<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google that never was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/03/the_google_that_never_was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/03/the_google_that_never_was/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:15:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: article archive</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/03/the_google_that_never_was/comment-page-1/#comment-39188</link>
		<dc:creator>article archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/articles/the_google_that_never_was.php#comment-39188</guid>
		<description>[...] as authorities step up efforts to ???stamp out??? the practice in advancchinaview.wordpress.comThe Google that never was An interesting article emerged today about some of the features that Google lost, or had to drop, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as authorities step up efforts to ???stamp out??? the practice in advancchinaview.wordpress.comThe Google that never was An interesting article emerged today about some of the features that Google lost, or had to drop, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Google that never was &#124; My Geek Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/03/the_google_that_never_was/comment-page-1/#comment-39185</link>
		<dc:creator>The Google that never was &#124; My Geek Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/articles/the_google_that_never_was.php#comment-39185</guid>
		<description>[...] alan wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAn interesting article emerged today about some of the features that Google lost, or had to drop, over the years. While the tendency back then was to see more and more applications and projects emerging, not all of them worked out. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alan wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAn interesting article emerged today about some of the features that Google lost, or had to drop, over the years. While the tendency back then was to see more and more applications and projects emerging, not all of them worked out. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Google that never was</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/03/the_google_that_never_was/comment-page-1/#comment-39184</link>
		<dc:creator>The Google that never was</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/articles/the_google_that_never_was.php#comment-39184</guid>
		<description>[...] Gawker, Manhattan Media News and Gossip wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gawker, Manhattan Media News and Gossip wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
