<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Hits 2 Million Mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/comment-page-1/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1609#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My question is where did the other 50 million downloads go? Are users downloading Opera only to not like it and turn back to Firefox, IE, or some other browser?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
When I read this, I thought it was Asa &lt;em&gt;again&lt;/em&gt;.
There are Opera users and I am one of them. That does not mean I do not respect Firefox. I consider it really good but, &lt;em&gt;personally&lt;/em&gt;, searching for extensions is not funny (besides Firefox runs slower in my (a bit) old PC). I test my designs with Firefox too and I must admit that seldom (nearly never) it gives me any trouble.
Does Firefox users have nothing to do apart from talking about Opera?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My question is where did the other 50 million downloads go? Are users downloading Opera only to not like it and turn back to Firefox, IE, or some other browser?</p></blockquote>
<p>When I read this, I thought it was Asa <em>again</em>.<br />
There are Opera users and I am one of them. That does not mean I do not respect Firefox. I consider it really good but, <em>personally</em>, searching for extensions is not funny (besides Firefox runs slower in my (a bit) old PC). I test my designs with Firefox too and I must admit that seldom (nearly never) it gives me any trouble.<br />
Does Firefox users have nothing to do apart from talking about Opera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blah</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/comment-page-1/#comment-15354</link>
		<dc:creator>Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1609#comment-15354</guid>
		<description>If Firefox didn&#039;t exist Opera would certainly be my default browser. As it stands, I prefer Firefox&#039;s interface and the ability to easily customize it with a virtually endless array of extensions. I&#039;ve had Opera on my computer since version 7, but in truth I rarely use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Firefox didn&#8217;t exist Opera would certainly be my default browser. As it stands, I prefer Firefox&#8217;s interface and the ability to easily customize it with a virtually endless array of extensions. I&#8217;ve had Opera on my computer since version 7, but in truth I rarely use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/comment-page-1/#comment-15353</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 18:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1609#comment-15353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Opera as my primary browser for about 4 - 5 years and while Firefox, etc. have made great strides recently, I&#039;m sticking with Opera (despite having Safari, Camino, Firefox, Shiira, lynx, dillo, IE/Mac, IE/Win, etc. etc. etc. etc. at my fingertips).

Reasons:
1) Integrated email client boasting many of the same features that Gmail &quot;borrowed&quot; (sure, the Mozilla suite has an integrated email client too, but have you actually *used* that lumbering beast?)
2) Crazy fast page rendering
3) More ways to handle pages and tabs than you can shake a stick at (I&#039;m a web junkie ... I typically have at least 3 windows open, each with 30+ tabs )
4) Innovative features (small screen rendering, built in RSS/Atom reader and mouse gestures before -- I think -- just about anyone else, page zoom, fit page to screen, notes area, being able to undo closing a page, etc.)

Of course, if I&#039;m to be honest, there&#039;s a lot of things that I&#039;d still love to see:
1) A plug-in/extension architecture
2) Native XSLT support
3) Better JS handling and error reporting (though great strides have been made in this area recently)

Is Opera quirky and different? Yes. That&#039;s also part of what makes it so endearing. Is the interface a little cluttered? Yes, but in the same way that a swiss-army knife is cluttered ... you&#039;ve got a tool for every occasion. Would I switch if there was a better alternative? Yes, but I&#039;m still waiting for that day to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Opera as my primary browser for about 4 &#8211; 5 years and while Firefox, etc. have made great strides recently, I&#8217;m sticking with Opera (despite having Safari, Camino, Firefox, Shiira, lynx, dillo, IE/Mac, IE/Win, etc. etc. etc. etc. at my fingertips).</p>
<p>Reasons:<br />
1) Integrated email client boasting many of the same features that Gmail &#8220;borrowed&#8221; (sure, the Mozilla suite has an integrated email client too, but have you actually *used* that lumbering beast?)<br />
2) Crazy fast page rendering<br />
3) More ways to handle pages and tabs than you can shake a stick at (I&#8217;m a web junkie &#8230; I typically have at least 3 windows open, each with 30+ tabs )<br />
4) Innovative features (small screen rendering, built in RSS/Atom reader and mouse gestures before &#8212; I think &#8212; just about anyone else, page zoom, fit page to screen, notes area, being able to undo closing a page, etc.)</p>
<p>Of course, if I&#8217;m to be honest, there&#8217;s a lot of things that I&#8217;d still love to see:<br />
1) A plug-in/extension architecture<br />
2) Native XSLT support<br />
3) Better JS handling and error reporting (though great strides have been made in this area recently)</p>
<p>Is Opera quirky and different? Yes. That&#8217;s also part of what makes it so endearing. Is the interface a little cluttered? Yes, but in the same way that a swiss-army knife is cluttered &#8230; you&#8217;ve got a tool for every occasion. Would I switch if there was a better alternative? Yes, but I&#8217;m still waiting for that day to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/comment-page-1/#comment-15352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1609#comment-15352</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve downloaded Opera at least a dozen times since version 5(ish). Only used it for about half an hour in total though. Have never liked the interface, it always feels cluttered and unprofressional. I rarely even bother testing sites in it.

I downloaded v8 recently because I had a complaint about my website not working when I knew it worked in Firefox and IE.

I&#039;m going to stick to Firefox for the forseeable future I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve downloaded Opera at least a dozen times since version 5(ish). Only used it for about half an hour in total though. Have never liked the interface, it always feels cluttered and unprofressional. I rarely even bother testing sites in it.</p>
<p>I downloaded v8 recently because I had a complaint about my website not working when I knew it worked in Firefox and IE.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to stick to Firefox for the forseeable future I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/opera_hits_2_million_mark/comment-page-1/#comment-15351</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1609#comment-15351</guid>
		<description>Opera seems like a good browser, certainly it &#039;feels&#039; better this time around. Even so, it misses features that I like in Firefox - namely the ability to extend the product however I feel like.

Opera just doesn&#039;t do what I want it to do, and it feels untidy and cluttered. What&#039;s with the &#039;wand&#039; too? Call it what it is if you decide such a feature even has to have a name, but certainly don&#039;t give it some meaningless name.

I test layouts in Opera, but that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera seems like a good browser, certainly it &#8216;feels&#8217; better this time around. Even so, it misses features that I like in Firefox &#8211; namely the ability to extend the product however I feel like.</p>
<p>Opera just doesn&#8217;t do what I want it to do, and it feels untidy and cluttered. What&#8217;s with the &#8216;wand&#8217; too? Call it what it is if you decide such a feature even has to have a name, but certainly don&#8217;t give it some meaningless name.</p>
<p>I test layouts in Opera, but that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
