<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista Beta 2 Delayed Until 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12945</guid>
		<description>Actually, most of us do not mind a good Microsoft bash provided that you provide some line of reasoning behind the bash.  All of us should be able to criticize software or software vendors as long as we can say something intelligent in the process.  The problem in this thread is that I see no intelligence behind the Microsoft bashing.  How about saying something smart in order to make a point guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, most of us do not mind a good Microsoft bash provided that you provide some line of reasoning behind the bash.  All of us should be able to criticize software or software vendors as long as we can say something intelligent in the process.  The problem in this thread is that I see no intelligence behind the Microsoft bashing.  How about saying something smart in order to make a point guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: culejoe</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12944</link>
		<dc:creator>culejoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12944</guid>
		<description>People have to complain about something they cant just keep there mouth shut... to hard for them.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have to complain about something they cant just keep there mouth shut&#8230; to hard for them&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erixer</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12943</link>
		<dc:creator>erixer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12943</guid>
		<description>I agree with cliche, gosh no more Microsoft bashing for crying out loud...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with cliche, gosh no more Microsoft bashing for crying out loud&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12942</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12942</guid>
		<description>The delay really isn&#039;t a problem for MS as long as there&#039;s nothing else out there better than WinXP(for the average Joe).  What they should be worrying about is the absence of reasons for the upgrade.  Unless I see something significant in beta 2, I for one will stick to XP.

Before this post starts a flame:
osX = different platform = doesn&#039;t count
*nix/*bsd = still too rough for average Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The delay really isn&#8217;t a problem for MS as long as there&#8217;s nothing else out there better than WinXP(for the average Joe).  What they should be worrying about is the absence of reasons for the upgrade.  Unless I see something significant in beta 2, I for one will stick to XP.</p>
<p>Before this post starts a flame:<br />
osX = different platform = doesn&#8217;t count<br />
*nix/*bsd = still too rough for average Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12941</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12941</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that usually the people that I hear talking about Microsoft the worst are usually the first to get the newest versions of their OSs and brag about it.

A few months later that brag turns into hate, and from then onwards Microsoft &quot;sucks&quot; once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that usually the people that I hear talking about Microsoft the worst are usually the first to get the newest versions of their OSs and brag about it.</p>
<p>A few months later that brag turns into hate, and from then onwards Microsoft &#8220;sucks&#8221; once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J44xm</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12940</link>
		<dc:creator>J44xm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12940</guid>
		<description>I would be happy if it were delayed indefinitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be happy if it were delayed indefinitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanenas.net</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12939</link>
		<dc:creator>kanenas.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12939</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot Micro-Bill-Soft... In a few hours I will switch to Ubuntu Linux. I have test it in an old machine and works fine ! So... Bye, bye Bill !!!

&lt;a&gt;kanenas.net&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Micro-Bill-Soft&#8230; In a few hours I will switch to Ubuntu Linux. I have test it in an old machine and works fine ! So&#8230; Bye, bye Bill !!!</p>
<p><a>kanenas.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AkaXakA</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12938</link>
		<dc:creator>AkaXakA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12938</guid>
		<description>Ha! Probably won&#039;t be a proper version out before 2007 then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Probably won&#8217;t be a proper version out before 2007 then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schatten</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>Schatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>heh. oops. put an extra &quot;than expected&quot; on there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh. oops. put an extra &#8220;than expected&#8221; on there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schatten</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/11/windows_vista_beta_2_delayed_until_2006/#comment-12936</link>
		<dc:creator>Schatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2357#comment-12936</guid>
		<description>Apparently it&#039;s taking longer than expected to reverse-engineer Mac OS 10.4 than expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently it&#8217;s taking longer than expected to reverse-engineer Mac OS 10.4 than expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

