<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Introduces iPod Hi-Fi, Intel Mac Mini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25461</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25461</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to have a good stereo for your iPod I guess, but why are so many people regarding this as a revolutionary device? It&#039;s a stereo with an iPod dock.

It doesn&#039;t even have a bigger screen in case you want to see what music is playing without being too close to it.

I did like the new universal dock though compatible with the Apple Remote. Since I&#039;m getting an iPod soon it&#039;s perfect for me (since I don&#039;t have a stereo).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to have a good stereo for your iPod I guess, but why are so many people regarding this as a revolutionary device? It&#8217;s a stereo with an iPod dock.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t even have a bigger screen in case you want to see what music is playing without being too close to it.</p>
<p>I did like the new universal dock though compatible with the Apple Remote. Since I&#8217;m getting an iPod soon it&#8217;s perfect for me (since I don&#8217;t have a stereo).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truongn2</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25460</link>
		<dc:creator>truongn2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25460</guid>
		<description>This is really cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25459</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25459</guid>
		<description>Come on people. A Lemon from Apple was almost due. It has been a long time since the Cube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people. A Lemon from Apple was almost due. It has been a long time since the Cube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25458</guid>
		<description>What is even less impressive are the official leather sleeves. It&#039;s just a pouch. You can&#039;t even access the controls without removing the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is even less impressive are the official leather sleeves. It&#8217;s just a pouch. You can&#8217;t even access the controls without removing the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25457</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I won&#039;t be a blunt as cliche, but I am not very impressed by these releases either. Sure, the Mac Mini got an Intel processor and Front Row, but it would have been more impressive if it had some sort of DVR software on it.

As for the hi-fi, I think it is rather ugly and un-Apple. Not really an innovation, just playing catchup with other similar products that may be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I won&#8217;t be a blunt as cliche, but I am not very impressed by these releases either. Sure, the Mac Mini got an Intel processor and Front Row, but it would have been more impressive if it had some sort of DVR software on it.</p>
<p>As for the hi-fi, I think it is rather ugly and un-Apple. Not really an innovation, just playing catchup with other similar products that may be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliche</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/apple_introduces_ipod_hi_fi_intel_mac_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-25456</link>
		<dc:creator>cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2725#comment-25456</guid>
		<description>I hate to troll, but this fucking sucks.  The new boombox is nothing special in form and function, except for the ridiculous price tag.  The new minis get a faster processor, but the video cards now share memory with ram: Video is slower and less available ram.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it was actually slower than the old minis in real life applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to troll, but this fucking sucks.  The new boombox is nothing special in form and function, except for the ridiculous price tag.  The new minis get a faster processor, but the video cards now share memory with ram: Video is slower and less available ram.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it was actually slower than the old minis in real life applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
