http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/windows_code_rewrite_fictional/ Nerds are for Dorks Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:11:50 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/windows_code_rewrite_fictional/comment-page-1/#comment-26075 evilKat Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:31:11 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2815#comment-26075 But certainly not 60%. I'll hedge my bets on the millennium edition as well. But certainly not 60%. I’ll hedge my bets on the millennium edition as well.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/windows_code_rewrite_fictional/comment-page-1/#comment-26074 Griffith Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:00:18 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2815#comment-26074 Well, I wouldn't find it surprising if they found that part of the code was bad. If that is true, Vista will just be a "Millennium Edition" software and will soon be obsolete. Well, I wouldn’t find it surprising if they found that part of the code was bad. If that is true, Vista will just be a “Millennium Edition” software and will soon be obsolete.

]]> http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/03/windows_code_rewrite_fictional/comment-page-1/#comment-26073 evilKat Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:31:06 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2815#comment-26073 60% re-write is not true?! Zomg how shocking. U'd think that if they can re-write 60% of the code in the remaining 7-8 months before delivery, then they'd have shipped Vista ages ago... 60% re-write is not true?! Zomg how shocking. U’d think that if they can re-write 60% of the code in the remaining 7-8 months before delivery, then they’d have shipped Vista ages ago…

]]>