Comments on: Microsoft – The Only Ones Following Web Standards!

By: netsearchworld.com

netsearchworld.com — Mon, 25 May 2009 23:46:09 +0000

And who does not wish to pay for a hosting, is urgent here - the best free web hosting!

By: glamour girls

glamour girls — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:34:24 +0000

Space Exploration Benefits Our World, costs too much

By: hospedagem de sites

hospedagem de sites — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:45:57 +0000

Host your blog with us! Only $5 per mounth!

By: tom

tom — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:08:56 +0000

Hi cool site friends!

By: www.androhair.com

www.androhair.com — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:53:16 +0000

You have a nice site, our site is: http://www.androhair.com, The laser comb androhair, medical device that prevents hair loss

By: Gauge

Gauge — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 04:58:16 +0000

Gauge

By: amigo

amigo — Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:39:33 +0000

Hi cool site amigo12!

By: Katrina

Katrina — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:23:02 +0000

Hi! Very Good Site! Keep Doing That!
[url=][/url]

By: Saving Tax Tricks

Saving Tax Tricks — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:05:30 +0000

wowow good blog m8 !!! keep it up

By: hot wife

hot wife — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:05:06 +0000

hot wife

By: spanish fly

spanish fly — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:35:11 +0000

spanish fly

By: horny women

horny women — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:09:32 +0000

horny women

By: nude asian

nude asian — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:46:11 +0000

nude asian

By: big tit

big tit — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:09:11 +0000

See busty girls

By: SEO Hosting

SEO Hosting — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:47:00 +0000

I’m sure the findings would be similar if you looked at the internet on a smaller scale aswell.

By: diazepam

diazepam — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:59:41 +0000

Exelent! Good work! Please visit my site too: [url=][/url] Good luck! :)

By: prevacid

prevacid — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:42:16 +0000

You site looks great! Would you please also visit my site? [url=][/url] Good luck! :)

By: prevacid

prevacid — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:42:08 +0000

You site looks great! Would you please also visit my site? [url=][/url] Good luck! :)

By: prevacid

prevacid — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:42:03 +0000

You site looks great! Would you please also visit my site? [url=][/url] Good luck! :)

By: acyclovir

acyclovir — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:32:29 +0000

Hi there! Just couldn't resist your guestbook! Please also visit my site: [url=][/url] Good luck! :)

By: herbalmeds enlargement

herbalmeds enlargement — Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:22:25 +0000

great tasting helpme

By: njjk

njjk — Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:20:59 +0000

bn jnh

By: big tits

big tits — Sun, 07 May 2006 08:47:33 +0000

when the wind blows the cradle will rock.

By: Camera Shop

Camera Shop — Mon, 01 May 2006 15:53:30 +0000

good article. i like your site

By: Asbed

Asbed — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:44:18 +0000

I think the question of standards is solely based on the developer it may be set by a group of intelectuals but were the ones developing so we can get our way if we want to, i have many problems with microsoft websites considering the amount of tracking cookies and ads they omit. also XP doesnt come within an inch of the standards (yet i use it cmon you know every one does) the 3 main colours that you shouldnt use are yellow green and red, these are for the incluesive purpose of disabled people yet microsofts main colours fall in with those colours. I think i should stop talking now or else my comment will be as long as the post….. *Should i consider posting in the future* Yes Yes i should

CYA

By: Jaime L.

Jaime L. — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:23:51 +0000

HA! But Hotmail.com has 4 errors! hehe

By: Hmmm

Hmmm — Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:09:44 +0000

5/3-2006: http://www.msn.no outputs over 1000 errors

By: thisisthekaos

thisisthekaos — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:06:48 +0000

Sorry, but the GNU one validates for me

By: Ricardo

Ricardo — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:16:08 +0000

I don’t understand what you mean by “GNU – Complete Failure (encoding error).” cause I’ve done the validation test my self and got this anwser:
”
The document located at was checked and found to be valid XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question identified itself as “XHTML 1.0 Strict” and that we successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML or XML Parser (depending on the markup language used).”

By: Carlos Rodrigues

Carlos Rodrigues — Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:54:01 +0000

Yes, and microsoft.com/downloads spits out 70 errors, as microsoft.com/windows.

By: Bill Gates VII

Bill Gates VII — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0000

Microsoft follows standards… on their title page only!

windows.com – 19 errors (emty page with flash!)
msdn.com – 101(!) errors
msnbc.com – 225(!!!) erros

Better luck next time.

By: rch

rch — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:47:10 +0000

The number of errors that validator shows, is most frequently NOT the right number. After the first error a validator often CANNOT validate further properly.
In most cases, when validator reports of 50 or 100 errors, there are no more than a dozen real errors. After correcting them validator is satisfied.
The only way to get RIGHT number of errors looks like this: find the FIRST error, then correct it, then revalidate, find the new FIRST error, correct it, and so on.

By: Jeena Paradies

Jeena Paradies — Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:16:36 +0000

I had no problem to validate Slashdot and it had only 7 errors which where all caused by not masking & in the links, that’s not that bad.

By: Montgomery

Montgomery — Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:42:44 +0000

select iso-8859-1 as Character Encoding for GNU,…

By: Pinoxy

Pinoxy — Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:56:05 +0000

Check

http://sudhakar.wordpress.com/2005/12/28/google-fails-here-buddy/