Comments on: 802.11n to Have Speeds as High as 600 mbps http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/80211n_to_have_speeds_as_high_as_600_mbps/ Nerds are for Dorks Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Automated Blog Posting http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/80211n_to_have_speeds_as_high_as_600_mbps/#comment-1309 Automated Blog Posting Sat, 06 Jan 2007 02:16:14 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2216#comment-1309 This is great! This is great!

]]> By: AutoBlog http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/80211n_to_have_speeds_as_high_as_600_mbps/#comment-1308 AutoBlog Tue, 26 Dec 2006 01:58:41 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2216#comment-1308 This is a great Blog! This is a great Blog!

]]> By: Alex Tan http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/80211n_to_have_speeds_as_high_as_600_mbps/#comment-1307 Alex Tan Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:05:40 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2216#comment-1307 ok ok

]]> By: cliche http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/80211n_to_have_speeds_as_high_as_600_mbps/#comment-1306 cliche Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:08:45 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2216#comment-1306 Again AlexTan, the image posted is misleading. That's not a 802.11n router, as the standard itself wouldn't be finalized until 2007. Given, that's a pre-N router supporting MIMO--it's still not the same thing as 802.11n. If there isn't a good image to use, it's okay to not use an image--especially if the product in question is not even out yet. Again AlexTan, the image posted is misleading. That’s not a 802.11n router, as the standard itself wouldn’t be finalized until 2007. Given, that’s a pre-N router supporting MIMO–it’s still not the same thing as 802.11n.

If there isn’t a good image to use, it’s okay to not use an image–especially if the product in question is not even out yet.

]]>