<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows x64 Lacks Major Anti-Virus Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnie</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14937</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14937</guid>
		<description>Hi people! Great job! 
&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; [url=][/url] 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi people! Great job!<br />
<a></a> [url=][/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoChop</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>PoChop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>And guys... Check out this site.. There&#039;s stuff out there..

http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=89&amp;Itemid=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And guys&#8230; Check out this site.. There&#8217;s stuff out there..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=89&#038;Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=89&#038;Itemid=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoChop</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14935</link>
		<dc:creator>PoChop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14935</guid>
		<description>I am running Avast on my x64 with zero problems. I realize it currently may not have the best detection engine, but if you combine it with Spyware like Webroot and use the MS firewall feature, you should be more than fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running Avast on my x64 with zero problems. I realize it currently may not have the best detection engine, but if you combine it with Spyware like Webroot and use the MS firewall feature, you should be more than fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suburbia</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14934</link>
		<dc:creator>Suburbia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14934</guid>
		<description>leeph, &quot;IT pro&quot; or not, no 6th sense is going to let you know about a well-designed trojan or worse, rootkit. 

Everyone should have a form of av defense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leeph, &#8220;IT pro&#8221; or not, no 6th sense is going to let you know about a well-designed trojan or worse, rootkit. </p>
<p>Everyone should have a form of av defense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 00:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>I am using NOD32 for now but do have a subscription to McAfee on my other PC&#039;s.
I think with enough pressure as in emails etc. McAfee and Norton will come around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using NOD32 for now but do have a subscription to McAfee on my other PC&#8217;s.<br />
I think with enough pressure as in emails etc. McAfee and Norton will come around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leeph</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14932</link>
		<dc:creator>leeph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14932</guid>
		<description>I used AVG on x32 until I changed to Win x64 - as I couldn&#039;t be arsed to pay for an AV, I simply chose never to use IE (use Firefox!) and I&#039;ve never contracted any malicious program... but then I am an IT professional and tend to just have a sixth sense about these things.

Screw AV, just get wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used AVG on x32 until I changed to Win x64 &#8211; as I couldn&#8217;t be arsed to pay for an AV, I simply chose never to use IE (use Firefox!) and I&#8217;ve never contracted any malicious program&#8230; but then I am an IT professional and tend to just have a sixth sense about these things.</p>
<p>Screw AV, just get wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV_Hog</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14931</link>
		<dc:creator>AV_Hog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14931</guid>
		<description>Mark how did you run Panda AV 2005 without errors?  I tried to run Titanium 2006, and it popped up saying it couldn&#039;t run it, unless it was written in such a manor so it wouldn&#039;t recognize 64 bit editions.

Symantec: Errors (not compatible)
Titanium 2006: Errors (same)
Haven&#039;t tried Avast or AVG, but that requires purchasing one or the other.

Apparently the Symantec Corporate 10.0 will support 64 bit, but I am getting tired of the residential BS that symantec tries to feed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark how did you run Panda AV 2005 without errors?  I tried to run Titanium 2006, and it popped up saying it couldn&#8217;t run it, unless it was written in such a manor so it wouldn&#8217;t recognize 64 bit editions.</p>
<p>Symantec: Errors (not compatible)<br />
Titanium 2006: Errors (same)<br />
Haven&#8217;t tried Avast or AVG, but that requires purchasing one or the other.</p>
<p>Apparently the Symantec Corporate 10.0 will support 64 bit, but I am getting tired of the residential BS that symantec tries to feed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azsh</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>azsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 19:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>I using eZ Trust Anti Virus at my x64 and always i got message error and restarted automatically. Should make a compatible anti virus huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I using eZ Trust Anti Virus at my x64 and always i got message error and restarted automatically. Should make a compatible anti virus huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code_rookie</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14929</link>
		<dc:creator>Code_rookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 04:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14929</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the overpaid knotheads at Symantec and McAfee ever stopped to think that anyone with half a brain isn&#039;t going to adopt 64 until there is virus protection for it.  I loaded it on my AMD64 3400 and I had never seen windows xp boot so fast but there is no way I was going to operate on the Net unprotected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the overpaid knotheads at Symantec and McAfee ever stopped to think that anyone with half a brain isn&#8217;t going to adopt 64 until there is virus protection for it.  I loaded it on my AMD64 3400 and I had never seen windows xp boot so fast but there is no way I was going to operate on the Net unprotected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14928</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 03:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14928</guid>
		<description>Dave, how are you running Symantec if it&#039;s not compatible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, how are you running Symantec if it&#8217;s not compatible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chase home finance</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14927</link>
		<dc:creator>chase home finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14927</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http:///ty2j.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chase home finance&lt;/a&gt; Keyword doesn&#039;t matter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http:///ty2j.com/" rel="nofollow">chase home finance</a> Keyword doesn&#8217;t matter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14926</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14926</guid>
		<description>Im running 64 bit windows with symantec antivirus and firewall - and three months without a glitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im running 64 bit windows with symantec antivirus and firewall &#8211; and three months without a glitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14925</guid>
		<description>eZ Trust antivirus is good, but again no realtime support.

