Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
I remember when I first got into computers, and the Internet, I quickly began to wonder why, especially in Canada where I live, there was not more virtual classrooms, or digital classrooms, where students use technology to better understand what was being taught, and could even do so from home.
It could create scenerios where students must pool their skills, abilities and knowledge to create an answer.
For example, Harvard University’s “River City” is a MUVE that involves a society in the late 1800s that’s in political and environmental disrepair–kids must figure out why residents are falling ill.
You give them access to the information they need, and let them use their problem solving skills to find the answer. It could be amazing for the youths that want to learn, as well as helping those that learn better in certain special environments. Virtual learning can move things from being a concept to more of a tangible reality, allowing children to experience things rather than just read it from a book.
Wider adoption of Multi User Virtual Environments raises the question: Are virtual worlds the future of learning for the wired generation?
Ask some educators and they’ll tell you yes. That’s because research has shown that kids engage deeply in virtual environments, gaining a conceptual and ethical understanding of school subjects, according to education experts. And many kids are already comfortable socializing online, so educationally oriented virtual worlds can offer that same sort of stimulus and use that potential to aid learning. There’s one big caveat, however: Virtual worlds must have knowledgeable and motivated teachers driving the train.
I think the teachers have been the biggest limitation thus far, as moving away from traditional methods of teaching and technology use has to be spearheaded by the teachers, and the schools that train teachers, and they have been exceptionally slow to change and adopt new technologies.
I don’t think that virtual classrooms will ever totally replace school bound education, but I do think it could be a useful tool to extend education. Would you be interested in having your children learn in a virtual environment?
Read more on this at News.com’s interesting article about virtual classrooms.
MSN Virtual Earth
Twitter For Primary School?
SNES Virtual Console top sellers
Adults In Scotland Given Money To Learn Computers
Virtual Machine Shootout: VMWare vs. Virtual PC
Forever Geek is a resource for all things geek. You can stay tuned by having the latest FG news delivered to you for free via RSS.
Category: Uncategorized
Tags:

Netbooks and User Satisfaction: It’s All About Expectations
10 Cool Sony Walkman photos – celebrate Walkman’s 30th birthday
2 Responses for "Virtual Classroom"
June 12th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
1At my college, we have a ‘virtual learning environment’ – essentially a CMS with grading tools – called Moodle. It has the potential to be very, very good, but it fails beacause a) the teachers don’t put the effort into putting enough relevant course information online and b) students dont use the forums or log on to read news updates.
The result is that the VLE is basically used as a glorified hand-in-folder.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:27 am
2I agree that the “human factor” is necessary to teach and spread knowledge. Even in my specific field (multimedia and ICT), the penetration of a computer aided teaching is poor, compared to the big enthusiasm of a real dialogue.
The risk in the modern approach to divulgation, is a standardization of education, filtered by computers and web forms.
The skill to make connections in our knowledge, is greatly imporved by a real teacher, due to a unique empathetic relation by two human minds…
Marco
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply