http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/sony_dsc_n1/ Nerds are for Dorks Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/sony_dsc_n1/#comment-28812 Griffith Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:52:02 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2312#comment-28812 I don't mean to go against your opinion but this camera actually has an image stabilizer of some sort. I don’t mean to go against your opinion but this camera actually has an image stabilizer of some sort.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/sony_dsc_n1/#comment-28811 Mike Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:50:38 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2312#comment-28811 Sony Baloney is increasing MP like crazy without understanding the main reason of a camera. A picture says a thousand words unless its blurry, oversaturated, or just flat. I’m not saying sony cameras are bad, but this one just has less than I’d expect. No optical viewthrough, zero manual controls = zero chance I will ever look at it again. How about some image stabilization? Sony Baloney is increasing MP like crazy without understanding the main reason of a camera. A picture says a thousand words unless its blurry, oversaturated, or just flat. I’m not saying sony cameras are bad, but this one just has less than I’d expect. No optical viewthrough, zero manual controls = zero chance I will ever look at it again. How about some image stabilization?

]]>