<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Hawking Halo Script for $10M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/comment-page-1/#comment-16903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1792#comment-16903</guid>
		<description>heh how good was mario bros =)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh how good was mario bros =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHESSMASTER</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/comment-page-1/#comment-16902</link>
		<dc:creator>CHESSMASTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 04:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1792#comment-16902</guid>
		<description>Griffith is absolutely right. it is blatantly obvious that consumers are discovering that it would be a waste of money to get a xbox 360 for halo 3 and that microsoft is trying to prolong the release of longhorn as much as it can (I STILL REMEMBER WAITING LIKE A CHILD FOR THE &quot;2004&quot; RELEASE DATE. Anyways, the point is that this is a futile (FUTILE!!!) attempt to get people to buy halo 3 (and, thus, an xbox 360) 

PS3 wins, XBOX and NINTENDO fall (NINTENDO loses, MiCROSOFT has a bbillion other things so its rather unaffected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griffith is absolutely right. it is blatantly obvious that consumers are discovering that it would be a waste of money to get a xbox 360 for halo 3 and that microsoft is trying to prolong the release of longhorn as much as it can (I STILL REMEMBER WAITING LIKE A CHILD FOR THE &#8220;2004&#8243; RELEASE DATE. Anyways, the point is that this is a futile (FUTILE!!!) attempt to get people to buy halo 3 (and, thus, an xbox 360) </p>
<p>PS3 wins, XBOX and NINTENDO fall (NINTENDO loses, MiCROSOFT has a bbillion other things so its rather unaffected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotWind</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/comment-page-1/#comment-16901</link>
		<dc:creator>DotWind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1792#comment-16901</guid>
		<description>It will probably take off. Halo is the perfect game to change into a movie because it&#039;s more mainstream than other geek targeted games. But again depends what they make out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will probably take off. Halo is the perfect game to change into a movie because it&#8217;s more mainstream than other geek targeted games. But again depends what they make out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/comment-page-1/#comment-16900</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1792#comment-16900</guid>
		<description>Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Resident Evil, Mortal Kombat is a less biased list considering the monies these films have taken in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Resident Evil, Mortal Kombat is a less biased list considering the monies these films have taken in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/06/microsoft_hawking_halo_script_for_10m/comment-page-1/#comment-16899</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1792#comment-16899</guid>
		<description>You forgot Tomb Raider. One aspect I don&#039;t like about Halo is that it isn&#039;t &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; big of a deal, at least not where I live. My guess is that in America it has probably reached a Lara Croft height that I&#039;m unaware of, but from my point of view it seems like Microsoft is trying to buy Halo&#039;s popularity trying to make it sound and look better and bigger than it really is.

I think Halo has reached it&#039;s popularity peak. If you go to Gamespot&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamespot.com/poll/archive.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;poll archive&lt;/a&gt;  and look at the XBox 360 and Halo 3 polls you&#039;ll notice that 45% of the people that voted don&#039;t care or aren&#039;t getting the XBox 360Âº and 39% of the people that voted on the Halo 3 poll aren&#039;t buying (or don&#039;t plan to) because they were disappointed with it&#039;s ending. 

So let&#039;s do some maths ... according to my calculations (if I did something wrong feel free to fix my numbers) at the very maximum 33.55% (55 - 39% of it) of gamers will buy Halo 3. But I think this percentage is very exagerated because on the XBox 360Âº many (37%) voted that they would wait for all the &quot;hullabaloo* to die&quot; before buying it, and if the console proves to be disappointing compared to the PS3 than that share of gamers won&#039;t be getting either the console or the game.

So at the moment Microsoft&#039;s strategy seems to be: Chunk out buckets of publicity (Mtv, Halo movie) and get all the attention they can away from Longhorn.

Sony&#039;s strategy seems to be: Wow the crowd.

Which one is better? Well, in the long term, if what Sony showed at E3 proves to be real then I think that the PS3 will win this console&#039;s round. If Nintendo decides to give more maturity to their titles  (unlikely) they could probably make Microsoft&#039;s knees tremble a bit and perhaps even take second place, at least that&#039;s what I speculate.

* Don&#039;t ask me what hullabaloo is, I have no idea either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot Tomb Raider. One aspect I don&#8217;t like about Halo is that it isn&#8217;t <b>that</b> big of a deal, at least not where I live. My guess is that in America it has probably reached a Lara Croft height that I&#8217;m unaware of, but from my point of view it seems like Microsoft is trying to buy Halo&#8217;s popularity trying to make it sound and look better and bigger than it really is.</p>
<p>I think Halo has reached it&#8217;s popularity peak. If you go to Gamespot&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/poll/archive.html" rel="nofollow">poll archive</a>  and look at the XBox 360 and Halo 3 polls you&#8217;ll notice that 45% of the people that voted don&#8217;t care or aren&#8217;t getting the XBox 360Âº and 39% of the people that voted on the Halo 3 poll aren&#8217;t buying (or don&#8217;t plan to) because they were disappointed with it&#8217;s ending. </p>
<p>So let&#8217;s do some maths &#8230; according to my calculations (if I did something wrong feel free to fix my numbers) at the very maximum 33.55% (55 &#8211; 39% of it) of gamers will buy Halo 3. But I think this percentage is very exagerated because on the XBox 360Âº many (37%) voted that they would wait for all the &#8220;hullabaloo* to die&#8221; before buying it, and if the console proves to be disappointing compared to the PS3 than that share of gamers won&#8217;t be getting either the console or the game.</p>
<p>So at the moment Microsoft&#8217;s strategy seems to be: Chunk out buckets of publicity (Mtv, Halo movie) and get all the attention they can away from Longhorn.</p>
<p>Sony&#8217;s strategy seems to be: Wow the crowd.</p>
<p>Which one is better? Well, in the long term, if what Sony showed at E3 proves to be real then I think that the PS3 will win this console&#8217;s round. If Nintendo decides to give more maturity to their titles  (unlikely) they could probably make Microsoft&#8217;s knees tremble a bit and perhaps even take second place, at least that&#8217;s what I speculate.</p>
<p>* Don&#8217;t ask me what hullabaloo is, I have no idea either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
