Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, says that it will take them 300 years to index the world’s information. Google has indexed 170 terabytes of data, and they estimate that there is a total of 5 million terabytes of information in the world. So Google has been around for 7 years, and they’ve done 0.000034% of the work meaning that the other 99.999966% will be done over the next 293 years? They obviously have a lot of faith in technology.

Sorry for getting the facts wrong before.
New Data Backup World Record
Google Buys 5% of AOL
Google Launching MyGoogle Portal
Some Interesting Google Facts
Has Google Reached Its Limits?
Forever Geek is a resource for all things geek. You can stay tuned by having the latest FG news delivered to you for free via RSS.
Category: Uncategorized
Tags:

Netbooks and User Satisfaction: It’s All About Expectations
10 Cool Sony Walkman photos – celebrate Walkman’s 30th birthday
7 Responses for "Google – It will take 300 years to index world’s data"
October 9th, 2005 at 12:25 am
1Its says:
“Of the approximately 5 million terabytes of information out in the world, only about 170 terabytes have been indexed, he said earlier during his speech”
5 Million, not 5000..
October 9th, 2005 at 12:26 am
2Sorry, not 500 that should be.
October 9th, 2005 at 12:39 am
3This time you have gone too far.. :) You said 500 million, whereas their estimate is only 5 million…
October 9th, 2005 at 1:01 am
4You’re fucking up! haha! That’s okay, it’s a saturday night, we’re all wasted.
October 9th, 2005 at 8:11 am
5Actually, the reason it will take so long is that most of the world’s knowledge is stored in people’s brains – which means hunting down every last man, woman and child and extracting their brains.
October 9th, 2005 at 11:59 am
65 million existing terabytes. They’ll also have to index all the new stuff that’s being created as they index.
October 10th, 2005 at 2:49 am
7170 out of 5 million terabytes is 0.0034%, not 0.000034%.
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply