Comments on: Intel to Dump Numbering Scheme and Start a New One http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/intel_to_dump_numbering_scheme_and_start_a_new_one/ Nerds are for Dorks Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Serious Career http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/intel_to_dump_numbering_scheme_and_start_a_new_one/comment-page-1/#comment-19912 Serious Career Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:06:52 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2142#comment-19912 shorter names, and unique, strange ones. shorter names, and unique, strange ones.

]]> By: Conglacio http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/intel_to_dump_numbering_scheme_and_start_a_new_one/comment-page-1/#comment-19911 Conglacio Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:53:26 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2142#comment-19911 they should go back to the 80x86 scheme they should go back to the 80×86 scheme

]]> By: Griffith http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/intel_to_dump_numbering_scheme_and_start_a_new_one/comment-page-1/#comment-19910 Griffith Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:53:29 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2142#comment-19910 Because shorter names for products sell better. Look at Nokia's phones for example, Before the 6*** used to be the best series and then there were de 9*** communicator series and all below those two were the cheap to medium consumer market. Now they're all mixed together, although still with 4 numbers. But they make little or no sense. Because shorter names for products sell better.

Look at Nokia’s phones for example, Before the 6*** used to be the best series and then there were de 9*** communicator series and all below those two were the cheap to medium consumer market.

Now they’re all mixed together, although still with 4 numbers. But they make little or no sense.

]]>