<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird 1.0.7 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/thunderbird_107_released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/thunderbird_107_released/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deivizu</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/thunderbird_107_released/comment-page-1/#comment-20768</link>
		<dc:creator>Deivizu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2167#comment-20768</guid>
		<description>I support Thunderbird, but I still can&#039;t tear myself away from Pegasus Mail, even after trying Thunderbird two times. I&#039;m keeping an eye on it, though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support Thunderbird, but I still can&#8217;t tear myself away from Pegasus Mail, even after trying Thunderbird two times. I&#8217;m keeping an eye on it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/09/thunderbird_107_released/comment-page-1/#comment-20767</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2167#comment-20767</guid>
		<description>1.1 Alpha? Ha, I have a 1.5 copy that&#039;s already in Beta status! So... to plot this out on a timeline:

1.5 Beta 1 released
1.0.7 released
1.1 Alpha 2 released

Thank you OSS versioning schemes for keeping everyone 100% sure they aren&#039;t running out of date software with security flaws in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.1 Alpha? Ha, I have a 1.5 copy that&#8217;s already in Beta status! So&#8230; to plot this out on a timeline:</p>
<p>1.5 Beta 1 released<br />
1.0.7 released<br />
1.1 Alpha 2 released</p>
<p>Thank you OSS versioning schemes for keeping everyone 100% sure they aren&#8217;t running out of date software with security flaws in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
