<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Classic now in 120GB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:08:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41969</guid>
		<description>Well JC, to each his own I guess.  What doesn&#039;t make sense to you, does to me.  I hope you&#039;d forgive me for having a different view from yours. But thanks for sharing your views.  Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well JC, to each his own I guess.  What doesn&#8217;t make sense to you, does to me.  I hope you&#8217;d forgive me for having a different view from yours. But thanks for sharing your views.  Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Butterscotch</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41967</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Butterscotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41967</guid>
		<description>I totally agree Mel, it&#039;s time that Apple stopped this nonsense of forcing you to go through their software.  It&#039;s exactly why I buy Creative music products and not anything from Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree Mel, it&#8217;s time that Apple stopped this nonsense of forcing you to go through their software.  It&#8217;s exactly why I buy Creative music products and not anything from Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41953</guid>
		<description>What I want to see is Apple makig iTunes sync-ing an optional feature. I personally prefer drag and drop library management. I have so many MP3s that it won&#039;t fit even on a 500gb hard drive. With iTunes you&#039;re always required to have a copy of the iPod&#039;s contents on your hard drive and that&#039;s a big hassle for me. Unfortunately, Anapod Explorer doesn&#039;t work on the new generation iPods anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to see is Apple makig iTunes sync-ing an optional feature. I personally prefer drag and drop library management. I have so many MP3s that it won&#8217;t fit even on a 500gb hard drive. With iTunes you&#8217;re always required to have a copy of the iPod&#8217;s contents on your hard drive and that&#8217;s a big hassle for me. Unfortunately, Anapod Explorer doesn&#8217;t work on the new generation iPods anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41943</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41943</guid>
		<description>&quot;it made more sense&quot; doesn&#039;t. Don&#039;t try to save face when your original article reads as if they&#039;d never had that much storage before.

As for it being better, I must have missed the throngs of people saying &quot;please, please, give us less storage&quot;

Genius will be available via an update for all of the classics. All they did was bump their smaller model and discontinue the larger one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it made more sense&#8221; doesn&#8217;t. Don&#8217;t try to save face when your original article reads as if they&#8217;d never had that much storage before.</p>
<p>As for it being better, I must have missed the throngs of people saying &#8220;please, please, give us less storage&#8221;</p>
<p>Genius will be available via an update for all of the classics. All they did was bump their smaller model and discontinue the larger one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41928</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41928</guid>
		<description>Heya Rob, yup, I know it was 160GB before.  &quot;Better&quot; was because now it made more sense.  Nobody I knew maxed out 160GB anyway.  I believe the newer features is Genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya Rob, yup, I know it was 160GB before.  &#8220;Better&#8221; was because now it made more sense.  Nobody I knew maxed out 160GB anyway.  I believe the newer features is Genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41927</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41927</guid>
		<description>You realize that the previous generation of Ipod Classics went up to 160gb?  

I don&#039;t feel that moving down to 120 was a bad move for them at all, but its not like they actually added any new features to the classic at all from what I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You realize that the previous generation of Ipod Classics went up to 160gb?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel that moving down to 120 was a bad move for them at all, but its not like they actually added any new features to the classic at all from what I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Butterscotch</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2008/09/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb/comment-page-1/#comment-41925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Butterscotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/general/ipod_classic_now_in_120gb.php#comment-41925</guid>
		<description>That is amazing.  So much space.  It does beg the question of what you&#039;d do with it all.  And how long it would take to turn that many CD&#039;s into Apple&#039;s stupid format, before then moving them across to the player...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is amazing.  So much space.  It does beg the question of what you&#8217;d do with it all.  And how long it would take to turn that many CD&#8217;s into Apple&#8217;s stupid format, before then moving them across to the player&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
