<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buh-bye &quot;Intel Inside&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2512#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Those stickers really go down well with some hot sauce!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those stickers really go down well with some hot sauce!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doughnut</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>doughnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2512#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>&quot;But I&#039;ll eat one of those ugly foil labels if it shows up on a Mac proper&quot;

Or just cover it up the Intel logo with the included Apple stickers. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But I&#8217;ll eat one of those ugly foil labels if it shows up on a Mac proper&#8221;</p>
<p>Or just cover it up the Intel logo with the included Apple stickers. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2512#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet that there won&#039;t be any stickers on any Apple product period. Apple&#039;s all about clean design lines and those stickers on PCs (and digital cameras and camcorders, etc.) are ugly.

It&#039;ll be somewhere on the packaging.

But I&#039;ll eat one of those ugly foil labels if it shows up on a Mac proper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet that there won&#8217;t be any stickers on any Apple product period. Apple&#8217;s all about clean design lines and those stickers on PCs (and digital cameras and camcorders, etc.) are ugly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be somewhere on the packaging.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll eat one of those ugly foil labels if it shows up on a Mac proper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James AkaXakA</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>James AkaXakA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2512#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>New logo&#039;s are teh suck too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New logo&#8217;s are teh suck too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/buh_bye_intel_inside/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>James Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2512#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>The real reason AMD is chipping away at their market is because it is by far a better chip.  There are very few exceptions.  Being a web designer, utilizing graphics primarily AMD performs better.  I also know a digital (video) content company and they too have heard that AMD is a better chip.  I do know that Boxx (www.boxxtech.com) only uses AMD for their systems.  Maybe Intel should look at their numbers again and get their chip into a better market position with either greater performance or better pricing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason AMD is chipping away at their market is because it is by far a better chip.  There are very few exceptions.  Being a web designer, utilizing graphics primarily AMD performs better.  I also know a digital (video) content company and they too have heard that AMD is a better chip.  I do know that Boxx (www.boxxtech.com) only uses AMD for their systems.  Maybe Intel should look at their numbers again and get their chip into a better market position with either greater performance or better pricing ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

