<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Epic Apple Fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-931</guid>
		<description>What about iOS 4 on a 3g iPhone? Kills the thing, the OS does. Oh wait and they have no way to downgrade the iPhone because they are terrified of &quot;jailbreaking&quot;. That is real forethought Apple, amazing, truly... amazing.

@joe do you work at Apple? Didn&#039;t think so, so that makes you an expert on their products right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about iOS 4 on a 3g iPhone? Kills the thing, the OS does. Oh wait and they have no way to downgrade the iPhone because they are terrified of &#8220;jailbreaking&#8221;. That is real forethought Apple, amazing, truly&#8230; amazing.</p>
<p>@joe do you work at Apple? Didn&#8217;t think so, so that makes you an expert on their products right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Dear @Joe,

1) This was an entertainment piece meant for kicks and giggles, not to be taken as gospel, and certainly not meant to offend the Apple faithful (which I consider myself one of -- I think of my iPad as my third child).

2) None of the opinions expressed in the article were technically &quot;mine&quot; per se. This was not an opinion piece; it was a retrospective. I researched the history of Apple products and picked five of the gadgets most considered to be failures by the public at large. Google any one of them if you don&#039;t believe me.

3) I can let the rest of your comments go, but I&#039;m offended by this one:

&lt;I&gt;Too bad it’s so easy for loud-mouthed bloggers who couldn’t create anything new if their lives depended no it to publish goofy articles like this. The Internet would be a lot more useful if only intelligent articles were published.&lt;/I&gt;

As it happens, I&#039;m a published novelist; my fifth novel, Nightmare, just became available in stores nationwide. Look me up at Amazon, Barnes &amp; Noble, Borders, Books-A-Million, or any other book-selling website, and at your local bookstore.

I appreciate and share your intense love for all things Apple, but taking it so personally as to resort to meaningless insults is uncalled for. Particularly when you know nothing whatsoever about the person you&#039;re smearing across the pavement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear @Joe,</p>
<p>1) This was an entertainment piece meant for kicks and giggles, not to be taken as gospel, and certainly not meant to offend the Apple faithful (which I consider myself one of &#8212; I think of my iPad as my third child).</p>
<p>2) None of the opinions expressed in the article were technically &#8220;mine&#8221; per se. This was not an opinion piece; it was a retrospective. I researched the history of Apple products and picked five of the gadgets most considered to be failures by the public at large. Google any one of them if you don&#8217;t believe me.</p>
<p>3) I can let the rest of your comments go, but I&#8217;m offended by this one:</p>
<p><i>Too bad it’s so easy for loud-mouthed bloggers who couldn’t create anything new if their lives depended no it to publish goofy articles like this. The Internet would be a lot more useful if only intelligent articles were published.</i></p>
<p>As it happens, I&#8217;m a published novelist; my fifth novel, Nightmare, just became available in stores nationwide. Look me up at Amazon, Barnes &#038; Noble, Borders, Books-A-Million, or any other book-selling website, and at your local bookstore.</p>
<p>I appreciate and share your intense love for all things Apple, but taking it so personally as to resort to meaningless insults is uncalled for. Particularly when you know nothing whatsoever about the person you&#8217;re smearing across the pavement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-929</guid>
		<description>@Joe,

&lt;em&gt;Why is their opinion worth any less than yours?&lt;/em&gt;

Because this is our blog and not theirs. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe,</p>
<p><em>Why is their opinion worth any less than yours?</em></p>
<p>Because this is our blog and not theirs. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-928</guid>
		<description>@Joe: Apple was right to kill the Newton. It didn&#039;t sell, and when Palm released the Pilot, everybody preferred its size and weight. The Newton was too big and heavy for a pda, too small and weak for a laptop replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe: Apple was right to kill the Newton. It didn&#8217;t sell, and when Palm released the Pilot, everybody preferred its size and weight. The Newton was too big and heavy for a pda, too small and weak for a laptop replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-927</guid>
		<description>What a silly article! The fact that you don&#039;t like something doesn&#039;t make it a failure, much less an &#039;epic fail&#039;.

1. Hockey Puck Mouse. Lots of people liked it. Why is their opinion worth any less than yours?

2. Newton Message Pad. Years, if not a decade or more, ahead of its time. Newton was a great product and has a lot of fans, even today. Unfortunately, Doonesbury killed it before it had a chance to mature. Still, it was an incredible product by the standards of its time.

