<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Came from the 90s: Superman Red/Superman Blue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: g-man</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/#comment-16042</link>
		<dc:creator>g-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/entertainment/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue.php#comment-16042</guid>
		<description>u know for someone who just dissed the whole super man of the 90&#039;s, u sure did read the all huh.  u know u seem like u dont care, but u read them all.  u know what nerd i dont care, and never have read them.  some dude said something about electric superman, got me curious, and this is 2010,  a decade after this shit came out.  ur a nerd, admit it.  u dont have any original ideas of ur own, otherwise ud be the rich guy at DC, not the tool living in his parents basement.  delete this comment of u want.  i think its funny that u try and dis someone elses ideas, but still continue to read it.  when u cant think of any of ur own.  tool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u know for someone who just dissed the whole super man of the 90&#8242;s, u sure did read the all huh.  u know u seem like u dont care, but u read them all.  u know what nerd i dont care, and never have read them.  some dude said something about electric superman, got me curious, and this is 2010,  a decade after this shit came out.  ur a nerd, admit it.  u dont have any original ideas of ur own, otherwise ud be the rich guy at DC, not the tool living in his parents basement.  delete this comment of u want.  i think its funny that u try and dis someone elses ideas, but still continue to read it.  when u cant think of any of ur own.  tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nave Hayder</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/#comment-16041</link>
		<dc:creator>Nave Hayder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/entertainment/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue.php#comment-16041</guid>
		<description>I agree that the stunt was strained but lets not crucify it as a wholly terrible idea. Sure, the 90s were about gimmicks, true, but if we look at the modern age of comic books (an era which is apparently the newest favorite thing to hate these days--though i don&#039;t see why) the Superman Blue did encompass many of its better traits.

I like how your post points to this precisely (and why I&#039;m taking the time to respond to a blog, knowing that no one&#039;ll probably respond to what i&#039;m gonna say here). But was Superman Blue really that bad an idea? I mean, the &quot;split&quot; did have a unique twist that I enjoyed: it gave us a Supes who was all about REASON, and another Supes that was all about PASSION. Very reminiscent of the two modes of philosophical thought in Western Civilization. And placing a celebrating figure like Superman in philosophical symbolism is never a bad idea (unless it&#039;s as poorly delivered as Superman Returns ... which was just terrible. No matter how many Jesus-references you evoke). Of course, I completely agree with your dissent against the story itself; it was terribly delivered. But I&#039;d like to hold that the move was bold and does have a way of redeeming itself had it been written/delivered properly.

Superman Blue ranks up there as one of the worst moments in comic-history, right along the lines of DK: Strikes Again (and this from a Frank Miller fanatic). But I think that the story could&#039;ve been one of the most memorable, and best, if the editors had come up with it a few years prior to Y2K: i&#039;m talking during the Reign of the Supermen crossover. Had Kal-El returned with this visage, the story MAY have been redeemed. I suppose we mustn&#039;t ponder on &#039;what could&#039;ve beens&#039; but still...who knows? As for the design and powers themselves, they just reminded me of a toned-down version of Captain Atom, so that needed alteration as well.

What still keeps me hooked is... with Superman Blue, DC did what they dared not to in ages: they attempted to revise the REAL Superman. And through revision, they changed him completely. I like to think that that the Modern Age of Comic Books have 3 stages (of course, in retrospect): They are 1. The Retelling (DKR, Year One, Man of Steel etc.) 2. The Fall (Superman&#039;s death, Batman&#039;s spine shattering, Hal Jordan turning Parallax) and 3. The Rebirth (The NEW age-heroes like Jean-Paul, the 4 Supermen, Wally West and Kyle Rayner etc). Unfortunately, the latter two weren&#039;t exactly great ideas, but they are nonetheless important ones.

With the Reign of the Supermen, we got the Rebirth quite well, thus making Superman Blue redundant, and yet we see an attempt being made. A failure, yes, but an attempt - an experimentation on a legendary character - nevertheless. And THAT&#039;S why I&#039;ll still have a place for Superman Blue in the continuity that I choose to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the stunt was strained but lets not crucify it as a wholly terrible idea. Sure, the 90s were about gimmicks, true, but if we look at the modern age of comic books (an era which is apparently the newest favorite thing to hate these days&#8211;though i don&#8217;t see why) the Superman Blue did encompass many of its better traits.</p>
<p>I like how your post points to this precisely (and why I&#8217;m taking the time to respond to a blog, knowing that no one&#8217;ll probably respond to what i&#8217;m gonna say here). But was Superman Blue really that bad an idea? I mean, the &#8220;split&#8221; did have a unique twist that I enjoyed: it gave us a Supes who was all about REASON, and another Supes that was all about PASSION. Very reminiscent of the two modes of philosophical thought in Western Civilization. And placing a celebrating figure like Superman in philosophical symbolism is never a bad idea (unless it&#8217;s as poorly delivered as Superman Returns &#8230; which was just terrible. No matter how many Jesus-references you evoke). Of course, I completely agree with your dissent against the story itself; it was terribly delivered. But I&#8217;d like to hold that the move was bold and does have a way of redeeming itself had it been written/delivered properly.</p>
<p>Superman Blue ranks up there as one of the worst moments in comic-history, right along the lines of DK: Strikes Again (and this from a Frank Miller fanatic). But I think that the story could&#8217;ve been one of the most memorable, and best, if the editors had come up with it a few years prior to Y2K: i&#8217;m talking during the Reign of the Supermen crossover. Had Kal-El returned with this visage, the story MAY have been redeemed. I suppose we mustn&#8217;t ponder on &#8216;what could&#8217;ve beens&#8217; but still&#8230;who knows? As for the design and powers themselves, they just reminded me of a toned-down version of Captain Atom, so that needed alteration as well.</p>
<p>What still keeps me hooked is&#8230; with Superman Blue, DC did what they dared not to in ages: they attempted to revise the REAL Superman. And through revision, they changed him completely. I like to think that that the Modern Age of Comic Books have 3 stages (of course, in retrospect): They are 1. The Retelling (DKR, Year One, Man of Steel etc.) 2. The Fall (Superman&#8217;s death, Batman&#8217;s spine shattering, Hal Jordan turning Parallax) and 3. The Rebirth (The NEW age-heroes like Jean-Paul, the 4 Supermen, Wally West and Kyle Rayner etc). Unfortunately, the latter two weren&#8217;t exactly great ideas, but they are nonetheless important ones.</p>
<p>With the Reign of the Supermen, we got the Rebirth quite well, thus making Superman Blue redundant, and yet we see an attempt being made. A failure, yes, but an attempt &#8211; an experimentation on a legendary character &#8211; nevertheless. And THAT&#8217;S why I&#8217;ll still have a place for Superman Blue in the continuity that I choose to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J44xm</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/#comment-16040</link>
		<dc:creator>J44xm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/entertainment/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue.php#comment-16040</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I remember that. Pretty weak stuff. But to be fair, it must be hard coming up with good ideas for a series that will apparently never end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I remember that. Pretty weak stuff. But to be fair, it must be hard coming up with good ideas for a series that will apparently never end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Funda &#124; It Came from the 90s: Superman Red/Superman Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/05/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue/#comment-16039</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Funda &#124; It Came from the 90s: Superman Red/Superman Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/entertainment/it_came_from_the_90s_superman_redsuperman_blue.php#comment-16039</guid>
		<description>[...] (more&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (more&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

