<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eWeek Thinks Opera Is #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15184</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 02:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15184</guid>
		<description>Obviously Opera is #1. They&#039;re recommended by a Power Ranger.

Seriously, though, Fx (Firefox is not abbreviated as FF) has an easier feel to it. All the extensions available also make it much more useful right now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Opera is #1. They&#8217;re recommended by a Power Ranger.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, Fx (Firefox is not abbreviated as FF) has an easier feel to it. All the extensions available also make it much more useful right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Horak</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15183</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Horak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15183</guid>
		<description>Weird. In my previous comment (#4) &lt;em&gt;s show up in the source but the text isn&#039;t emphasized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. In my previous comment (#4) &lt;em&gt;s show up in the source but the text isn&#8217;t emphasized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Horak</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Horak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15182</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I know there has been more than one occasion where I have closed a tab prematurely and forget where the url was pointing so I could definitely use this feature.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=436&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SessionSaver&lt;/a&gt; has this feature, which the extension calls SnapBack Tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I know there has been more than one occasion where I have closed a tab prematurely and forget where the url was pointing so I could definitely use this feature.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://addons.update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=436" rel="nofollow">SessionSaver</a> has this feature, which the extension calls SnapBack Tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15181</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 21:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15181</guid>
		<description>I loved Opera, but it was too high-strung. Cookie management, page incompatabilities, script issues, etc. FF does about 95% of what I need with fewer headaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Opera, but it was too high-strung. Cookie management, page incompatabilities, script issues, etc. FF does about 95% of what I need with fewer headaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim G</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15180</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15180</guid>
		<description>A feature I like in Opera 8 is the ability to fit the page to the browser window. It&#039;s one of those little features that make you go, &quot;Now why didn&#039;t somebody think of that before, and why don&#039;t all browsers do that?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A feature I like in Opera 8 is the ability to fit the page to the browser window. It&#8217;s one of those little features that make you go, &#8220;Now why didn&#8217;t somebody think of that before, and why don&#8217;t all browsers do that?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/eweek_thinks_opera_is_1/comment-page-1/#comment-15179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1604#comment-15179</guid>
		<description>One improvement opera did make is that they got rid of that nasty interface, with all the icons and stuff on the sidebar.

That had to be the worst part about using Opera to me. Sure, they could be turned off, but why were they on by default in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One improvement opera did make is that they got rid of that nasty interface, with all the icons and stuff on the sidebar.</p>
<p>That had to be the worst part about using Opera to me. Sure, they could be turned off, but why were they on by default in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
