http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/ Nerds are for Dorks Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/comment-page-1/#comment-22066 Danielle Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:48:48 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2353#comment-22066 Well, it's probably just an attempt to stem the class action lawsuits against them. I don't think current i-pod nano owners recieve them, though. Well, it’s probably just an attempt to stem the class action lawsuits against them. I don’t think current i-pod nano owners recieve them, though.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/comment-page-1/#comment-22065 Griffith Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:30:19 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2353#comment-22065 They should have a black cover, but hey, at least it beats having a scratched Nano. If they had this from the start I could have bought one, perhaps in a year or so. They should have a black cover, but hey, at least it beats having a scratched Nano. If they had this from the start I could have bought one, perhaps in a year or so.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/comment-page-1/#comment-22064 Meka Sat, 12 Nov 2005 06:27:37 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2353#comment-22064 At least they decided to try.. At least they decided to try..

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/comment-page-1/#comment-22063 cliche Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:21:01 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2353#comment-22063 Oh? I think it looks clean. Oh? I think it looks clean.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/ipod_nanos_now_ship_w_protective_case/comment-page-1/#comment-22062 Keith D Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:08:26 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2353#comment-22062 Holy shiat that's tacky. Holy shiat that’s tacky.

]]>