Comments on: Wikipedia: Not so safe for kids after all! http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/ Nerds are for Dorks Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: consolidation credit cards http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27195 consolidation credit cards Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:37:18 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27195 I just don't have much to say recently. Maybe tomorrow. Pfft. Whatever. Today was a loss. I just don’t have much to say recently. Maybe tomorrow. Pfft. Whatever. Today was a loss.

]]> By: Glamour Models http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27194 Glamour Models Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:37:47 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27194 Genetic testing on unborn children is, is not ethical Genetic testing on unborn children is, is not ethical

]]> By: glamour girls http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27193 glamour girls Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:31:45 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27193 Quer aprender ASP?! Veja este material gratuito Quer aprender ASP?! Veja este material gratuito

]]> By: bobo http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27191 bobo Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:04:43 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27191 Theres a vagnor in the vagina article >_> Theres a vagnor in the vagina article >_>

]]> By: penis http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27190 penis Mon, 25 Dec 2006 12:42:55 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27190 get a life pal get a life pal

]]> By: many dental insurance http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27189 many dental insurance Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:58:53 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27189 My life's been basically boring recently. I've basically been doing nothing to speak of. That's how it is. I just don't have much to say recently. Oh well. I just don't have anything to say these days. I've just been sitting around doing nothing. More or less nothing seems worth bothering with. More or less nothing seems worth doing. I've just been letting everything wash over me lately. I just don't have anything to say lately. Shrug. I can't be bothered with anything lately. My life’s been basically boring recently. I’ve basically been doing nothing to speak of. That’s how it is. I just don’t have much to say recently. Oh well.
I just don’t have anything to say these days. I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing. More or less nothing seems worth bothering with.
More or less nothing seems worth doing. I’ve just been letting everything wash over me lately. I just don’t have anything to say lately. Shrug. I can’t be bothered with anything lately.

]]> By: Required http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27186 Required Wed, 10 May 2006 21:18:23 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27186 wheres the boobs?? boobs are NOT porngraphic, they are age appropriate.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audra_Lynn are you f'ing kidding me.. they used to have boobs on here.. okay so penis is okay but not boobs?? boobs are NOT pornographic.. you want boobs.. look at yourself in the mirror and play with your nipples for half an hour.. you telling me a gigantic penis with cum stuck to it is less offensive then gigantic boobs with cum stuck to it?? wikipedia is sexist i tell ya. wheres the boobs?? boobs are NOT porngraphic, they are age appropriate..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audra_Lynn

are you f’ing kidding me.. they used to have boobs on here.. okay so penis is okay but not boobs?? boobs are NOT pornographic.. you want boobs.. look at yourself in the mirror and play with your nipples for half an hour.. you telling me a gigantic penis with cum stuck to it is less offensive then gigantic boobs with cum stuck to it?? wikipedia is sexist i tell ya.

]]> By: A sane voice in the jungle http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27185 A sane voice in the jungle Tue, 02 May 2006 22:25:39 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27185 In any case, this blog has one less regular reader. I despise censorship in any way or form, so I will not be contributing to the hit statistics and the Google Adsense for this blog anymore. In the unlikely event anyone wants to reply to me, I can be reached at grnch@gmx.net, as I will not be checking this comment thread any further. In any case, this blog has one less regular reader. I despise censorship in any way or form, so I will not be contributing to the hit statistics and the Google Adsense for this blog anymore.

In the unlikely event anyone wants to reply to me, I can be reached at grnch@gmx.net, as I will not be checking this comment thread any further.

