<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons the next Spider-man flick should be &quot;Spider-Man 2099&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Noon</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-41858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Noon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-41858</guid>
		<description>If were going to do this right, we need Marvel back and we need to kick Disney premenatly out. And as for the casting goes, no Twilight actors, bring in an unknown actor as Miguel O&#039;hara, no Disney and NO Twillight actor-or Director or Producer! 
Hey Jacob Stock, Jake Noon here, I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve ever read the comics, but Spider-Man 2099 is complelty different from the other Spider-Men. See what i did their...aw classic. With the idea of Spider-Man 2099 being in the future seprates the other &quot;3&quot; universes; brining a whole new genaration of 2099 Spider-Man Movies to the big screen. And with that Miguel O&#039;hara is the future Spider-Man and the costume is much different from the other costumes and so are the... Villians, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If were going to do this right, we need Marvel back and we need to kick Disney premenatly out. And as for the casting goes, no Twilight actors, bring in an unknown actor as Miguel O&#8217;hara, no Disney and NO Twillight actor-or Director or Producer!<br />
Hey Jacob Stock, Jake Noon here, I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve ever read the comics, but Spider-Man 2099 is complelty different from the other Spider-Men. See what i did their&#8230;aw classic. With the idea of Spider-Man 2099 being in the future seprates the other &#8220;3&#8243; universes; brining a whole new genaration of 2099 Spider-Man Movies to the big screen. And with that Miguel O&#8217;hara is the future Spider-Man and the costume is much different from the other costumes and so are the&#8230; Villians, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Noon</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-41854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Noon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-41854</guid>
		<description>All your comments make a lot of sense. With the right director, story and cast and 3D will be a really good movie to see. It will re-write the Spider-Man franchise and people will be reintroduced to a whole new Spider-Man and a Spider-Man of the future. A story worth telling, along with a PG-13 rating. But it MUST Fallow the comics. So starting with the 1st Spider-Man 2099 comic book-an orgion story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your comments make a lot of sense. With the right director, story and cast and 3D will be a really good movie to see. It will re-write the Spider-Man franchise and people will be reintroduced to a whole new Spider-Man and a Spider-Man of the future. A story worth telling, along with a PG-13 rating. But it MUST Fallow the comics. So starting with the 1st Spider-Man 2099 comic book-an orgion story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-16000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-16000</guid>
		<description>Spiderman 2099 is amazing! This would be a kick ass movie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiderman 2099 is amazing! This would be a kick ass movie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda tarman</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15999</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda tarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15999</guid>
		<description>I think that Spiderman 2099 is B.S. why ruin the greatest super hero?!
Grrr you people get so annoying with your mechandising crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Spiderman 2099 is B.S. why ruin the greatest super hero?!<br />
Grrr you people get so annoying with your mechandising crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15998</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15998</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s now 2010 and no one else has commented.  Maybe spidy 2099 fanbase not strong enough?

Still, I would love to see a spidey 2099 - in 3D.  No need to rush it but take some real time and effort into making the film and I&#039;m guessing this could really become a big summer flick and attract more spidey 2099 fans.

Nothing against peter parker spidy though.  he&#039;s still my fave.  but miguel, he&#039;s a different character altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s now 2010 and no one else has commented.  Maybe spidy 2099 fanbase not strong enough?</p>
<p>Still, I would love to see a spidey 2099 &#8211; in 3D.  No need to rush it but take some real time and effort into making the film and I&#8217;m guessing this could really become a big summer flick and attract more spidey 2099 fans.</p>
<p>Nothing against peter parker spidy though.  he&#8217;s still my fave.  but miguel, he&#8217;s a different character altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: um gowa</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15997</link>
		<dc:creator>um gowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15997</guid>
		<description>[...] The stand out star of this line of comics was Spider-Man 2099. So who was Spider-Man 2099? How was hhttp://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.phpjricksFestival 25004 - Daddy Rolling Stone / Um gowa - 1962 Jimmy Ricks Arnold 1011 - Change Of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The stand out star of this line of comics was Spider-Man 2099. So who was Spider-Man 2099? How was hhttp://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.phpjricksFestival 25004 &#8211; Daddy Rolling Stone / Um gowa &#8211; 1962 Jimmy Ricks Arnold 1011 &#8211; Change Of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15996</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15996</guid>
		<description>@ Drew

I don&#039;t agree.  I think the name Spider-Man has an established fanbase.  I don&#039;t think you limit the audience by producing a different take on an established franchise.

For example, the Star Trek The Next Generation was hugely successful, while the Original cast was still succeeding in feature films.  I don&#039;t think the Next Generation only appealed to a niche market because those characters didn&#039;t have an established fan base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Drew</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree.  I think the name Spider-Man has an established fanbase.  I don&#8217;t think you limit the audience by producing a different take on an established franchise.</p>
<p>For example, the Star Trek The Next Generation was hugely successful, while the Original cast was still succeeding in feature films.  I don&#8217;t think the Next Generation only appealed to a niche market because those characters didn&#8217;t have an established fan base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15995</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15995</guid>
		<description>My only concern with that would be that the Spider-Man that we know has such a huge established fan base, both in the geek community and out, while 2099 would be much more of a niche audience.  That&#039;s a huge key to the success of a comic franchise like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only concern with that would be that the Spider-Man that we know has such a huge established fan base, both in the geek community and out, while 2099 would be much more of a niche audience.  That&#8217;s a huge key to the success of a comic franchise like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Snark</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15994</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 08:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15994</guid>
		<description>Sounds great, I&#039;m down.  As long as they don&#039;t make a Punisher 2099.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great, I&#8217;m down.  As long as they don&#8217;t make a Punisher 2099.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Conway</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15993</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Conway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15993</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean and agree that it would be very interesting. After a while, the excessive baggage of a character&#039;s mythology start to drag  a franchise down. The little Ive heard about the third installment makes me think this one may not be as good as the others. Anyway, my sense is that no one will want to mess with the franchise until they run it into the ground first.

How about a reimagined x files? Erase the board and start all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean and agree that it would be very interesting. After a while, the excessive baggage of a character&#8217;s mythology start to drag  a franchise down. The little Ive heard about the third installment makes me think this one may not be as good as the others. Anyway, my sense is that no one will want to mess with the franchise until they run it into the ground first.</p>
<p>How about a reimagined x files? Erase the board and start all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elderly Spider-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099/#comment-15992</link>
		<dc:creator>Elderly Spider-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/comics/5_reasons_the_next_spider-man_flick_should_be_spider-man_2099.php#comment-15992</guid>
		<description>http://one.revver.com/watch/253035</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://one.revver.com/watch/253035" rel="nofollow">http://one.revver.com/watch/253035</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

