<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SNL Parodies iPod&#8217;s Planned Obsolescence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/snl_parodies_ipods_planned_obsolescence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/snl_parodies_ipods_planned_obsolescence/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth J. Moyers</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/snl_parodies_ipods_planned_obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-23124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth J. Moyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2432#comment-23124</guid>
		<description>And you aren&#039;t &quot;revealing all&quot; because?
Mike, that has to be the most transparent scam I&#039;ve seen in at least a week. MS&#039;s behaviour is disgusting enough; we don&#039;t need you adding to it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you aren&#8217;t &#8220;revealing all&#8221; because?<br />
Mike, that has to be the most transparent scam I&#8217;ve seen in at least a week. MS&#8217;s behaviour is disgusting enough; we don&#8217;t need you adding to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2005/12/snl_parodies_ipods_planned_obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-23123</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2432#comment-23123</guid>
		<description>I actually found a way to get rid of planned obsolescence....built 
in errors. Keep in mind I have a windows 3.1 pc which is completely 
functional as a result of my highly unconventional &quot;fix&quot; or repair 
process. Now 20 years old and completely stable and reliable. 

This win3.1 pc used to break down about every 3-6 months....it was 
going thru the built in evolution of failures as revealed by 
this &quot;fix&quot;.

Nothing will make a consumer buy a new pc like the frustration of 
having a pc which locks up all the time with no service provider 
having the ability to figure out how to make it stop. 

                              OR
A dead laptop/pc which needs a $600 motherboard when you can buy a 
new one for $1000.

My unique process is the result of the need to find a fix for a non-
detectable virus/malicous code which caused multiple 
hardware/software failures. I have a running list of 50 common 
failures/symptoms resolved by this process....everything from 
locking up problems, to data overwritten by garbage, to dead 
motherboard, video board, NIC, to Disk I/O errors and general 
protection failures....even a mac pc with a &quot;damaged Hard drive&quot; 
according to the operating system while attempting to initialize it.

This process works in DOS/Win 3.x, Win 9x, Win2K, Win 2000 network 
server os, and mac. Hard to say what else it will work on.

Based on my experience, It will work in every os there is. You can 
see an ad I wrote in an attempt to sell this process at 
Houston.Craigslist computer service section.

This info is not known by even the most experienced service 
providers as I have repaired desktops, laptops...even printer&#039;s 
boards that were being thrown away by multiple service providers.

Have a great day,

Mike
PS this process is both time and cost effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually found a way to get rid of planned obsolescence&#8230;.built<br />
in errors. Keep in mind I have a windows 3.1 pc which is completely<br />
functional as a result of my highly unconventional &#8220;fix&#8221; or repair<br />
process. Now 20 years old and completely stable and reliable. </p>
<p>This win3.1 pc used to break down about every 3-6 months&#8230;.it was<br />
going thru the built in evolution of failures as revealed by<br />
this &#8220;fix&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nothing will make a consumer buy a new pc like the frustration of<br />
having a pc which locks up all the time with no service provider<br />
having the ability to figure out how to make it stop. </p>
<p>                              OR<br />
A dead laptop/pc which needs a $600 motherboard when you can buy a<br />
new one for $1000.</p>
<p>My unique process is the result of the need to find a fix for a non-<br />
detectable virus/malicous code which caused multiple<br />
hardware/software failures. I have a running list of 50 common<br />
failures/symptoms resolved by this process&#8230;.everything from<br />
locking up problems, to data overwritten by garbage, to dead<br />
motherboard, video board, NIC, to Disk I/O errors and general<br />
protection failures&#8230;.even a mac pc with a &#8220;damaged Hard drive&#8221;<br />
according to the operating system while attempting to initialize it.</p>
<p>This process works in DOS/Win 3.x, Win 9x, Win2K, Win 2000 network<br />
server os, and mac. Hard to say what else it will work on.</p>
<p>Based on my experience, It will work in every os there is. You can<br />
see an ad I wrote in an attempt to sell this process at<br />
Houston.Craigslist computer service section.</p>
<p>This info is not known by even the most experienced service<br />
providers as I have repaired desktops, laptops&#8230;even printer&#8217;s<br />
boards that were being thrown away by multiple service providers.</p>
<p>Have a great day,</p>
<p>Mike<br />
PS this process is both time and cost effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
