<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Command and Conquer: First Person Shooter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/12/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/12/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Nick Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/12/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter/#comment-42274</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Nick Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/games/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter.php#comment-42274</guid>
		<description>I thought Renegade wasn&#039;t as bad as some reviews made it out to be. It did certainly have its share of faults (poor A.I. was probably the major fault), but it was enjoyable, multiplayer mode in particular. 
But I totally agree with you about people expecting a lot from the C&amp;C franchise, and Renegade didn&#039;t live up to enough people&#039;s expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Renegade wasn&#8217;t as bad as some reviews made it out to be. It did certainly have its share of faults (poor A.I. was probably the major fault), but it was enjoyable, multiplayer mode in particular.<br />
But I totally agree with you about people expecting a lot from the C&amp;C franchise, and Renegade didn&#8217;t live up to enough people&#8217;s expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/12/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter/#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/games/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter.php#comment-5276</guid>
		<description>Yeah, one of the major missteps I alluded to. :) The issue has always been that people don&#039;t really want a C&amp;C FPS, so it has to be AMAZING. Renegade wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, one of the major missteps I alluded to. :) The issue has always been that people don&#8217;t really want a C&#038;C FPS, so it has to be AMAZING. Renegade wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2007/12/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter/#comment-5275</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/games/command_and_conquer_first_person_shooter.php#comment-5275</guid>
		<description>was there not a c&amp;c renegade that did c&amp;c universe in fps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was there not a c&amp;c renegade that did c&amp;c universe in fps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