3. QuickTake. Again, years ahead of the competition. Great product and widely admired. At the point that lots of other companies started making digital cameras, Apple decided it wasn&#039;t strategic and dropped it. How does that make it a failure?

4. Pippin. Another product that was miles ahead of its time. Sadly, Apple relied on Bandai to market it - and it was never even brought to market. At the time, the concept of a game console that would run your regular computer OS was unheard of (for that matter, it still is). Had this been marketed properly, it would have sold like hotcakes.

5. Apple TV. Has sold millions of units. Hardly an epic failure.

Now, pick the LEAST successful of these products. What have you ever done that even approaches the least successful product Apple delivered?

Too bad it&#039;s so easy for loud-mouthed bloggers who couldn&#039;t create anything new if their lives depended no it to publish goofy articles like this. The Internet would be a lot more useful if only intelligent articles were published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a silly article! The fact that you don&#8217;t like something doesn&#8217;t make it a failure, much less an &#8216;epic fail&#8217;.</p>
<p>1. Hockey Puck Mouse. Lots of people liked it. Why is their opinion worth any less than yours?</p>
<p>2. Newton Message Pad. Years, if not a decade or more, ahead of its time. Newton was a great product and has a lot of fans, even today. Unfortunately, Doonesbury killed it before it had a chance to mature. Still, it was an incredible product by the standards of its time.</p>
<p>3. QuickTake. Again, years ahead of the competition. Great product and widely admired. At the point that lots of other companies started making digital cameras, Apple decided it wasn&#8217;t strategic and dropped it. How does that make it a failure?</p>
<p>4. Pippin. Another product that was miles ahead of its time. Sadly, Apple relied on Bandai to market it &#8211; and it was never even brought to market. At the time, the concept of a game console that would run your regular computer OS was unheard of (for that matter, it still is). Had this been marketed properly, it would have sold like hotcakes.</p>
<p>5. Apple TV. Has sold millions of units. Hardly an epic failure.</p>
<p>Now, pick the LEAST successful of these products. What have you ever done that even approaches the least successful product Apple delivered?</p>
<p>Too bad it&#8217;s so easy for loud-mouthed bloggers who couldn&#8217;t create anything new if their lives depended no it to publish goofy articles like this. The Internet would be a lot more useful if only intelligent articles were published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Apple TV actually was a revolutionary device, just 3-4 years too early. Mac Mini is the Apple TV of the future... but than built-in in a real TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple TV actually was a revolutionary device, just 3-4 years too early. Mac Mini is the Apple TV of the future&#8230; but than built-in in a real TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kboggs</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>kboggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-925</guid>
		<description>I must be the only guy on Earth, except maybe for Steve himself, who actually liked the hockey puck mouse. If it were optical and had multiple buttons, I&#039;d use one today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be the only guy on Earth, except maybe for Steve himself, who actually liked the hockey puck mouse. If it were optical and had multiple buttons, I&#8217;d use one today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-924</guid>
		<description>ok well this list has been done before...and much better I may say...

and the TV is not a failure...it just has not been taken to it&#039;s full potential

now that the Mac Mini has an HDMI port I expect to see a new different version of the TV

watch out son</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok well this list has been done before&#8230;and much better I may say&#8230;</p>
<p>and the TV is not a failure&#8230;it just has not been taken to it&#8217;s full potential</p>
<p>now that the Mac Mini has an HDMI port I expect to see a new different version of the TV</p>
<p>watch out son</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason K</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-923</guid>
		<description>You misspelled Bandai in the second paragraph. :)

Neat article, but what about the Lisa? Wasn&#039;t that a big ole fat stinker as well? And the iPod, those things were just horrible failures. I&#039;m actually surprised Apple survived releasing those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You misspelled Bandai in the second paragraph. :)</p>
<p>Neat article, but what about the Lisa? Wasn&#8217;t that a big ole fat stinker as well? And the iPod, those things were just horrible failures. I&#8217;m actually surprised Apple survived releasing those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyphorious</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/06/5_epic_apple_fails/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>cyphorious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=19534#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Well, I think &quot;epic&quot; is way too hard. You&#039;re absolutely right: this are all fails - but they paved the way for Apple&#039;s breakthrough products. It just wasn&#039;t the right time. OK, the puck mouse really epic failed. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think &#8220;epic&#8221; is way too hard. You&#8217;re absolutely right: this are all fails &#8211; but they paved the way for Apple&#8217;s breakthrough products. It just wasn&#8217;t the right time. OK, the puck mouse really epic failed. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

