Comments on: Vista less efficient than XP http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/02/vista_less_efficient_than_xp/ Nerds are for Dorks Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: evilkat http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/02/vista_less_efficient_than_xp/#comment-33647 evilkat Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:26:34 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=4041#comment-33647 What programs are you trying to install? I was installing stuff waay back in Vista RC1 dude.... What programs are you trying to install? I was installing stuff waay back in Vista RC1 dude….

]]> By: matt hoffman http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/02/vista_less_efficient_than_xp/#comment-33646 matt hoffman Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:53:47 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=4041#comment-33646 you cant even install new programs in it. my friend and i spent 2.5 hours tweaking it trying to figure it out but it still wouldnt work. vista is crap. you cant even install new programs in it. my friend and i spent 2.5 hours tweaking it trying to figure it out but it still wouldnt work. vista is crap.

]]> By: evilkat http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/02/vista_less_efficient_than_xp/#comment-33645 evilkat Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:50:02 +0000 http://forevergeek.com/?p=4041#comment-33645 Every single comment about performance/lack of drivers etc that is made of Vista is the same as those made when XP first came out. Those are the growing pains of adopting a brand new OS. If you're not ready to deal with them, don't buy the OS yet. For the casual user, there is no compelling reason to jump just yet. Every single comment about performance/lack of drivers etc that is made of Vista is the same as those made when XP first came out. Those are the growing pains of adopting a brand new OS. If you’re not ready to deal with them, don’t buy the OS yet.

For the casual user, there is no compelling reason to jump just yet.

]]>