Still searching for a realtime antivirus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eZ Trust antivirus is good, but again no realtime support.</p>
<p>Still searching for a realtime antivirus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14924</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14924</guid>
		<description>fsecure and sophos don&#039;t seem to work either. I am going to give avast a try. It&#039;s better than nothing. Personally, I imagine that the AV vendors are just waiting until crackers can come up with some good viruses and ruin our x64 experience. Then Norton et al. will come to the rescue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fsecure and sophos don&#8217;t seem to work either. I am going to give avast a try. It&#8217;s better than nothing. Personally, I imagine that the AV vendors are just waiting until crackers can come up with some good viruses and ruin our x64 experience. Then Norton et al. will come to the rescue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14923</guid>
		<description>I have this far tried to install many av softwares on xp 64 bit: results are below:

Norton 2005 : error message &quot;was not designed for this platform&quot;
Panda AV 2005 platinum: starts the installed and poofs - no error messages or nothing
Avast : installed and ran ok but seemed rather annoying and innefective
nod32 : installed but lacked realtime virus support

still to test :
trend, fsecure, others (suggestions?) I am currently running the xp 64 bit for testinbg - when I am done I will wipe and relaod so damage to the os isnt a big deal for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this far tried to install many av softwares on xp 64 bit: results are below:</p>
<p>Norton 2005 : error message &#8220;was not designed for this platform&#8221;<br />
Panda AV 2005 platinum: starts the installed and poofs &#8211; no error messages or nothing<br />
Avast : installed and ran ok but seemed rather annoying and innefective<br />
nod32 : installed but lacked realtime virus support</p>
<p>still to test :<br />
trend, fsecure, others (suggestions?) I am currently running the xp 64 bit for testinbg &#8211; when I am done I will wipe and relaod so damage to the os isnt a big deal for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14922</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14922</guid>
		<description>AVG will not work with x64, it will not install</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVG will not work with x64, it will not install</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduard Kucera</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduard Kucera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>avast! 4 antivirus is completetly compatible with x64 Windows (both workstation &amp; server). avast! 4 Home Edition is free for home non-commercial use. Be so kind and see:
http://www.avast.com/eng/x64.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>avast! 4 antivirus is completetly compatible with x64 Windows (both workstation &#038; server). avast! 4 Home Edition is free for home non-commercial use. Be so kind and see:<br />
<a href="http://www.avast.com/eng/x64.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.avast.com/eng/x64.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14920</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14920</guid>
		<description>part of the issue is probably the fact that AVs run partaly in 16 bit mode, and Windows x64 does not support a 16 bit compatibility mode... so the app. needs to be rewritten, that may take a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>part of the issue is probably the fact that AVs run partaly in 16 bit mode, and Windows x64 does not support a 16 bit compatibility mode&#8230; so the app. needs to be rewritten, that may take a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norgus</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14919</link>
		<dc:creator>norgus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 13:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14919</guid>
		<description>Yes I read that much. Can you still run say grisoft AVG and be fairly virus safe?

I couldnt care less if norton doesnt like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I read that much. Can you still run say grisoft AVG and be fairly virus safe?</p>
<p>I couldnt care less if norton doesnt like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 13:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>From the article:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Customers testing the newly released Windows XP Professional x64 Edition have been getting startling error messages that anti-virus protection from at least two vendorsâSymantec and McAfeeâis not yet available.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to early adopters looking to exploit the power of the latest 64-bit operating system, the Norton Internet Security 2005 error message is rather blunt: &quot;Symantec currently does not sell any consumer products that are certified to be compatible with 64-bit processors and operating systems.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> Customers testing the newly released Windows XP Professional x64 Edition have been getting startling error messages that anti-virus protection from at least two vendorsâSymantec and McAfeeâis not yet available.</p>
<p>According to early adopters looking to exploit the power of the latest 64-bit operating system, the Norton Internet Security 2005 error message is rather blunt: &#8220;Symantec currently does not sell any consumer products that are certified to be compatible with 64-bit processors and operating systems.&#8221; </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norgus</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14917</link>
		<dc:creator>Norgus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 11:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14917</guid>
		<description>I havnt read much of the article, but don&#039;t any of the 32bit antivirus programs run under xp64, just as regular 32 bit applications should?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I havnt read much of the article, but don&#8217;t any of the 32bit antivirus programs run under xp64, just as regular 32 bit applications should?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyWH</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14916</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyWH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 10:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14916</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a matter of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/05/windows_x64_lacks_major_anti_virus_coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-14915</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 07:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1586#comment-14915</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why everybody is making a big deal about this.  I suspect that most 64bit adopters are the types that run anti-virus software (gamers and engineers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why everybody is making a big deal about this.  I suspect that most 64bit adopters are the types that run anti-virus software (gamers and engineers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
