Comments on: Nikon D40 gets reviewed at DPreview http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/12/nikon_d40_gets_reviewed_at_dpreview/ Nerds are for Dorks Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:14:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: foo http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/12/nikon_d40_gets_reviewed_at_dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-31744 foo Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:49:16 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=3821#comment-31744 It assumes that the motor is IN the lens which is more common in newer lenses. You have manually focus older lenses. It assumes that the motor is IN the lens which is more common in newer lenses.

You have manually focus older lenses.

]]> By: Marco (Griffith) Jardim http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/12/nikon_d40_gets_reviewed_at_dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-31743 Marco (Griffith) Jardim Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:39:34 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=3821#comment-31743 I think that there's a difference between the focus a lens does and the focus the software does. Well, at least in this case, but I'm no camera expert either, so I'd best leave this for a Pro to answer. I think that there’s a difference between the focus a lens does and the focus the software does. Well, at least in this case, but I’m no camera expert either, so I’d best leave this for a Pro to answer.

]]> By: Elementalist http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/12/nikon_d40_gets_reviewed_at_dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-31742 Elementalist Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:02:22 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=3821#comment-31742 Isn't the "AF" (AutoFocus?) lens a little misleading if there's no lens motor? I'm no camera expert so I may have just embarassed myself here... Isn’t the “AF” (AutoFocus?) lens a little misleading if there’s no lens motor?
I’m no camera expert so I may have just embarassed myself here…

]]>