<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wii likely to be under $160</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abscissa</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/comment-page-1/#comment-27754</link>
		<dc:creator>Abscissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3022#comment-27754</guid>
		<description>Since Nintendo is actively targeting the never-played-a-game croud, I think it&#039;s entirely reasonable to think they would go about $50 below their traditional $200 launch price.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Nintendo is actively targeting the never-played-a-game croud, I think it&#8217;s entirely reasonable to think they would go about $50 below their traditional $200 launch price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/comment-page-1/#comment-27753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3022#comment-27753</guid>
		<description>could this be an april fool&#039;s that is very late or very very very early? i want sources!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could this be an april fool&#8217;s that is very late or very very very early? i want sources!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nongamergreg</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/comment-page-1/#comment-27752</link>
		<dc:creator>Nongamergreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 18:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3022#comment-27752</guid>
		<description>1Up.com reports otherwise... $160 is a little unrealistic, even if the Wii is just a gamecube with fancy peripherals.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3151034</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1Up.com reports otherwise&#8230; $160 is a little unrealistic, even if the Wii is just a gamecube with fancy peripherals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3151034" rel="nofollow">http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3151034</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J78/jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/05/wii_likely_to_be_under_160/comment-page-1/#comment-27751</link>
		<dc:creator>J78/jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3022#comment-27751</guid>
		<description>That would be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
