<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating Gradient Images without Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:15:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darkflame</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22807</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22807</guid>
		<description>Anything that avoids massive background pictures is good, imo
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that avoids massive background pictures is good, imo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: umabdullah</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22806</link>
		<dc:creator>umabdullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22806</guid>
		<description>Great! goodluck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! goodluck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22805</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22805</guid>
		<description>Something I was playing around with the other week:
http://slayeroffice.com/code/gradient/

Cross-browser, no images. Just define the gradient colors as part of the class attribute. Could probably do with some refining, and requires the element to be positioned for it to work, but its pretty quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I was playing around with the other week:<br />
<a href="http://slayeroffice.com/code/gradient/" rel="nofollow">http://slayeroffice.com/code/gradient/</a></p>
<p>Cross-browser, no images. Just define the gradient colors as part of the class attribute. Could probably do with some refining, and requires the element to be positioned for it to work, but its pretty quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22804</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22804</guid>
		<description>For background gradients, it&#039;s common practice to get a 1px wide (or tall) sample and
background-repeat: repeat-x (or y)
to reduce bloat.  For patterns like the one on the title bar here, &lt;a href=&quot;http://forevergeek.com/images/title_bg.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a small block of sample is taken and repeated.&lt;/a&gt;  This would be a more useful tool if it gave you the sample instead of the whole image.

(I haven&#039;t made a web page in years, but I think they still do it like this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For background gradients, it&#8217;s common practice to get a 1px wide (or tall) sample and<br />
background-repeat: repeat-x (or y)<br />
to reduce bloat.  For patterns like the one on the title bar here, <a href="http://forevergeek.com/images/title_bg.gif" rel="nofollow">a small block of sample is taken and repeated.</a>  This would be a more useful tool if it gave you the sample instead of the whole image.</p>
<p>(I haven&#8217;t made a web page in years, but I think they still do it like this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22803</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22803</guid>
		<description>Kent, do we really need to analyze every word here? kameowy, thanks for the tip, and riddle I dont think photoshop is evil ok, it&#039;s a powerful tool. Personally, I prefer sticking to coding as much as possible. That&#039;s all I was saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent, do we really need to analyze every word here? kameowy, thanks for the tip, and riddle I dont think photoshop is evil ok, it&#8217;s a powerful tool. Personally, I prefer sticking to coding as much as possible. That&#8217;s all I was saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riddle</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22802</link>
		<dc:creator>Riddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22802</guid>
		<description>@Alex: I don&#039;t see the point in not-using-the-evil-photoshop. I&#039;m webdevloper also and I can&#039;t stand webdesigning without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex: I don&#8217;t see the point in not-using-the-evil-photoshop. I&#8217;m webdevloper also and I can&#8217;t stand webdesigning without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kameowy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22801</link>
		<dc:creator>kameowy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22801</guid>
		<description>u should try -moz-border-colors... work only @mozilla products but looks nice (if u need gradient at border;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u should try -moz-border-colors&#8230; work only @mozilla products but looks nice (if u need gradient at border;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/creating_gradient_images_without_photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-22800</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2387#comment-22800</guid>
		<description>So, when is an app not an app?

Is a web app not an app?

It would take you 10 minutes to learn most of what can be done with the Photoshop gradient tools, and that would give you about 100x the power of this web app, as good as it is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when is an app not an app?</p>
<p>Is a web app not an app?</p>
<p>It would take you 10 minutes to learn most of what can be done with the Photoshop gradient tools, and that would give you about 100x the power of this web app, as good as it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
