<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPods No Longer Support Firewire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21243</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21243</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Firewire is pretty much as good as dead.  As smart as Steve Jobs is, it was definately a mistake when he decided to charge a buck per port *before* it became standardized on pcs.  If there was no charge, it&#039;s pretty clear that it would&#039;ve came out on top, as it was far and away superior to USB of that era and had the backing of Apple, Sony, and most importantly, Intel.  Charging for it pissed Intel off, who then decided to develope an imporved USB2.0.  Firewire is still superior to USB2.0, but only marginally so now--and superior technology alone doesn&#039;t win the marketplace.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Firewire is pretty much as good as dead.  As smart as Steve Jobs is, it was definately a mistake when he decided to charge a buck per port *before* it became standardized on pcs.  If there was no charge, it&#8217;s pretty clear that it would&#8217;ve came out on top, as it was far and away superior to USB of that era and had the backing of Apple, Sony, and most importantly, Intel.  Charging for it pissed Intel off, who then decided to develope an imporved USB2.0.  Firewire is still superior to USB2.0, but only marginally so now&#8211;and superior technology alone doesn&#8217;t win the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21242</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21242</guid>
		<description>I agree that new versions of any product should a step up and not down, but I think firewire is a dying plug so, for me at least, it&#039;s understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that new versions of any product should a step up and not down, but I think firewire is a dying plug so, for me at least, it&#8217;s understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21241</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21241</guid>
		<description>cliche, I did photoshop it I thought that was clear, and jeremey thanks for the advice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cliche, I did photoshop it I thought that was clear, and jeremey thanks for the advice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21240</guid>
		<description>Hey AlexTan, make sure you select a category when you post. It throws off the pages if there is no category set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey AlexTan, make sure you select a category when you post. It throws off the pages if there is no category set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>AlexTan,

Please tell us where you got this image.  The &#039;No Firewire Support&#039; line is obviously photoshopped in.  Folling the link to the Apple site, there is the same image without the last line of &#039;No Firewire Support&#039;.

Please send a link supporting the article, else, the readers may think that you made it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AlexTan,</p>
<p>Please tell us where you got this image.  The &#8216;No Firewire Support&#8217; line is obviously photoshopped in.  Folling the link to the Apple site, there is the same image without the last line of &#8216;No Firewire Support&#8217;.</p>
<p>Please send a link supporting the article, else, the readers may think that you made it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>The beauty of Firewire to me isn&#039;t being able to get marginally faster speeds, but being able to use the firewire port on my powerbook instead of using one of the two precious USB ports.  I mean, if you have a mouse in one that only leaves one, which has to support all your other peripherals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beauty of Firewire to me isn&#8217;t being able to get marginally faster speeds, but being able to use the firewire port on my powerbook instead of using one of the two precious USB ports.  I mean, if you have a mouse in one that only leaves one, which has to support all your other peripherals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21237</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21237</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is much faster, other than that the iPod looks pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is much faster, other than that the iPod looks pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/ipods_no_longer_support_firewire/comment-page-1/#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2217#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>A &quot;step up&quot;?
Is Firewire so superior to USB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;step up&#8221;?<br />
Is Firewire so superior to USB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
