<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Coaxes Google to Try Busier Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/aol_coaxes_google_to_try_busier_ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/aol_coaxes_google_to_try_busier_ads/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/aol_coaxes_google_to_try_busier_ads/comment-page-1/#comment-23592</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2493#comment-23592</guid>
		<description>It sounds really bad, but I&#039;ll have to see it first before making judgements.  If you think about it, you load graphics every time you use google anyway: Google logo is graphic as well, though it&#039;s very well optimized for the size (8k).  If they keep it under 10k without animation, there wouldn&#039;t be much difference at all even for people using 56k.

Besides which, it&#039;s all rumors at this point.  Since when did &quot;executives close to the talks&quot; hold any credibility?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds really bad, but I&#8217;ll have to see it first before making judgements.  If you think about it, you load graphics every time you use google anyway: Google logo is graphic as well, though it&#8217;s very well optimized for the size (8k).  If they keep it under 10k without animation, there wouldn&#8217;t be much difference at all even for people using 56k.</p>
<p>Besides which, it&#8217;s all rumors at this point.  Since when did &#8220;executives close to the talks&#8221; hold any credibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sven</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/aol_coaxes_google_to_try_busier_ads/comment-page-1/#comment-23591</link>
		<dc:creator>sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2493#comment-23591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll trade you my 100 for your 100 :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll trade you my 100 for your 100 :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/aol_coaxes_google_to_try_busier_ads/comment-page-1/#comment-23590</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2493#comment-23590</guid>
		<description>the end of the Age of Google is quickly approaching.  First a part stake in AOL of all un-godly things, and now graphical adds would seal it&#039;s fate.  The beauty of Google is how fast it runs, and this is in large part due to the abscence of slow-loading graphics on it&#039;s search and email pages.  

Say it ain&#039;t so.

anyone want 100 gmail invites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the end of the Age of Google is quickly approaching.  First a part stake in AOL of all un-godly things, and now graphical adds would seal it&#8217;s fate.  The beauty of Google is how fast it runs, and this is in large part due to the abscence of slow-loading graphics on it&#8217;s search and email pages.  </p>
<p>Say it ain&#8217;t so.</p>
<p>anyone want 100 gmail invites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
