<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon IXUS 970</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:41:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jörn Zaefferer</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörn Zaefferer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39315</guid>
		<description>I think both are okay in that area, but the 970 could have the advantage of one and a half year of additional design consideration. For example, the positioning of the buttons around the dial changed quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both are okay in that area, but the 970 could have the advantage of one and a half year of additional design consideration. For example, the positioning of the buttons around the dial changed quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Butterscotch</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Butterscotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39310</guid>
		<description>Not had any experience with the 960 I&#039;m afraid, but on looking that up it looks like a pretty good phone too.  Would you see the benefit of the zoom or would you prefer to keep the pixel number higher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not had any experience with the 960 I&#8217;m afraid, but on looking that up it looks like a pretty good phone too.  Would you see the benefit of the zoom or would you prefer to keep the pixel number higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jörn Zaefferer</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39298</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörn Zaefferer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39298</guid>
		<description>I bought the IXUS 960 IS last week, not noticing that the 970 was out.

Now I wonder if I should send the 960 back and get the 970 instead. The price is mostly identical, my SD card works anyway.

What I found in the stats: 970 has more zoom (5x instead of 3x), less MB (10 instead of 12), smaller CCD sensor, and some other weird stuff I don&#039;t what its about.

More zoom: Good
Less Megapixel: Well, 12 is too much anyway, good.
Smaller sensor: Bad, in theory, not sure if it actually matters

Anyone any experience with those two? Is it worth switchting (as long as I get my money back for the 960)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the IXUS 960 IS last week, not noticing that the 970 was out.</p>
<p>Now I wonder if I should send the 960 back and get the 970 instead. The price is mostly identical, my SD card works anyway.</p>
<p>What I found in the stats: 970 has more zoom (5x instead of 3x), less MB (10 instead of 12), smaller CCD sensor, and some other weird stuff I don&#8217;t what its about.</p>
<p>More zoom: Good<br />
Less Megapixel: Well, 12 is too much anyway, good.<br />
Smaller sensor: Bad, in theory, not sure if it actually matters</p>
<p>Anyone any experience with those two? Is it worth switchting (as long as I get my money back for the 960)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon IXUS 970 &#124; My Geek Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39294</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon IXUS 970 &#124; My Geek Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39294</guid>
		<description>[...] Faitayuu, Onnifuji wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCanon’s new compact digital camera - the IXUS 970 - looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faitayuu, Onnifuji wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCanon’s new compact digital camera &#8211; the IXUS 970 &#8211; looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon IXUS 970 &#124; MLM Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39292</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon IXUS 970 &#124; MLM Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39292</guid>
		<description>[...] reload prepaid dgn sms wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Canon’s new compact digital camera - the IXUS 970 - looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete with your old SLR (though possibly not your brand-new SLR with the fancy lens). The blurb from Canon states: With a powerful 5x zoom lens, the Digital IXUS 970 IS is well equipped and intelligent, but never compromises on style. Its compact body is packed wit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reload prepaid dgn sms wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Canon’s new compact digital camera &#8211; the IXUS 970 &#8211; looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete with your old SLR (though possibly not your brand-new SLR with the fancy lens). The blurb from Canon states: With a powerful 5x zoom lens, the Digital IXUS 970 IS is well equipped and intelligent, but never compromises on style. Its compact body is packed wit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon IXUS 970 &#183; Buwin Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39291</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon IXUS 970 &#183; Buwin Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39291</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; Canon IXUS 970</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39290</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; Canon IXUS 970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39290</guid>
		<description>[...] Forever Geek - Nerds are for Dorks placed an interesting blog post on Canon IXUS 970Here&#8217;s a brief overview [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Forever Geek &#8211; Nerds are for Dorks placed an interesting blog post on Canon IXUS 970Here&#8217;s a brief overview [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UpComingCamera.Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon IXUS 970</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39289</link>
		<dc:creator>UpComingCamera.Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon IXUS 970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39289</guid>
		<description>[...] they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; MORE &gt;&gt;Creadit By weight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; MORE &gt;&gt;Creadit By weight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam Auctions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon IXUS 970</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/04/canon_ixus_970/comment-page-1/#comment-39288</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Auctions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon IXUS 970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/gadgets/canon_ixus_970.php#comment-39288</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew - UK Digital Cameras wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCanon’s new compact digital camera - the IXUS 970 - looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew &#8211; UK Digital Cameras wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCanon’s new compact digital camera &#8211; the IXUS 970 &#8211; looks the business, and with good reason. It is one of the most impressive (and powerful) that they have ever built. In fact, it is so high quality; it should well be able to compete &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
