fun time. I did it once and once was enough. When Thunderbird is finally released with a proper import tool for OS X users, then I&#039;ll come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Thunderbird 1.0 first came out on OS X, I ran it for about a month. After a while I missed the message rendering, address book integration and inline spell checking of Mail.app and went back.</p>
<p>Just the other day I downloaded 1.0.2 hoping that Mozilla had created some kind of Import function for Mac users on Mail.app. Nope &#8211; still not there. The thought of manually transferring 2500+ messages and 35+ mailboxes is not my idea of a fun time. I did it once and once was enough. When Thunderbird is finally released with a proper import tool for OS X users, then I&#8217;ll come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10556</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10556</guid>
		<description>I just moved from a dell to a powerbook, and initially used Thunderbird on the mac because I was familiar with it.  Now I&#039;ve switched to the  mac Mail app just becuase it integrates better into my system, even though I lost alot of mail in the process.  I&#039;m just curious as to why you switched to mail.app so quickly when moving to a mac.  Also, does anyone know how mail.app&#039;s junk mail filtering compairs to thunderbird&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just moved from a dell to a powerbook, and initially used Thunderbird on the mac because I was familiar with it.  Now I&#8217;ve switched to the  mac Mail app just becuase it integrates better into my system, even though I lost alot of mail in the process.  I&#8217;m just curious as to why you switched to mail.app so quickly when moving to a mac.  Also, does anyone know how mail.app&#8217;s junk mail filtering compairs to thunderbird&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10555</guid>
		<description>I made the switch as soon as they added the capability to use shared folders - version 0.8 I think?

I used to use Outlook 2003 and made use of it&#039;s calendar and tasks quite frequently.  But I&#039;ve since started using Basecamp to handle all that stuff.

I find Thunderbird to be super light-weight.  After importing my emails from Outlook, the total size of the data file that contained them was around 80mb, where it was over 400mb when in Outlook format.  Yikes!

Gotta love being able to use CSS in email as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the switch as soon as they added the capability to use shared folders &#8211; version 0.8 I think?</p>
<p>I used to use Outlook 2003 and made use of it&#8217;s calendar and tasks quite frequently.  But I&#8217;ve since started using Basecamp to handle all that stuff.</p>
<p>I find Thunderbird to be super light-weight.  After importing my emails from Outlook, the total size of the data file that contained them was around 80mb, where it was over 400mb when in Outlook format.  Yikes!</p>
<p>Gotta love being able to use CSS in email as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minghong</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10554</link>
		<dc:creator>minghong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10554</guid>
		<description>I switched from Mozilla/Netscape suite. So... did I switch? Probably not. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched from Mozilla/Netscape suite. So&#8230; did I switch? Probably not. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10553</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha, reminds me of the essay about automation an albinoblacksheep.com, actualy a good read if you get the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha, reminds me of the essay about automation an albinoblacksheep.com, actualy a good read if you get the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10552</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10552</guid>
		<description>BTW, who else thinks its funny that my artcile on Thunderbird, and e-mail client, has prompted google to send a bunch of ads about Thunderbird, the Ford sedan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, who else thinks its funny that my artcile on Thunderbird, and e-mail client, has prompted google to send a bunch of ads about Thunderbird, the Ford sedan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10551</guid>
		<description>If you configure an Exchange server to support/use POP3 and IMAP incoming mail services, then you can use Thunderbird with an Exchange server.

Exchange, by default, uses a proprietary Microsoft format.

The only thing running something like Thunderbird on Exchange is you are missing out on public calendars, contacts, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you configure an Exchange server to support/use POP3 and IMAP incoming mail services, then you can use Thunderbird with an Exchange server.</p>
<p>Exchange, by default, uses a proprietary Microsoft format.</p>
<p>The only thing running something like Thunderbird on Exchange is you are missing out on public calendars, contacts, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10550</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10550</guid>
		<description>I think Scrivs hit the nail on the head, it is Microsoft Exchange that is holding Thunderbird back. Corperations and institutions (at least in the U.S.) depend on email to function, Exchange keeps all the mail on a (or a group of) central server(s)(aside from archived messages) so it is much easier to secure and manage.

If an OSS project could be (or has been) created that provided the same function, or even worked better (lets face it, it&#039;s Microsoft) Linux would have a real fighting chance in the workplace. Really, to me, it looks like one of the last hurdles for the OSS community is to provide stable easy to use &quot;user-prof&quot; applications, this is one of those. (I know MS dosn&#039;t do the same... but that is a diffrent comment.)

P.S. Still looking for a 3rd party Exchange client... just for giggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Scrivs hit the nail on the head, it is Microsoft Exchange that is holding Thunderbird back. Corperations and institutions (at least in the U.S.) depend on email to function, Exchange keeps all the mail on a (or a group of) central server(s)(aside from archived messages) so it is much easier to secure and manage.</p>
<p>If an OSS project could be (or has been) created that provided the same function, or even worked better (lets face it, it&#8217;s Microsoft) Linux would have a real fighting chance in the workplace. Really, to me, it looks like one of the last hurdles for the OSS community is to provide stable easy to use &#8220;user-prof&#8221; applications, this is one of those. (I know MS dosn&#8217;t do the same&#8230; but that is a diffrent comment.)</p>
<p>P.S. Still looking for a 3rd party Exchange client&#8230; just for giggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>I also think it is easier to switch to Firefox than Thunderbird. In a corporate environment where you aren&#039;t using IE applications you can just switch everyone over to Firefox along with their bookmarks with no hassle. However, when you have an address book and gigs of emails along with using an Exchange server that only supports certain features found in Outlook, then of course you are going to have a slower adaption.

And hell, most people use webmail anyways (which you use a broswer like Firefox to view).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it is easier to switch to Firefox than Thunderbird. In a corporate environment where you aren&#8217;t using IE applications you can just switch everyone over to Firefox along with their bookmarks with no hassle. However, when you have an address book and gigs of emails along with using an Exchange server that only supports certain features found in Outlook, then of course you are going to have a slower adaption.</p>
<p>And hell, most people use webmail anyways (which you use a broswer like Firefox to view).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P.</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/04/thunderbird_not_as_successful_as_firefox/#comment-10548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1459#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that Thunderbird gets really slow after while, to the point of slowing my machine down. This is usually solved by defragging. If Opera&#039;s M2 supported more mail features (perhaps html e-mails) I&#039;d use it in a heartbeat (the feedreader in Opera is a great plus).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that Thunderbird gets really slow after while, to the point of slowing my machine down. This is usually solved by defragging. If Opera&#8217;s M2 supported more mail features (perhaps html e-mails) I&#8217;d use it in a heartbeat (the feedreader in Opera is a great plus).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

