<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s official: Vista Gamers will need 2GB of RAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:22:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maqo</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26070</link>
		<dc:creator>Maqo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 15:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26070</guid>
		<description>No, physical memory is physical memory, and the headline claims that Vista is using 1.24GB of it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, physical memory is physical memory, and the headline claims that Vista is using 1.24GB of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drugsbuy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26069</link>
		<dc:creator>drugsbuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26069</guid>
		<description>Hi :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADIPEX</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26068</link>
		<dc:creator>ADIPEX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26068</guid>
		<description>Hi :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26067</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26067</guid>
		<description>@Maqo - perhaps the OS is also counting the virtual memory use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Maqo &#8211; perhaps the OS is also counting the virtual memory use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maqo</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26066</link>
		<dc:creator>Maqo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26066</guid>
		<description>The system shown only &lt;b&gt;has&lt;/b&gt; 1GB of physical memory, how exactly do you get 1.24GB of RAM consumption?  Was this even a release version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The system shown only <b>has</b> 1GB of physical memory, how exactly do you get 1.24GB of RAM consumption?  Was this even a release version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilKat</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26065</link>
		<dc:creator>evilKat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26065</guid>
		<description>Yeah but blinds in my experience has led to more crashes than anything else on the few machines I tried it on and I can&#039;t say that I was entirely happy with the program. 

Lets face it, the XP GUI API sucks ass, and everything done to modify it felt like a hack. Windows blinds is just another hack on top of a hack. In the end I just didn&#039;t like it...even though it claimed to accelerate the GUI rendering using hardware I never saw a huge gain with it.

I don&#039;t think that blog link works anymore. I used to have my WP blog there but not anymore (switched servers). One of these days I&#039;m going to have to get it up and running again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but blinds in my experience has led to more crashes than anything else on the few machines I tried it on and I can&#8217;t say that I was entirely happy with the program. </p>
<p>Lets face it, the XP GUI API sucks ass, and everything done to modify it felt like a hack. Windows blinds is just another hack on top of a hack. In the end I just didn&#8217;t like it&#8230;even though it claimed to accelerate the GUI rendering using hardware I never saw a huge gain with it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that blog link works anymore. I used to have my WP blog there but not anymore (switched servers). One of these days I&#8217;m going to have to get it up and running again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26064</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26064</guid>
		<description>With Windows Blinds you can exactly the same eye candy with much less consumption. 

*That* is why I say this memory consumption by Vista is ridiculous. I&#039;m not even a mac user, I&#039;ve used Windows ever since I&#039;ve used a computer.

PS: evilKat, you need to put the contents of the wordpress.zip file on that folder, not the zip file itself. And don&#039;t upload the &quot;root&quot; Wordpress folder, otherwise your blog will be installed to evilkat.org/blog/wordpress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Windows Blinds you can exactly the same eye candy with much less consumption. </p>
<p>*That* is why I say this memory consumption by Vista is ridiculous. I&#8217;m not even a mac user, I&#8217;ve used Windows ever since I&#8217;ve used a computer.</p>
<p>PS: evilKat, you need to put the contents of the wordpress.zip file on that folder, not the zip file itself. And don&#8217;t upload the &#8220;root&#8221; Wordpress folder, otherwise your blog will be installed to evilkat.org/blog/wordpress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilKat</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26063</link>
		<dc:creator>evilKat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26063</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the fact that this is a friggin beta OS with unoptimized code paths. Talk about your anti-windows-Mac-fan boyz, sheesh. 

Having said that, by early 2K7 u could well need 2GB to run the latest and greatest games at max res with all eye candy on. But certainly not for Farcry with it&#039;s current game engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the fact that this is a friggin beta OS with unoptimized code paths. Talk about your anti-windows-Mac-fan boyz, sheesh. </p>
<p>Having said that, by early 2K7 u could well need 2GB to run the latest and greatest games at max res with all eye candy on. But certainly not for Farcry with it&#8217;s current game engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adross</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/its_official_vista_gamers_will_need_2gb_of_ram/comment-page-1/#comment-26062</link>
		<dc:creator>Adross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2813#comment-26062</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind, MS have made no claims to vista being &#039;done&#039;. I&#039;m sure, closer to release, much more optimisations will be in place.
Furthermore, that&#039;s running at full graphics, you neglected to mention that vista&#039;s gui can be scaled down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind, MS have made no claims to vista being &#8216;done&#8217;. I&#8217;m sure, closer to release, much more optimisations will be in place.<br />
Furthermore, that&#8217;s running at full graphics, you neglected to mention that vista&#8217;s gui can be scaled down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
