<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macbooks Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marco (Griffith) Jardim</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/comment-page-1/#comment-27559</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco (Griffith) Jardim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2992#comment-27559</guid>
		<description>This is probably my next computer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably my next computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/comment-page-1/#comment-27558</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2992#comment-27558</guid>
		<description>Hey, double check Apple&#039;s website on the specs page of the new macbooks. The weight is actually 5.2 pounds (not 5.9). It&#039;s more than 1/4&quot; thinner than the iBooks were, but I really can&#039;t get over the brightness of the screen, especially when compared to the previous iBooksâIt&#039;s 79% brighter! Photobooth and Front Row look stunning on it, really. Sorry if this seems like a biased opinion, being a Mac Specialist myself, but just wanted to post my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, double check Apple&#8217;s website on the specs page of the new macbooks. The weight is actually 5.2 pounds (not 5.9). It&#8217;s more than 1/4&#8243; thinner than the iBooks were, but I really can&#8217;t get over the brightness of the screen, especially when compared to the previous iBooksâIt&#8217;s 79% brighter! Photobooth and Front Row look stunning on it, really. Sorry if this seems like a biased opinion, being a Mac Specialist myself, but just wanted to post my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/comment-page-1/#comment-27557</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 17:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2992#comment-27557</guid>
		<description>Yea, Apple is a corporation and as nice as they seem they won&#039;t refund any money unless its for PR reasons or a huge mistake made on their part. People are making the decision to pay more for the black so they are going to have to live with this decision. If customers didn&#039;t think it was worth it they would of went for the white in the first place.

I&#039;ve learned that no matter how silly Apple&#039;s decisions seem, there&#039;s always a reason for it. It&#039;s clear they&#039;ve had some success with the black iPod Nano. It is possible they also determined the power users are more likely to buy black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, Apple is a corporation and as nice as they seem they won&#8217;t refund any money unless its for PR reasons or a huge mistake made on their part. People are making the decision to pay more for the black so they are going to have to live with this decision. If customers didn&#8217;t think it was worth it they would of went for the white in the first place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned that no matter how silly Apple&#8217;s decisions seem, there&#8217;s always a reason for it. It&#8217;s clear they&#8217;ve had some success with the black iPod Nano. It is possible they also determined the power users are more likely to buy black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/macbooks_released/comment-page-1/#comment-27556</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2992#comment-27556</guid>
		<description>&quot;...maybe they will drop the premium for black exterior, and possibly refund any money paid for it before the units start shipping.&quot;

Ha hah... ahem, hahahaha... hahah...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH... heheh.

Dream on brother, dream on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;maybe they will drop the premium for black exterior, and possibly refund any money paid for it before the units start shipping.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha hah&#8230; ahem, hahahaha&#8230; hahah&#8230;</p>
<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH&#8230; heheh.</p>
<p>Dream on brother, dream on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