]]> By: A sane voice in the jungle http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27184 A sane voice in the jungle Tue, 02 May 2006 22:12:31 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27184 To #6 and #7: the post didn't contain any outside links or anything like that, just several paragraphs of text. When I tried posting it, I got a message to the effect "thank you for posting, your post will appear once it is approved". I noticed that this message doesn't come up always, maybe it's something to do with the length of the post or something else which caused it to be flagged for review, but even then, once it was reviewed by someone it should have been let through, since it wasn't spam or pointless insults. It was a politely stated contrary opinion. There was no error message, the system clearly acknowledged receiving the post. At that time I assumed this is a moderated blog or somesuch, but a week later the post is still not here, hence there is censorship going on. Whoever was supposed to "approve" the post, didn't. To #6 and #7: the post didn’t contain any outside links or anything like that, just several paragraphs of text. When I tried posting it, I got a message to the effect “thank you for posting, your post will appear once it is approved”. I noticed that this message doesn’t come up always, maybe it’s something to do with the length of the post or something else which caused it to be flagged for review, but even then, once it was reviewed by someone it should have been let through, since it wasn’t spam or pointless insults. It was a politely stated contrary opinion.

There was no error message, the system clearly acknowledged receiving the post. At that time I assumed this is a moderated blog or somesuch, but a week later the post is still not here, hence there is censorship going on. Whoever was supposed to “approve” the post, didn’t.

]]> By: jangelo http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27183 jangelo Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:38:23 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27183 Manchild: They took the second item down (the one for "sperm" with the cum-shot). I have high-res screenshots I'd be willing to share, though. Manchild:

They took the second item down (the one for “sperm” with the cum-shot). I have high-res screenshots I’d be willing to share, though.

]]> By: jangelo http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27182 jangelo Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:33:58 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27182 A sane voice in the jungle: I've been monitoring the comment threads and I didn't notice any comment here not pushing through. What was your comment, anyway? At any rate, I do post on this blog, but I don't have full admin access. Will check it out with those that have control. A sane voice in the jungle:

I’ve been monitoring the comment threads and I didn’t notice any comment here not pushing through. What was your comment, anyway?

At any rate, I do post on this blog, but I don’t have full admin access. Will check it out with those that have control.

]]> By: cliche http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27181 cliche Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:29:51 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27181 Let me take some guesses #5: Perhaps you had a link to another page? If so, those are blocked nowadays no matter what your post was about. If not, could you see your comments right after you posted, before a "censor" could possibly go through it and delete it? If you didn't see it, there was probably an error with you posting. The reason I'm giving Mr. Racoma the benifit of the doubt is the fact that I can see your #5 post right now. Also, I've said some negative things about FG staff before and they never got censored. Let me take some guesses #5:

Perhaps you had a link to another page? If so, those are blocked nowadays no matter what your post was about.

If not, could you see your comments right after you posted, before a “censor” could possibly go through it and delete it? If you didn’t see it, there was probably an error with you posting.

The reason I’m giving Mr. Racoma the benifit of the doubt is the fact that I can see your #5 post right now. Also, I’ve said some negative things about FG staff before and they never got censored.

]]> By: A sane voice in the jungle http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27180 A sane voice in the jungle Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:15:15 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27180 Nice going... you made all that noise about Digg censoring posts, only to turn around and do the exact same thing to any post you don't agree with. My post yesterday defending those images was not let through, it contained no profanity or vulgar language nor anything "inappropriate", just a critique. So, why was it censored? You didn't like another viewpoint on your precious blog? Hypocrites everywhere... Nice going… you made all that noise about Digg censoring posts, only to turn around and do the exact same thing to any post you don’t agree with.

My post yesterday defending those images was not let through, it contained no profanity or vulgar language nor anything “inappropriate”, just a critique. So, why was it censored? You didn’t like another viewpoint on your precious blog?

Hypocrites everywhere…

]]> By: manchld http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27179 manchld Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:49:20 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27179 So did you mark it as inappropriate or leave it so that your readers could see for themselves? I hope you got it deleted. So did you mark it as inappropriate or leave it so that your readers could see for themselves? I hope you got it deleted.

]]> By: Neserukan http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27178 Neserukan Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:01:05 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27178 MOMMY! MOMMY!

]]> By: jangelo http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27177 jangelo Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:48:50 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27177 The second one is more of a "cum-shot". The second one is more of a “cum-shot”.

]]> By: Echostorm http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/wikipedia_not_so_safe_for_kids_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-27176 Echostorm Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:38:58 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=2933#comment-27176 Its a penis. Its a penis.

]]>