Comments on: Comments are working http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/ Nerds are for Dorks Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 济南二手房 http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23355 济南二手房 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:42:33 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23355 既然来了，济南二手房（esf.jnol.cn）就冒个泡吧，呵呵，博主博客不错，加油，多多交流哈！ 既然来了，济南二手房（esf.jnol.cn）就冒个泡吧，呵呵，博主博客不错，加油，多多交流哈！

]]> By: XeroCool http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23354 XeroCool Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:58:47 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23354 Testing.. Testing..

]]> By: Griffith http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23353 Griffith Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:31:44 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23353 test test

]]> By: cliche http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23352 cliche Thu, 14 Jul 2005 01:01:40 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23352 Sorry for posting again, but I just noticed that <a href="http://isnoop.net/gmail/" rel="nofollow">isnoop.net</a> was taken down due to the notice from Google. This brings up a series of questions: 1. Isn't exposure a good thing? Or rather, what's worse than the bad publicity from shutting down a site? 2. Could it be that they're barely able to support the promised gig per account for even just the beta testers they have now? 3. If #2 is true, why would they increase the storage to 2gigs? 4. #3 suggests they have enough space, but they're expanding the storage per account very very very slowly. If they had the capacity, why wouldn't they go 'BAAAM! 2gigs!' Emeril style? Suspense marketing? 5. Why would giving away accounts matter if they're going live soon? Or are they planning to stay in beta for a long while? Damn conspiracy theorist in me just wouldn't stop! Sorry for posting again, but I just noticed that isnoop.net was taken down due to the notice from Google. This brings up a series of questions:
1. Isn’t exposure a good thing? Or rather, what’s worse than the bad publicity from shutting down a site?
2. Could it be that they’re barely able to support the promised gig per account for even just the beta testers they have now?
3. If #2 is true, why would they increase the storage to 2gigs?
4. #3 suggests they have enough space, but they’re expanding the storage per account very very very slowly. If they had the capacity, why wouldn’t they go ‘BAAAM! 2gigs!’ Emeril style? Suspense marketing?
5. Why would giving away accounts matter if they’re going live soon? Or are they planning to stay in beta for a long while?

Damn conspiracy theorist in me just wouldn’t stop!

]]> By: cliche http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23351 cliche Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:41:40 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23351 If this was gmail, #2 would have been filtered. If this was gmail, #2 would have been filtered.

]]> By: Griffith http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23350 Griffith Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:50:51 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23350 At least he isn't inviting us to go to a c@sino. At least he isn’t inviting us to go to a c@sino.

]]> By: JC http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23349 JC Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:40:09 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23349 on the other hand, maybe having comments off was a good thing, as muhammed showed above. on the other hand, maybe having comments off was a good thing, as muhammed showed above.

]]> By: muhammed http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23348 muhammed Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:33:19 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23348 please gmail invite please gmail invite

]]> By: Nicole http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/07/comments_are_working/#comment-23347 Nicole Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:10:39 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=1886#comment-23347 Ah...That would explain why it seemed so quiet around here as of late. Ah…That would explain why it seemed so quiet around here as of late.

]]>