<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fans ressurect Longhorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/fans_ressurect_longhorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/fans_ressurect_longhorn/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/fans_ressurect_longhorn/#comment-33956</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/windows/fans_ressurect_longhorn.php#comment-33956</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really tried it, but I did try Longhorn back in &quot;those days&quot;, and, in terms of usability, or functionality, there really wasn&#039;t anything I thought that the Operative System needed to make it feel more complete.

And in all honesty, most of the advances from the stage that Longhorn was in, were basically in the re-arranging some menus, and redesigning the interface by making it worse, in some aspects, compared to XP. Those jokes about Vista being a Windows XP with a fancy skin didn&#039;t come from nowhere. Since Microsoft ditched WinFS, that&#039;s pretty much what Vista became.

It doesn&#039;t feel better, it just feels different. But at least now Windows looks as fragile as it is (it looks like it&#039;s made out of glass).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really tried it, but I did try Longhorn back in &#8220;those days&#8221;, and, in terms of usability, or functionality, there really wasn&#8217;t anything I thought that the Operative System needed to make it feel more complete.</p>
<p>And in all honesty, most of the advances from the stage that Longhorn was in, were basically in the re-arranging some menus, and redesigning the interface by making it worse, in some aspects, compared to XP. Those jokes about Vista being a Windows XP with a fancy skin didn&#8217;t come from nowhere. Since Microsoft ditched WinFS, that&#8217;s pretty much what Vista became.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t feel better, it just feels different. But at least now Windows looks as fragile as it is (it looks like it&#8217;s made out of glass).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J44xm</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/fans_ressurect_longhorn/#comment-33955</link>
		<dc:creator>J44xm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 09:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/windows/fans_ressurect_longhorn.php#comment-33955</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t see that coming. But wouldn&#039;t it be a fairly incomplete OS? I suppose it&#039;s usable, but I wonder to what extent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see that coming. But wouldn&#8217;t it be a fairly incomplete OS? I suppose it&#8217;s usable, but I wonder to what extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

