<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now the iPod shuffle talks back, but why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/now_the_ipod_shuffle_talks_back_but_why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/now_the_ipod_shuffle_talks_back_but_why/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Apple want to be exclusive, niche again?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/now_the_ipod_shuffle_talks_back_but_why/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Apple want to be exclusive, niche again?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11640#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>[...] Claims about Steve Jobs&#8217; health and the decision of the shareholders to re-elect the Apple Board throw a weird shadow on new releases and their _special_ features such as yesterday&#8217;s iPod Shuffle update. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Claims about Steve Jobs&#8217; health and the decision of the shareholders to re-elect the Apple Board throw a weird shadow on new releases and their _special_ features such as yesterday&#8217;s iPod Shuffle update. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/now_the_ipod_shuffle_talks_back_but_why/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11640#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. I think it&#039;d be tough to patent it as that pesky VoiceOver technology has been on Mac OS X for a while now. Now, I wonder if it uses &quot;Bruce&quot; or that really bizarre alien laughing voice? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. I think it&#8217;d be tough to patent it as that pesky VoiceOver technology has been on Mac OS X for a while now. Now, I wonder if it uses &#8220;Bruce&#8221; or that really bizarre alien laughing voice? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanut</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/now_the_ipod_shuffle_talks_back_but_why/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11640#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>You may scoff but I think this is a great idea.  My friend was actually suggesting this as a feature about a month ago, saying she has a lot of random music on her Shuffle and can&#039;t always remember the name/artist of a song.  She&#039;s kicking herself now for not patenting it sooner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may scoff but I think this is a great idea.  My friend was actually suggesting this as a feature about a month ago, saying she has a lot of random music on her Shuffle and can&#8217;t always remember the name/artist of a song.  She&#8217;s kicking herself now for not patenting it sooner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

