<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macromedia Announces Studio 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/08/macromedia_announces_studio_8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/08/macromedia_announces_studio_8/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim G</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/08/macromedia_announces_studio_8/#comment-12400</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1975#comment-12400</guid>
		<description>I think it was already pretty obvious that Freehand was on its way out (it didn&#039;t get a new version for MX 2004). I suspect that what Macromedia has done is produce a package that is more coherently a web dev package. (Then there&#039;s always the question of whether Fireworks has beefed up its vector capabilities.)

Personally, I like the look of the new package components. I almost never used Freehand, since I don&#039;t do print design. Flashpaper looks handy, since I don&#039;t plan on upgrading my Acrobat, which is a few years old.

Contribute - well, I think that was a smart move on their part. It will probably gain them a lot of sales (though not from me - I&#039;m much more likely to go with a CMS).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was already pretty obvious that Freehand was on its way out (it didn&#8217;t get a new version for MX 2004). I suspect that what Macromedia has done is produce a package that is more coherently a web dev package. (Then there&#8217;s always the question of whether Fireworks has beefed up its vector capabilities.)</p>
<p>Personally, I like the look of the new package components. I almost never used Freehand, since I don&#8217;t do print design. Flashpaper looks handy, since I don&#8217;t plan on upgrading my Acrobat, which is a few years old.</p>
<p>Contribute &#8211; well, I think that was a smart move on their part. It will probably gain them a lot of sales (though not from me &#8211; I&#8217;m much more likely to go with a CMS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/08/macromedia_announces_studio_8/#comment-12399</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=1975#comment-12399</guid>
		<description>&quot;The one product that seems to be missing is Freehand, which has led some to speculate that the Adobe merger may have killed off the vector editing software.&quot;

That would be fine if Adobe Illustrator is included in this package, which it&#039;s not.  So to create something with Flash, you could have used Freehand for your vector graphics, but now you gotta go out and buy the Illustrator for $500?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The one product that seems to be missing is Freehand, which has led some to speculate that the Adobe merger may have killed off the vector editing software.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be fine if Adobe Illustrator is included in this package, which it&#8217;s not.  So to create something with Flash, you could have used Freehand for your vector graphics, but now you gotta go out and buy the Illustrator for $500?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

