<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suit filed over Nano scratches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/suit_filed_over_nano_scratches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/suit_filed_over_nano_scratches/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/suit_filed_over_nano_scratches/comment-page-1/#comment-21741</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2254#comment-21741</guid>
		<description>&quot;People who purchase something (other than actual artwork, and maybe cars) because it looks pretty are the root problem here.&quot;

Bullshit.  Form and function are not exclusive or.  They complement eachother.  You may be happy with your k-mart clothes because they&#039;re just as functional as designer clothes.  You may be happy with your wall-mart furniture because they&#039;re just as functional as more expensive furniture.  But some of us care about aesthetics as well as function.

So please, spare me the snobby &quot;I care absolutely nothing about it&#039;s looks&quot; bullshit.  People outside of your k-mart circle appreciate beauty.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People who purchase something (other than actual artwork, and maybe cars) because it looks pretty are the root problem here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bullshit.  Form and function are not exclusive or.  They complement eachother.  You may be happy with your k-mart clothes because they&#8217;re just as functional as designer clothes.  You may be happy with your wall-mart furniture because they&#8217;re just as functional as more expensive furniture.  But some of us care about aesthetics as well as function.</p>
<p>So please, spare me the snobby &#8220;I care absolutely nothing about it&#8217;s looks&#8221; bullshit.  People outside of your k-mart circle appreciate beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/suit_filed_over_nano_scratches/comment-page-1/#comment-21740</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2254#comment-21740</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with cliche and everyone else also. I really like my PSP but in terms of dusts, scratches and fingerprints it&#039;s completely awfull. I had to buy a screen protector and I have to carry it around inside it&#039;s little bag all the time. On the first day I got a small &quot;dot&quot; dent near the D-Pad and I didn&#039;t do anything special and it was inside it&#039;s bag.

My Sony Laptop on the other hand has wonderfull material, the case is very hard and so far there has been no scratches whatsoever on it and I handle it the same way I do my PSP, perhaps even with a little less care (Since my PSP has &quot;two&quot; protections, it&#039;s sleeve bag and the laptop bag itself).

I saw an Apple Powerbook, and it&#039;s surface was all scratched, it looked horrible, like it had been rubbed against a wall or something. I don&#039;t think it only happens to an iPod.

Companies should choose hard and durable materials for their gadjets, specially those that you carry in your pockets. I hate Nokia&#039;s cases, the case can survive a World War but the screen get&#039;s scratched like I meant to do it or even breaks sometimes.

I&#039;ve had 2 Nokia phones and around 8 &quot;skins&quot; in total, not to mention the various bags and covers I&#039;ve tried for them. I like a gadjet that I can pick up and use quickly, not unwrap it like it was a mummy to finally see it&#039;s shiny plate and start using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with cliche and everyone else also. I really like my PSP but in terms of dusts, scratches and fingerprints it&#8217;s completely awfull. I had to buy a screen protector and I have to carry it around inside it&#8217;s little bag all the time. On the first day I got a small &#8220;dot&#8221; dent near the D-Pad and I didn&#8217;t do anything special and it was inside it&#8217;s bag.</p>
<p>My Sony Laptop on the other hand has wonderfull material, the case is very hard and so far there has been no scratches whatsoever on it and I handle it the same way I do my PSP, perhaps even with a little less care (Since my PSP has &#8220;two&#8221; protections, it&#8217;s sleeve bag and the laptop bag itself).</p>
<p>I saw an Apple Powerbook, and it&#8217;s surface was all scratched, it looked horrible, like it had been rubbed against a wall or something. I don&#8217;t think it only happens to an iPod.</p>
<p>Companies should choose hard and durable materials for their gadjets, specially those that you carry in your pockets. I hate Nokia&#8217;s cases, the case can survive a World War but the screen get&#8217;s scratched like I meant to do it or even breaks sometimes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had 2 Nokia phones and around 8 &#8220;skins&#8221; in total, not to mention the various bags and covers I&#8217;ve tried for them. I like a gadjet that I can pick up and use quickly, not unwrap it like it was a mummy to finally see it&#8217;s shiny plate and start using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/10/suit_filed_over_nano_scratches/comment-page-1/#comment-21739</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2254#comment-21739</guid>
		<description>I know someone is about to say, &#039;they should have bought a cover or sleeve&#039;!!!  But I recently started wondering: What&#039;s the point of buying a product so damn beautiful--when you have to cover up all the time?  What&#039;s the point of buying a product so amazingly slim--when it doubles in width with a mandatory sleeve?  And we all know that an ipod naked for a couple of months is as visually attractive as goatse.

And i&#039;m really not trying to flaimbait (I&#039;ve owned 3 ipods).  It&#039;s just an honest thought I had recently when considering the nano.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know someone is about to say, &#8216;they should have bought a cover or sleeve&#8217;!!!  But I recently started wondering: What&#8217;s the point of buying a product so damn beautiful&#8211;when you have to cover up all the time?  What&#8217;s the point of buying a product so amazingly slim&#8211;when it doubles in width with a mandatory sleeve?  And we all know that an ipod naked for a couple of months is as visually attractive as goatse.</p>
<p>And i&#8217;m really not trying to flaimbait (I&#8217;ve owned 3 ipods).  It&#8217;s just an honest thought I had recently when considering the nano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
