When the first MP3 players emerged iRiver was the most popular brand of music players. I still know a couple of people who own their first (or second) CD players that could read MP3-format files. Unfortunately for them, Apple’s dominance, and the lack of innovation in their products, brought them down to the level of the other less-known DAP manufacturers.
The iRiver E100 is the latest offer from them, but, despite their efforts, it lands closer to Microsoft’s new flash-based Zune players than Apple’s dominant iPod Nanos.
The design of the player is very slick, despite seeming a bit thick compared to it’s rivals. The only things I did not like, in terms of aspect, were the two dotted speaker spots. in the player. There are many more elegant ways to place speaker holes on a DAP, but iRiver simply didn’t try.
With that pushed aside, the iRiver has a 2.4″ screen which is slightly larger than the current iPod Nanos and has a vertical orientation like most cellphones. The interface is reminiscent to the one seen in the Zune, although the main menu is slightly less functional as you can see on the following picture.
As for the player’s controls, they are possibly it’s biggest problem. The player uses a traditional D-Pad spread across a large rectangular area. On a positive note, the large area makes the player easier to operate if you have it in your pocket, but on a negative one, it also makes it easier for you to accidentally press some random button and makes scrolling harder (and the short interface lag the reviewer speaks of doesn’t help).
Thankfully the “bad news” end with that last paragraph, and everything from hereon everything is positive.
The audio quality is very good thanks to the SRS WOW HD technology the player uses, and Linux aficionados will be glad to hear that the player supports the OGG audio format as well as most of the other popular formats like: MP3, WMA, OGG, ASF and FLAC (no AAC compatibility I’m afraid).
Those of you who like to get your video fix on-the-go will also be glad to hear that the player supports the Xvid codec, and that alone makes this player worthwhile. It can also play the “traditional” MPEG4 and WMV9 video files.
The battery life rivals the iPod Nano’s as it can play music for 25 hours and video for 5 (the Nano can play media for 25 and 5 hours respectively). Though unlike the iPod Nano, this player can also receive and record FM radio and can be expanded thanks to a Micro SD slot, which makes it ideal to show your cellphone’s photos on a bigger screen.
Bottomline: This player brings very little in terms of innovation but it’s format compatibility makes it a very interesting choice for Windows and Linux users. If it’s controls were just a bit better, rather than a bit different, I would give this player a better rating, but, as it is, I give it a 3.5 out of 5.
[Source: Akihabaranews]
[...] Wired iPod, iPod News, iPod Forums, iPod Nano, iPod Classic, iPod Shuffle wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt When the first MP3 players emerged iRiver was the most popular brand of music players. I still know a couple of people who own their first (or second) CD players that could read MP3-format files. Unfortunately for them, Apple’s dominance, and the lack of innovation in their products, brought them down to the level of the other less-known DAP manufacturers. The iRiver E100 is the latest offer from them, but, despite their efforts, it lands closer to Microsoft’s new flash-based Zune players than [...]
[...] Each Note Secure wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt When the first MP3 players emerged iRiver was the most popular brand of music players. I still know a couple of people who own their first (or second) CD players that could read MP3-format files. Unfortunately for them, Apple’s dominance, and the lack of innovation in their products, brought them down to the level of the other less-known DAP manufacturers. The iRiver E100 is the latest offer from them, but, despite their efforts, it lands closer to Microsoft’s new flash-based Zune players than [...]
[...] dailywireless.org wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]
[...] rivalslayer wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptWhen the first MP3 players emerged iRiver was the most popular brand of music players. I still know a couple of people who own their first (or second) CD players that could read MP3-format files. Unfortunately for them, Apple’s … [...]
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
I absolutely hate interface lag, there’s nothing worse. It’s either sloppy programming or the processor is too slow…
This review is even worst than the Akiahabara news review. Review something taht you don’t have to review, is the way to go.
“The audio quality is very good thanks to the SRS WOW HD technology the player uses”
This make me laugh
Ok, if there was an amazon alike question about reviews asking:
“Was this review helpful to you?”
The answer would definitely be NO.
One needs to read more on sound quality (testing equipment and comparison with other mp3 players, fm reception, GUI, etc.)
Iriver Video Mp3 Players…
The term is used colloquially for any kind of Linkback.A Trackback is one of three types of Linkbacks, methods for Web authors to request…
It supports OGG and FLAC so that’s nice for Linux users, however the iRiver + 3 software used to load the darn thing doesn’t work on Linux (not even under Wine).
So its pretty useless to Linux users that actually want to do fancy things like use playlists.
wait… you’re reviewing.. what, someone else’s review? You don’t actually have one yourself, you’re just looking at a picture of it and sponging what someone else said about it?
This is the worst music player that I have ever had.
You failed to mention that there is no shuffle option (surely a basic essential).
That if you set the player to ‘sleep’ after (after an hour, for example when going to sleep) then the next time you turn it on it will turn off automatically and considering how long it takes to turn on this is unbelievably annoying.
The files are not listed in alphabetic order so when you search through Artists/Albums it is a nightmare.
The buttons are rubbish, sod that for a nice design. The slow response time makes tuning in Radio stations something of a traumatic experience and there is no ‘scroll to find station automatically’ function (whatever you would call that).
The lag is insanely irritating.
There are more basic music players that are cheaper and have a better design.
What I will say is that the sound is very good, and the speakers are better than the iPod. I don’t see the speakers as being a huge bonus though because the quality of music player speakers will never be good or loud enough to function without external speakers anyway.
I was so disappointed with iRiver, I’ve raved about them to everyone and always favoured them over Apple. I’ve held out on getting an iPod for years because I was always able to find something better but this player has literally broken my spirt and I may just have to give in…